Dk2 sync logic and UI and other fixes #1105
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
app/lib/pages/memories/page.dart (1)
145-148: LGTM: Enhanced MemoriesGroupWidget with additional parametersThe updates to the
MemoriesGroupWidgetconstructor improve the widget's ability to render based on its position and the presence of non-discarded memories. This aligns well with the PR objective of enhancing the Grouped MEMS UI.Consider a minor readability improvement:
For better code readability, consider reordering the parameters to group related ones together:
MemoriesGroupWidget( isFirst: index == 0, memories: memoriesForDate, date: date, hasNonDiscardedMemories: hasNonDiscarded, showDiscardedMemories: memoryProvider.showDiscardedMemories, hasDiscardedMemories: hasDiscarded, + // Reorder parameters + memories: memoriesForDate, + date: date, + isFirst: index == 0, + hasNonDiscardedMemories: hasNonDiscarded, + hasDiscardedMemories: hasDiscarded, + showDiscardedMemories: memoryProvider.showDiscardedMemories, ),This grouping puts related parameters (memories and date) together, followed by boolean flags.
app/lib/pages/sdcard/page.dart (1)
59-69: LGTM! Consider adding comments for clarity.The changes to the
SdCardTransferProgresswidget improve the accuracy of the progress tracking by using 'current' variables, which aligns with the PR objectives. This should provide a more precise representation of the ongoing transfer.Consider adding brief comments to explain the significance of using
currentTotalBytesReceivedandcurrentSdCardSecondsReceived. This would help future developers understand the reasoning behind these specific variables.For example:
// Use current variables for real-time progress tracking displayPercentage: provider.totalStorageFileBytes == 0 ? '0.0' : ((provider.currentTotalBytesReceived) / provider.totalStorageFileBytes * 100) .toStringAsFixed(2),app/lib/pages/memories/widgets/memories_group_widget.dart (1)
12-13: Consider adding documentation for new properties.The properties
hasNonDiscardedMemoriesandisFirsthave been added to theMemoriesGroupWidgetclass. It's advisable to include documentation comments (///) explaining their purpose and how they affect the widget's behavior.app/lib/providers/capture_provider.dart (2)
692-692: Avoid using magic numbers; define constants for better readabilityThe calculation uses hard-coded numbers like
80.0,100.0, and2.2. Consider defining these as constants with descriptive names to improve code readability and maintainability.Apply this diff:
+ const double CHUNK_SIZE = 80.0; + const double TOTAL_CHUNKS = 100.0; + const double DOWNLOAD_SPEED_FACTOR = 2.2; - currentSdCardSecondsReceived = ((currentTotalBytesReceived.toDouble() / 80.0) / 100.0) * 2.2; + currentSdCardSecondsReceived = ((currentTotalBytesReceived.toDouble() / CHUNK_SIZE) / TOTAL_CHUNKS) * DOWNLOAD_SPEED_FACTOR;
Line range hint
610-710: Refactor thesendStoragemethod to improve readabilityThe
sendStoragemethod is lengthy and contains complex nested logic. Consider breaking it down into smaller helper methods with descriptive names to enhance readability and maintainability.For example, you can extract parts of the method into private helper methods like
_handleValueLengthOne(),_handleLargeValueLength(), and_handleDisconnection().
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- app/lib/pages/memories/page.dart (1 hunks)
- app/lib/pages/memories/widgets/memories_group_widget.dart (1 hunks)
- app/lib/pages/sdcard/page.dart (1 hunks)
- app/lib/pages/sdcard/sdcard_transfer_progress.dart (1 hunks)
- app/lib/providers/capture_provider.dart (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (7)
app/lib/pages/sdcard/sdcard_transfer_progress.dart (1)
77-77: LGTM! Improved responsiveness for the flip animation.This change lowers the threshold for triggering the flip animation from 1% progress to any progress greater than 0. This aligns perfectly with the PR objective of allowing an immediate flip effect right after the button is pressed. The modification enhances the responsiveness of the UI, providing a more immediate visual feedback to the user when the transfer begins.
app/lib/pages/memories/page.dart (2)
138-138: LGTM: Improved memory filtering logicThe addition of the
hasNonDiscardedvariable enhances the filtering logic for memories. This change aligns with the PR objective of improving the Grouped MEMS UI by providing a way to check for the presence of non-discarded memories.
138-148: Summary: Improved memory filtering and UI rendering logicThe changes in this file enhance the handling of discarded and non-discarded memories, directly addressing the PR objective of improving the Grouped MEMS UI. The introduction of the
hasNonDiscardedvariable and the updates to theMemoriesGroupWidgetconstructor provide more granular control over how memory groups are displayed.These modifications should result in a more refined user interface, particularly in scenarios where both discarded and non-discarded memories are present. The changes are well-implemented and consistent with the overall goals of the pull request.
app/lib/pages/memories/widgets/memories_group_widget.dart (2)
29-32: Double-check the conditional logic for displayingDateListItem.Ensure that the condition accurately reflects the intended behavior, especially when
showDiscardedMemoriesisfalse,hasDiscardedMemoriesistrue, andhasNonDiscardedMemoriesisfalse. Verify that theDateListItemis displayed or hidden as expected in all scenarios.
39-42: Verify the display logic for the bottomSizedBox.Similar to the previous condition, confirm that the logic for rendering the bottom
SizedBoxaligns with the intended UI behavior. Ensure that the spacing is correctly applied or omitted based on the conditional checks.app/lib/providers/capture_provider.dart (2)
651-654: Clarify the logic for incrementingcurrentTotalBytesReceivedWhen
value.length == 83,currentTotalBytesReceivedis incremented by80; otherwise, it's incremented byvalue.length. This may lead to inconsistency if the additional 3 bytes are overhead or headers. Ensure that this logic accurately reflects the actual data received. Consider documenting why80is used in this calculation whenvalue.length == 83.
572-572: Verify the initialization ofcurrentSdCardSecondsReceived
currentSdCardSecondsReceivedis reset to0.0here. Ensure that this aligns with the expected behavior for progress tracking and does not conflict with progress calculations elsewhere. Confirm that resetting this variable here is necessary.
| if (!showDiscardedMemories && hasDiscardedMemories && !hasNonDiscardedMemories) | ||
| const SizedBox.shrink() | ||
| else | ||
| const SizedBox.shrink(), | ||
| DateListItem(date: date, isFirst: isFirst), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider simplifying repeated conditional logic for better readability.
The condition if (!showDiscardedMemories && hasDiscardedMemories && !hasNonDiscardedMemories) is used multiple times. For improved readability and maintainability, consider extracting this condition into a helper method or a local variable with a meaningful name.
For example, you can introduce a helper method:
bool shouldHideGroup() {
return !showDiscardedMemories && hasDiscardedMemories && !hasNonDiscardedMemories;
}Then update the code as follows:
if (shouldHideGroup())
const SizedBox.shrink()
else
DateListItem(date: date, isFirst: isFirst),And similarly for the bottom SizedBox:
if (shouldHideGroup())
const SizedBox.shrink()
else
const SizedBox(height: 16),Also applies to: 39-42
| required this.hasNonDiscardedMemories, | ||
| required this.showDiscardedMemories, | ||
| required this.hasDiscardedMemories}); | ||
| required this.hasDiscardedMemories, | ||
| required this.isFirst}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Missing Required Parameters in MemoriesGroupWidget Instantiations
The following instances of MemoriesGroupWidget are missing one or more required parameters:
-
app/lib/pages/memories/widgets/memories_group_widget.dart:const MemoriesGroupWidget( {super.key, required this.memories,
Missing parameters:
hasNonDiscardedMemories,isFirst -
app/lib/pages/memories/page.dart:MemoriesGroupWidget( isFirst: index == 0, memories: memoriesForDate,
Missing parameter:
hasNonDiscardedMemories
Please update these instantiations to include all required parameters to prevent potential compilation errors.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify all usages of MemoriesGroupWidget are updated with new required parameters.
Since hasNonDiscardedMemories and isFirst are now required parameters in the constructor, ensure that all instances where MemoriesGroupWidget is instantiated have been updated to include these new parameters to prevent compilation errors.
You can run the following script to find instantiations that may be missing the new parameters:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all instances of MemoriesGroupWidget that may not include the new required parameters.
# Search for MemoriesGroupWidget instantiations not containing 'hasNonDiscardedMemories' or 'isFirst'.
rg --type dart 'MemoriesGroupWidget\(' | rg -v 'hasNonDiscardedMemories|isFirst'
Length of output: 249
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Retrieve lines containing MemoriesGroupWidget instantiations with surrounding context for review.
rg --context 2 --type dart 'MemoriesGroupWidget\(' app/lib/pages/memories/page.dart app/lib/pages/memories/widgets/memories_group_widget.dart
Length of output: 995
| currentStorageFiles = await _getStorageList(_recordingDevice!.id); | ||
| if (currentStorageFiles.isEmpty || currentStorageFiles.length < 2) { | ||
| if (currentStorageFiles.isEmpty) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Possible null pointer exception when accessing _recordingDevice
In the updateStorageList() method, _recordingDevice may be null, which would cause a null pointer exception when accessing _recordingDevice!.id. Consider adding a null check before using _recordingDevice.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
+ if (_recordingDevice == null) {
+ debugPrint('No recording device connected');
+ return;
+ }
currentStorageFiles = await _getStorageList(_recordingDevice!.id);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| currentStorageFiles = await _getStorageList(_recordingDevice!.id); | |
| if (currentStorageFiles.isEmpty || currentStorageFiles.length < 2) { | |
| if (currentStorageFiles.isEmpty) { | |
| if (_recordingDevice == null) { | |
| debugPrint('No recording device connected'); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| currentStorageFiles = await _getStorageList(_recordingDevice!.id); | |
| if (currentStorageFiles.isEmpty) { |
| if (currentStorageFiles.isEmpty) { | ||
| debugPrint('No storage files found'); | ||
| SharedPreferencesUtil().deviceIsV2 = false; | ||
| debugPrint('Device is not V2'); | ||
|
|
||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| SharedPreferencesUtil().deviceIsV2 = true; | ||
| debugPrint('Device is V2'); | ||
| debugPrint('Device model name: ${_recordingDevice!.name}'); | ||
| debugPrint('Storage files: $currentStorageFiles'); | ||
| totalStorageFileBytes = currentStorageFiles[0]; | ||
| var storageOffset = currentStorageFiles[1]; | ||
| var storageOffset = currentStorageFiles.length < 2 ? 0 : currentStorageFiles[1]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor duplicated code for retrieving storage files
The logic for retrieving currentStorageFiles and handling cases when it's empty is duplicated in both updateStorageList() and initiateStorageBytesStreaming() methods. Consider extracting this logic into a shared private method to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.
Apply this diff to refactor the code:
+ Future<bool> _retrieveAndValidateStorageFiles() async {
+ currentStorageFiles = await _getStorageList(_recordingDevice!.id);
+ if (currentStorageFiles.isEmpty) {
+ debugPrint('No storage files found');
+ SharedPreferencesUtil().deviceIsV2 = false;
+ debugPrint('Device is not V2');
+ return false;
+ }
+ return true;
+ }
Future<void> updateStorageList() async {
+ if (_recordingDevice == null) {
+ debugPrint('No recording device connected');
+ return;
+ }
- currentStorageFiles = await _getStorageList(_recordingDevice!.id);
- if (currentStorageFiles.isEmpty) {
- debugPrint('No storage files found');
- SharedPreferencesUtil().deviceIsV2 = false;
- debugPrint('Device is not V2');
- return;
- }
+ if (!await _retrieveAndValidateStorageFiles()) {
+ return;
+ }
totalStorageFileBytes = currentStorageFiles[0];
var storageOffset = currentStorageFiles.length < 2 ? 0 : currentStorageFiles[1];
totalBytesReceived = storageOffset;
notifyListeners();
}
Future<void> initiateStorageBytesStreaming() async {
debugPrint('initiateStorageBytesStreaming');
if (_recordingDevice == null) return;
- currentStorageFiles = await _getStorageList(_recordingDevice!.id);
- if (currentStorageFiles.isEmpty) {
- debugPrint('No storage files found');
- SharedPreferencesUtil().deviceIsV2 = false;
- debugPrint('Device is not V2');
- return;
- }
+ if (!await _retrieveAndValidateStorageFiles()) {
+ return;
+ }
SharedPreferencesUtil().deviceIsV2 = true;
// ... rest of the code ...
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
|
lgtm 🥳 |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor