Adding call signature customization support. #27653
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
glecaros
requested review from
mikeharder,
ckairen and
deyaaeldeen
as code owners
deyaaeldeen
reviewed
Nov 6, 2023
| if (signature.getParameters().length !== callSignature.getParameters().length) { | ||
| return false; | ||
| } | ||
| signature.getReturnTypeNode; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What is the purpose of this line?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
removed, it was just a leftover from a refactor.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks, did you open a new PR? This one is already merged without this change.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Packages impacted by this PR
dev-tool
Issues associated with this PR
This change adds support for customizing interface call signatures. It also fixes an issue with the property removal functionality.
Describe the problem that is addressed by this PR
What are the possible designs available to address the problem? If there are more than one possible design, why was the one in this PR chosen?
Are there test cases added in this PR? (If not, why?)
Provide a list of related PRs (if any)
Command used to generate this PR:**(Applicable only to SDK release request PRs)
Checklists