Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Security: 2017-08-01-preview - Introduce IoT security solution resource #5234

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Mar 28, 2019

Conversation

dortibi
Copy link
Contributor

@dortibi dortibi commented Feb 20, 2019

  • Add relevent APIs for new resource called Iot Security Solution part Microsoft.Security provider
    • new definitions
    • new get, put, delete, list operations
    • new examples files

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
  • adding/removing APIs.
  • adding/removing properties.
  • adding/removing API-version.
  • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
    Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Feb 20, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-ruby

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-ruby

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Feb 20, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

A PR has been created for you based on this PR content.

Once this PR will be merged, content will be added to your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#3782

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Feb 20, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-java

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-java

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Feb 20, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-js

A PR has been created for you based on this PR content.

Once this PR will be merged, content will be added to your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-js#1835

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Feb 20, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-go

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Feb 20, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-node

A PR has been created for you:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-node#4857

@dortibi
Copy link
Contributor Author

dortibi commented Feb 20, 2019

Could you please add a label - DoNotMerge?

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@veronicagg veronicagg changed the title Security: 2017-08-01-preview - Introduce IoT security solution resource [Do not merge] Security: 2017-08-01-preview - Introduce IoT security solution resource Feb 20, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@veronicagg veronicagg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've added [Do not merge] in the title, will you continue to add changes to the PR?
Have the changes been reviewed by ARM? I'll add them to the review.
Thanks!

@veronicagg veronicagg added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Feb 20, 2019
@veronicagg
Copy link
Contributor

BTW, you can browse your validation results and generated documentation using your work branch page in the OpenAPI Hub.

@dortibi
Copy link
Contributor Author

dortibi commented Feb 24, 2019

@veronicagg, there is no more changes.
could you please add @RyanBensonMSFT from ARM and @galmicrosoft for review?

@ravbhatnagar ravbhatnagar added the ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review label Feb 25, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@KrisBash KrisBash left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ARM comments appear to be addressed. Thanks

@KrisBash KrisBash added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review labels Feb 26, 2019
@veronicagg
Copy link
Contributor

@dortibi

  • Please resolve branch conflicts.

  • The tag defined in the readme.md file "--tag=package-composite-v1" is composing "security.json" for 2 api versions, is that intentional on your end?

  • CI is failing on some SDK generation jobs, I'd like to see the results after conflicts are resolved.

  • In order to merge the PR, the APIs should be deployed, so SDKs generated out of it work for customers, please let us know when that happens.

Thanks!

@KrisBash KrisBash removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Feb 28, 2019
# Conflicts:
#	specification/security/resource-manager/Microsoft.Security/preview/2017-08-01-preview/security.json
@veronicagg
Copy link
Contributor

@dortibi CI is looking good now. Please let know if you have more pending updates, and answers to my questions above. Thanks.

@dortibi
Copy link
Contributor Author

dortibi commented Mar 26, 2019

Hi @veronicagg,
could you please remove the [Do not merge] and merge the PR?
This PR ready for merge.

@veronicagg
Copy link
Contributor

@dortibi Have the APIs been deployed?
Also, the tag defined in the readme.md file "--tag=package-composite-v1" is composing "security.json" for 2 api versions, is that intentional on your end?

@veronicagg veronicagg changed the title [Do not merge] Security: 2017-08-01-preview - Introduce IoT security solution resource Security: 2017-08-01-preview - Introduce IoT security solution resource Mar 26, 2019
@dortibi
Copy link
Contributor Author

dortibi commented Mar 28, 2019

Hi @veronicagg ,
Yes, the APIs deployed.
about the API versions, our team is not the owners of this resource provider. maybe @chlahav could answer you.
Anyway, this API spec should be merged since we announce this service today and the service deployed and ready.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants