Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create the Python Track 2 SDK for the Microsoft Azure Attestation Service. #18023

Merged
merged 69 commits into from
May 7, 2021

Conversation

LarryOsterman
Copy link
Member

@LarryOsterman LarryOsterman commented Apr 13, 2021

Create initial implementation of a Track 2 SDK For Python for the MAA Service.

@check-enforcer
Copy link

This pull request is protected by Check Enforcer.

What is Check Enforcer?

Check Enforcer helps ensure all pull requests are covered by at least one check-run (typically an Azure Pipeline). When all check-runs associated with this pull request pass then Check Enforcer itself will pass.

Why am I getting this message?

You are getting this message because Check Enforcer did not detect any check-runs being associated with this pull request within five minutes. This may indicate that your pull request is not covered by any pipelines and so Check Enforcer is correctly blocking the pull request being merged.

What should I do now?

If the check-enforcer check-run is not passing and all other check-runs associated with this PR are passing (excluding license-cla) then you could try telling Check Enforcer to evaluate your pull request again. You can do this by adding a comment to this pull request as follows:
/check-enforcer evaluate
Typically evaulation only takes a few seconds. If you know that your pull request is not covered by a pipeline and this is expected you can override Check Enforcer using the following command:
/check-enforcer override
Note that using the override command triggers alerts so that follow-up investigations can occur (PRs still need to be approved as normal).

What if I am onboarding a new service?

Often, new services do not have validation pipelines associated with them, in order to bootstrap pipelines for a new service, you can issue the following command as a pull request comment:
/azp run prepare-pipelines
This will run a pipeline that analyzes the source tree and creates the pipelines necessary to build and validate your pull request. Once the pipeline has been created you can trigger the pipeline using the following comment:
/azp run python - [service] - ci

@LarryOsterman LarryOsterman changed the title Larry o create python sdk Create the Python Track 2 SDK for the Microsoft Azure Attestation Service. Apr 14, 2021
@Azure Azure deleted a comment from azure-pipelines bot May 6, 2021
@Azure Azure deleted a comment from azure-pipelines bot May 6, 2021
@Azure Azure deleted a comment from azure-pipelines bot May 6, 2021
@Azure Azure deleted a comment from azure-pipelines bot May 6, 2021
@Azure Azure deleted a comment from azure-pipelines bot May 6, 2021
LarryOsterman and others added 10 commits May 6, 2021 16:16
…station/_administration_client.py

Co-authored-by: Sean Kane <68240067+seankane-msft@users.noreply.github.com>
…station/_administration_client.py

Co-authored-by: Sean Kane <68240067+seankane-msft@users.noreply.github.com>
…station/aio/_client_async.py

Co-authored-by: Sean Kane <68240067+seankane-msft@users.noreply.github.com>
…station/_client.py

Co-authored-by: Sean Kane <68240067+seankane-msft@users.noreply.github.com>
…l in certificates in get_signing_certificates
Copy link
Member

@lmazuel lmazuel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to preview to me

@LarryOsterman LarryOsterman merged commit 5d8bf17 into Azure:master May 7, 2021
@LarryOsterman LarryOsterman deleted the LarryO-CreatePythonSDK branch May 7, 2021 23:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants