Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sdk automation/azure mgmt search #14125

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 30, 2020

Conversation

colawwj
Copy link

@colawwj colawwj commented Sep 30, 2020

No description provided.

SDK Automation and others added 4 commits September 2, 2020 03:33
@ghost ghost added the Search label Sep 30, 2020
@LianwMS LianwMS merged commit 79bb773 into Azure:release/v3 Sep 30, 2020
openapi-sdkautomation bot pushed a commit to AzureSDKAutomation/azure-sdk-for-python that referenced this pull request May 28, 2021
[Hub Generated] Public private branch 'master' (Azure#14125)

* Swager specs for Sentinel Source Control RP API

* Remove unnecessary space.

* Fix avocado

* Fix SemanticValidation-Error

* Fix LintDiff

* add new api and change api version

* correct some merge error

* merge to master

* Avoid breaking change

* Add RepoList definition.

* Fix prettier issue.

* Fix prettier issue.

* Fix model validation issue.

* Fix model validation issue.

* Fix SDK Track2 validation.

* Reference common ResourceWithEtag.

* Fix LintDiff issue.

* Fix LintDiff issue.

* repository properties.

* fix regression.

* Fix reference.

* Fix lintDiff issue.

* using POST command instead of GET to retrieve repository metadata

* Fix ModelValidation error.

* Incorporate comments.

* remove duplicate systemData in SourceControl.

* add POST verb.

* Revert an unnecessary change.

* Fix error caused by merging.

* Revert an unreviewed change.

* Update API response.

* Fix typo.

* Update swagger definition.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants