Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Version value to fix Ruby SDK Generation #4400

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2018

Conversation

sarangan12
Copy link
Member

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 5, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-ruby

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-ruby

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 5, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-java

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-java

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 5, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

A PR has been created for you based on this PR content.

Once this PR will be merged, content will be added to your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#3747

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 5, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-node

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-node#4028

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 5, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-js

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-js#403

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 5, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#3239

@sarangan12
Copy link
Member Author

@vchske Please take a look at this code change.

@vchske vchske self-requested a review November 5, 2018 20:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants