Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Uptake change to body consistency #293

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Apr 17, 2024

Conversation

timotheeguerin
Copy link
Member

@timotheeguerin timotheeguerin commented Feb 22, 2024

Core PR microsoft/typespec#2945

Azure spec PR showing scale of breaking changes Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#27897

@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

azure-sdk commented Feb 22, 2024

All changed packages have been documented.

  • @azure-tools/typespec-autorest-canonical
  • @azure-tools/typespec-autorest
  • @azure-tools/typespec-azure-core
  • @azure-tools/typespec-azure-resource-manager
Show changes

@azure-tools/typespec-autorest - fix ✏️

Add support for new @body @bodyRoot and @bodyIgnore decorators

@azure-tools/typespec-azure-core - fix ✏️

Update to support new meaning of @body

@azure-tools/typespec-azure-resource-manager - fix ✏️

Update to support new meaning of @body

@azure-tools/typespec-autorest-canonical - fix ✏️

Add support for new @body, @bodyRoot and @bodyIgnore

@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

Copy link
Member

@markcowl markcowl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few small things, I am really surprised by how few changes there are

@timotheeguerin timotheeguerin added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 17, 2024
Merged via the queue into Azure:main with commit 6a59458 Apr 17, 2024
21 checks passed
@timotheeguerin timotheeguerin deleted the uptake/body-consitency branch April 17, 2024 19:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants