Skip to content

Conversation

@v-thepet
Copy link

@v-thepet v-thepet commented Jan 2, 2026

This PR contains fixes to 5 broken links in 1 article. # of links fixed: 15
For request details, see 540734

Choose a PR Template

Switch to "Preview" on this description then select one of the choices below.

Click here to open a PR for a Data Plane API.

Click here to open a PR for a Control Plane (ARM) API.

Click here to open a PR for only SDK configuration.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2026

Next Steps to Merge

Next steps that must be taken to merge this PR:
  • ❌ This PR targets either the main branch of the public specs repo or the RPSaaSMaster branch of the private specs repo. These branches are not intended for iterative development. Therefore, you must acknowledge you understand that after this PR is merged, the APIs are considered shipped to Azure customers. Any further attempts at in-place modifications to the APIs will be subject to Azure's versioning and breaking change policies. Additionally, for control plane APIs, you must acknowledge that you are following all the best practices documented by ARM at aka.ms/armapibestpractices. If you do intend to release the APIs to your customers by merging this PR, add the PublishToCustomers label to your PR in acknowledgement of the above. Otherwise, retarget this PR onto a feature branch, i.e. with prefix release- (see aka.ms/azsdk/api-versions#release--branches).
  • ❌ This PR is in purview of the ARM review (label: ARMReview). This PR must get ARMSignedOff label from an ARM reviewer.
    This PR is awaiting ARM reviewer feedback (label: WaitForARMFeedback).
    To learn when this PR will get reviewed, see ARM review queue at aka.ms/azsdk/pr-arm-review
    For details of the ARM review, see aka.ms/azsdk/pr-arm-review
  • ❌ The required check named SDK Validation Status has failed. Refer to the check in the PR's 'Checks' tab for details on how to fix it and consult the aka.ms/ci-fix guide


Comment generated by summarize-checks workflow run.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the TypeSpec Authored with TypeSpec label Jan 2, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2026

API Change Check

APIView identified API level changes in this PR and created the following API reviews

Language API Review for Package
TypeSpec Microsoft.AwsConnector
Swagger Microsoft.AwsConnector
Java com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-awsconnector

@v-thepet
Copy link
Author

v-thepet commented Jan 3, 2026

I will close/reopen to try another run of JS/Python. Copilot suggests saying: ""My changes only touched CloudFrontDistribution.Management's main.ts and cloudfrontdistribution.json. The awsconnector failures are unrelated and pre-existing or environmental. Please re-run CI or address those broken builds outside the context of this link remediation PR."

@v-thepet v-thepet closed this Jan 3, 2026
@v-thepet v-thepet reopened this Jan 3, 2026
@v-thepet
Copy link
Author

v-thepet commented Jan 4, 2026

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Commenter does not have sufficient privileges for PR 39420 in repo Azure/azure-rest-api-specs

@v-thepet v-thepet marked this pull request as ready for review January 4, 2026 22:17
@github-actions github-actions bot added ARMReview WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Jan 4, 2026
@v-thepet
Copy link
Author

v-thepet commented Jan 4, 2026

@timotheeguerin @mumian @Kiranchandratrey - The build issues appear to be failures to generate readme code for Python and JS, which is not part of my changes. (I also don't have the required permissions to be able to apply the label PublishToCustomers.) Let me know how I can help follow the correct process to get this PR merged, plus several hundred other broken link corrections for awsconnector and several thousand in other APIs. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ARMReview resource-manager RPaaS TypeSpec Authored with TypeSpec WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant