Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New ApiVersion 2022-09-01-preview : Fix Linter errors #23706

Merged

Conversation

solankisamir
Copy link
Member

@solankisamir solankisamir commented Apr 25, 2023

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @solankisamir Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vscswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Apr 25, 2023

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️⚠️Breaking Change(Cross-Version): 7 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)] new version base version
    apimapis.json 2022-09-01-preview(f441e75) 2022-08-01(main)
    apimapis.json 2022-09-01-preview(f441e75) 2022-04-01-preview(main)
    apimpolicies.json 2022-09-01-preview(f441e75) 2022-08-01(main)
    apimpolicies.json 2022-09-01-preview(f441e75) 2022-04-01-preview(main)
    apimpolicyfragments.json 2022-09-01-preview(f441e75) 2022-08-01(main)
    apimpolicyfragments.json 2022-09-01-preview(f441e75) 2022-04-01-preview(main)
    apimportalconfigs.json 2022-09-01-preview(f441e75) 2022-08-01(main)
    apimportalconfigs.json 2022-09-01-preview(f441e75) 2022-04-01-preview(main)
    apimproducts.json 2022-09-01-preview(f441e75) 2022-08-01(main)
    apimproducts.json 2022-09-01-preview(f441e75) 2022-04-01-preview(main)
    definitions.json 2022-09-01-preview(f441e75) 2022-08-01(main)
    definitions.json 2022-09-01-preview(f441e75) 2022-04-01-preview(main)

    The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest preview version:

    Rule Message
    ⚠️ 1026 - TypeChanged The new version has a different type 'object' than the previous one ''.
    New: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/definitions.json#L4432:9
    Old: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-04-01-preview/definitions.json#L4142:9
    ⚠️ 1026 - TypeChanged The new version has a different type 'object' than the previous one ''.
    New: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/definitions.json#L5796:9
    Old: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-04-01-preview/definitions.json#L5454:9
    ⚠️ 1026 - TypeChanged The new version has a different type 'object' than the previous one ''.
    New: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/definitions.json#L4443:5
    Old: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-04-01-preview/definitions.json#L4153:5
    ⚠️ 1026 - TypeChanged The new version has a different type 'object' than the previous one ''.
    New: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/definitions.json#L4432:9
    Old: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-04-01-preview/definitions.json#L4142:9
    ⚠️ 1026 - TypeChanged The new version has a different type 'object' than the previous one ''.
    New: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/definitions.json#L5796:9
    Old: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-04-01-preview/definitions.json#L5454:9
    ⚠️ 1026 - TypeChanged The new version has a different type 'object' than the previous one ''.
    New: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/definitions.json#L4443:5
    Old: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-04-01-preview/definitions.json#L4153:5
    ⚠️ 1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'count' renamed or removed?
    New: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/definitions.json#L1436:7
    Old: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-04-01-preview/definitions.json#L1343:7
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.0.0) new version base version
    package-preview-2022-09 package-preview-2022-09(f441e75) package-preview-2022-09(release-apimanagement-2022-09-01-preview)

    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    GetCollectionResponseSchema The response in the GET collection operation 'Api_ListByService' does not match the response definition in the individual GET operation 'Api_Get' .
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L37
    CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async PUT operation is tracked via Azure-AsyncOperation header. Set 'final-state-via' property to 'azure-async-operation' on 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L215
    CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation Only 201 is the supported response code for PUT async response.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L313
    GetCollectionResponseSchema The response in the GET collection operation 'ApiRelease_ListByService' does not match the response definition in the individual GET operation 'ApiRelease_Get' .
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L523
    RepeatedPathInfo The 'apiId' already appears in the path, please don't repeat it in the request body.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L705
    UnSupportedPatchProperties The patch operation body parameter schema should not contains property name.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L787
    UnSupportedPatchProperties The patch operation body parameter schema should not contains property type.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L787
    GetCollectionResponseSchema The response in the GET collection operation 'ApiOperation_ListByApi' does not match the response definition in the individual GET operation 'ApiOperation_Get' .
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L877
    GetCollectionResponseSchema The response in the GET collection operation 'ApiOperationPolicy_ListByOperation' does not match the response definition in the individual GET operation 'ApiOperationPolicy_Get' .
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L1241
    GetCollectionResponseSchema The response in the GET collection operation 'Tag_ListByOperation' does not match the response definition in the individual GET operation 'Tag_GetByOperation' .
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L1532
    GetCollectionResponseSchema The response in the GET collection operation 'GraphQLApiResolver_ListByApi' does not match the response definition in the individual GET operation 'GraphQLApiResolver_Get' .
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L1810
    GetCollectionResponseSchema The response in the GET collection operation 'GraphQLApiResolverPolicy_ListByResolver' does not match the response definition in the individual GET operation 'GraphQLApiResolverPolicy_Get' .
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L2164
    GetCollectionResponseSchema The response in the GET collection operation 'ApiPolicy_ListByApi' does not match the response definition in the individual GET operation 'ApiPolicy_Get' .
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L2520
    GetCollectionResponseSchema The response in the GET collection operation 'ApiSchema_ListByApi' does not match the response definition in the individual GET operation 'ApiSchema_Get' .
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L2804
    CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async PUT operation is tracked via Azure-AsyncOperation header. Set 'final-state-via' property to 'azure-async-operation' on 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L2967
    CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation Only 201 is the supported response code for PUT async response.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L3011
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L3011
    GetCollectionResponseSchema The response in the GET collection operation 'ApiDiagnostic_ListByService' does not match the response definition in the individual GET operation 'ApiDiagnostic_Get' .
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L3107
    UnSupportedPatchProperties The patch operation body parameter schema should not contains property name.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L3371
    UnSupportedPatchProperties The patch operation body parameter schema should not contains property type.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L3371
    GetCollectionResponseSchema The response in the GET collection operation 'ApiIssue_ListByService' does not match the response definition in the individual GET operation 'ApiIssue_Get' .
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L3461
    RepeatedPathInfo The 'apiId' already appears in the path, please don't repeat it in the request body.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L3657
    GetCollectionResponseSchema The response in the GET collection operation 'ApiIssueComment_ListByService' does not match the response definition in the individual GET operation 'ApiIssueComment_Get' .
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L3829
    GetCollectionResponseSchema The response in the GET collection operation 'ApiIssueAttachment_ListByService' does not match the response definition in the individual GET operation 'ApiIssueAttachment_Get' .
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L4134
    GetCollectionResponseSchema The response in the GET collection operation 'ApiTagDescription_ListByService' does not match the response definition in the individual GET operation 'ApiTagDescription_Get' .
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L4439
    GetCollectionResponseSchema The response in the GET collection operation 'Tag_ListByApi' does not match the response definition in the individual GET operation 'Tag_GetByApi' .
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L4729
    GetCollectionResponseSchema The response in the GET collection operation 'ApiWikis_List' does not match the response definition in the individual GET operation 'ApiWiki_Get' .
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimapis.json#L5350
    GetCollectionResponseSchema The response in the GET collection operation 'Policy_ListByService' does not match the response definition in the individual GET operation 'Policy_Get' .
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimpolicies.json#L37
    GetCollectionResponseSchema The response in the GET collection operation 'PolicyFragment_ListByService' does not match the response definition in the individual GET operation 'PolicyFragment_Get' .
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimpolicyfragments.json#L37
    CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async PUT operation is tracked via Azure-AsyncOperation header. Set 'final-state-via' property to 'azure-async-operation' on 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-09-01-preview/apimpolicyfragments.json#L204
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️CadlAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for CadlValidation.
    ️️✔️TypeSpec Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for TypeSpec Validation.
    ️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Summary.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Apr 25, 2023

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️⚠️SDK Breaking Change Tracking warning [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 failed [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Apr 25, 2023

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Swagger Microsoft.ApiManagement https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/3d946417db924fc2941f94fc6a5e1f9a
    Go sdk/resourcemanager/apimanagement/armapimanagement https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/759910bec4c94b1d9903f68d5305545b
    JavaScript @azure/arm-apimanagement https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/e32980f4c4c54c5f93c93405f1afae47

    @solankisamir
    Copy link
    Member Author

    Fixing linter errors identified here - #22978

    @live1206 live1206 merged commit e6e61df into release-apimanagement-2022-09-01-preview Apr 26, 2023
    @live1206 live1206 deleted the sasolank/linter-errors branch April 26, 2023 01:14
    weidongxu-microsoft pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2023
    * Adds base for updating Microsoft.ApiManagement from version stable/2022-08-01 to version 2022-09-01-preview
    
    * Updates readme
    
    * Updates API version in new specs and examples
    
    * Add circuit breaker to the backend contract (#21320) (#23359)
    
    * add circuit breaker to the backend contract
    
    * resolve validation errors
    
    * Revert "resolve validation errors" and last push
    
    This reverts commit c557685.
    
    * resolve validation errors
    
    * run prettier
    
    * stv2.1 (#23326)
    
    * added Workspaces feature-related endpoints and contracts (#23330)
    
    * added Workspaces feature-related endpoints and contracts
    
    * cleanup
    
    * prettier
    
    * + examples
    
    * - redundant examples
    
    * link contracts for PUT
    
    * typo
    
    * Location header added to async operations
    
    ---------
    
    Co-authored-by: promoisha <glfeokti@microsoft.com>
    
    * New ApiVersion 2022-09-01-preview : Fix Linter errors (#23706)
    
    * x-ms-pageable extension for all list calls on policy
    
    * x-ms-secret to secret values
    
    * location header and invalid produces
    
    * New Api-Version 2022-09-01-preview: Linter Errors (#23739)
    
    * boolean to x-ms-enum
    
    * add location header to 202 response
    
    * Location header to all 202 operations
    
    ---------
    
    Co-authored-by: Mahsa Sadi <mahsa.sadi@utoronto.ca>
    Co-authored-by: promoisha <feoktistovgg@gmail.com>
    Co-authored-by: promoisha <glfeokti@microsoft.com>
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    3 participants