Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding new profile hybrid_2019_03_01 for dotnet #5822

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 1, 2019

Conversation

dsgouda
Copy link
Contributor

@dsgouda dsgouda commented May 1, 2019

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
  • adding/removing APIs.
  • adding/removing properties.
  • adding/removing API-version.
  • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
    Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented May 1, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

This PR contains more than 3 context, SDK generation is not enabled. Contexts found:

  • dns/resource-manager
  • monitor/resource-manager
  • authorization/resource-manager
  • compute/resource-manager
  • web/resource-manager
  • network/resource-manager
  • storage/resource-manager
  • keyvault/resource-manager
  • resources/resource-manager

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented May 1, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-java

This PR contains more than 3 context, SDK generation is not enabled. Contexts found:

  • compute/resource-manager
  • network/resource-manager
  • authorization/resource-manager
  • web/resource-manager
  • monitor/resource-manager
  • resources/resource-manager
  • dns/resource-manager
  • storage/resource-manager
  • keyvault/resource-manager

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented May 1, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-ruby

This PR contains more than 3 context, SDK generation is not enabled. Contexts found:

  • storage/resource-manager
  • monitor/resource-manager
  • network/resource-manager
  • compute/resource-manager
  • keyvault/resource-manager
  • resources/resource-manager
  • dns/resource-manager
  • authorization/resource-manager
  • web/resource-manager

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented May 1, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

This PR contains more than 3 context, SDK generation is not enabled. Contexts found:

  • keyvault/resource-manager
  • monitor/resource-manager
  • authorization/resource-manager
  • network/resource-manager
  • compute/resource-manager
  • storage/resource-manager
  • web/resource-manager
  • resources/resource-manager
  • dns/resource-manager

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented May 1, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-js

This PR contains more than 3 context, SDK generation is not enabled. Contexts found:

  • authorization/resource-manager
  • dns/resource-manager
  • compute/resource-manager
  • network/resource-manager
  • monitor/resource-manager
  • resources/resource-manager
  • web/resource-manager
  • storage/resource-manager
  • keyvault/resource-manager

@sergey-shandar sergey-shandar merged commit a95ceec into Azure:master May 1, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants