Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixing Documentation +Bugs on PublicIPAddress & DdosProtectionPlan Resources #21300

Conversation

mchakka
Copy link
Contributor

@mchakka mchakka commented Oct 26, 2022

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

We recently added a fix for the 2022-05-01 version to fix the documentation and we're making the change for the newest API version. Link to the fix for the previous version: #20978

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @mchakka Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vscswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Oct 26, 2022

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️❌Breaking Change(Cross-Version): 1 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.1)] new version base version
    ddosProtectionPlan.json 2022-07-01(9ae0172) 2022-05-01(main)
    publicIpAddress.json 2022-07-01(9ae0172) 2022-05-01(main)

    The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest stable version:

    Rule Message
    1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'publicIpAddresses' renamed or removed?
    New: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/ddosProtectionPlan.json#L402:7
    Old: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/ddosProtectionPlan.json#L396:7
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared tags (via openapi-validator v1.13.0) new version base version
    package-2022-07 package-2022-07(9ae0172) package-2022-07(release-network-Microsoft.Network-2022-07-01)

    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'DdosProtectionPlan' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/ddosProtectionPlan.json#L359
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'DdosProtectionPlanPropertiesFormat' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/ddosProtectionPlan.json#L401
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'DdosProtectionPlanListResult' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/ddosProtectionPlan.json#L432
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressSku' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L435
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressSku' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L435
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressSku' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L435
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressSku' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L435
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressSku' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L435
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressSku' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L435
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressSku' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L435
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressSku' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L435
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressSku' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L435
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressSku' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L435
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressSku' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L435
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressSku' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L435
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressSku' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L435
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressSku' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L435
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressSku' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L435
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressSku' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L435
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressSku' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L435
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressSku' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L435
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressSku' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L435
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressPropertiesFormat' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L464
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressPropertiesFormat' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L464
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressPropertiesFormat' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L464
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressPropertiesFormat' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L464
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressPropertiesFormat' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L464
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressPropertiesFormat' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L464
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressPropertiesFormat' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L464
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PublicIPAddressPropertiesFormat' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-07-01/publicIpAddress.json#L464
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for CadlValidation.
    ️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Summary.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Oct 26, 2022

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️⚠️SDK Breaking Change Tracking warning [Detail]

    Breaking Changes Tracking


    ⚠️azure-sdk-for-js - @azure/arm-network - 31.0.0
    +	Interface DdosProtectionPlan no longer has parameter publicIpAddresses
    ⚠️azure-sdk-for-python-track2 - track2_azure-mgmt-network - 22.1.0
    +	Removed operation group NspLinkReconcileOperations
    +	Removed operation group NspLinkReferenceReconcileOperations
    +	Removed operation group NspLinkReferencesOperations
    +	Removed operation group NspLinksOperations
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from a3f618b7ac364e65438d324f0d13af747cfed927. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	sudo apt-get install -y dotnet-sdk-6.0
      command	autorest --version=2.0.4421 --csharp --reflect-api-versions --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.csharp@2.3.82 --csharp-sdks-folder=/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/network/resource-manager/readme.md
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
    • ️✔️Microsoft.Azure.Management.Network [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs] Generate from a3f618b7ac364e65438d324f0d13af747cfed927. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Init.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json
      warn	File azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[91mGeneratePackage: �[0m/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:517
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[96mLine |
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[96m 517 | �[0m         �[96mGeneratePackage -projectFolder $projectFolder -sdkRootPath $s�[0m …
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[96m     | �[91m         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[91m�[96m     | �[91mFailed to generate sdk. exit code: False
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[0m
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[91mGet-ChildItem: �[0m/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:601
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[96mLine |
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[96m 601 | �[0m … rtifacts += �[96mGet-ChildItem $artifactsPath -Filter *.nupkg -exclude *.s�[0m …
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[96m     | �[91m               ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[91m�[96m     | �[91mCannot find path
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[96m     | �[91m'/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/artifacts/packages/Debug/' because it does not exist.
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[0m
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[91mGeneratePackage: �[0m/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:517
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[96mLine |
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[96m 517 | �[0m         �[96mGeneratePackage -projectFolder $projectFolder -sdkRootPath $s�[0m …
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[96m     | �[91m         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[91m�[96m     | �[91mFailed to generate sdk artifact
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[0m
    • Azure.ResourceManager.Network [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog]
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from a3f618b7ac364e65438d324f0d13af747cfed927. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-network [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] ### Breaking Changes
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Removed operation group NspLinkReconcileOperations
      info	[Changelog]   - Removed operation group NspLinkReferenceReconcileOperations
      info	[Changelog]   - Removed operation group NspLinkReferencesOperations
      info	[Changelog]   - Removed operation group NspLinksOperations
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-java succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from a3f618b7ac364e65438d324f0d13af747cfed927. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/network/armnetwork [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `DelegationProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `PartnerManagedResourceProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `DeploymentType` in struct `VirtualAppliancePropertiesFormat`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `PartnerManagedResource` in struct `VirtualAppliancePropertiesFormat`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Delegation` in struct `VirtualAppliancePropertiesFormat`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `CustomBlockResponseStatusCode` in struct `PolicySettings`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `CustomBlockResponseBody` in struct `PolicySettings`
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 6 additive change(s).
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from a3f618b7ac364e65438d324f0d13af747cfed927. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
      warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️@azure/arm-network [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] **Features**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface DdosProtectionPlansDeleteHeaders
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface DelegationProperties
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface PartnerManagedResourceProperties
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface PublicIPAddressesDdosProtectionStatusHeaders
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface PublicIPAddressesDeleteHeaders
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface DdosProtectionPlan has a new optional parameter publicIPAddresses
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface NetworkVirtualAppliance has a new optional parameter delegation
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface NetworkVirtualAppliance has a new optional parameter deploymentType
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface NetworkVirtualAppliance has a new optional parameter partnerManagedResource
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface PolicySettings has a new optional parameter customBlockResponseBody
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface PolicySettings has a new optional parameter customBlockResponseStatusCode
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] **Breaking Changes**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface DdosProtectionPlan no longer has parameter publicIpAddresses
    ️🔄 azure-resource-manager-schemas inProgress [Detail]
    ️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs] Generate from a3f618b7ac364e65438d324f0d13af747cfed927. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • Az.network [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @ghost ghost added the Network label Oct 26, 2022
    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Oct 26, 2022

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Go sdk/resourcemanager/network/armnetwork https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/4cd79a73eb5b4988adb0d5f3772e9bd0
    Java azure-resourcemanager-network-generated https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/0a2790e13a324f3a8b9a26b60369b822
    JavaScript @azure/arm-network https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/871b33b821b748d59488135ea38666a8
    Python track2_azure-mgmt-network Create ApiView timeout. Package is too large and we cannot create ApiView for it.

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @mchakka, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff. If you have any questions, please post your questions in this channel https://aka.ms/swaggersupport.

    TaskHow to fixPriority
    AvocadoFix-AvocadoHigh
    Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHigh
    Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHigh
    LintDiffFix-LintDiffhigh
    If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback.

    @mchakka mchakka changed the title Fixing Documentation on Public IP Address Fixing Documentation on Public IP Address for 2022-07-01 API Version Oct 27, 2022
    @mchakka mchakka changed the title Fixing Documentation on Public IP Address for 2022-07-01 API Version Fixing Documentation +Bugs on Public IP Address Resourc Oct 28, 2022
    @mchakka mchakka changed the title Fixing Documentation +Bugs on Public IP Address Resourc Fixing Documentation +Bugs on Public IP Address Resource Oct 28, 2022
    @mchakka mchakka changed the title Fixing Documentation +Bugs on Public IP Address Resource Fixing Documentation +Bugs on PublicIPAddress & DdosProtectionPlan Resources Oct 28, 2022
    @AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added the BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required label Oct 28, 2022
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @mchakka, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
    Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
    If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
    If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.
    Note: To avoid breaking change, you can refer to Shift Left Solution for detecting breaking change in early phase at your service code repository.

    @raych1
    Copy link
    Member

    raych1 commented Oct 31, 2022

    @mchakka , please fix modelvalidation failures and request breaking change review approval.

    @mchakka
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    mchakka commented Oct 31, 2022

    Regarding Breaking change - this is not a breaking change, it's actually a bug fix. While building the Powershell cmdlets, we noticed that the swagger defintion had a mis-match to the actual response from the API in NRP, hence we're making the fix here so the new SDK will match the response from NRP so that the PS cmdlets will finally work.

    The feature is not released to customers yet so we will not be breaking anything through this change. Please let us know how to proceed as we're on a tight deadline for the monthly network swagger release

    @JeffreyRichter JeffreyRichter added the Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 label Nov 1, 2022
    @raych1 raych1 merged commit 62b9f65 into release-network-Microsoft.Network-2022-07-01 Nov 2, 2022
    @raych1 raych1 deleted the manaschakka/fixdocumentation branch November 2, 2022 01:42
    raych1 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2022
    * Adds base for updating Microsoft.Network from version stable/2022-05-01 to version 2022-07-01
    
    * Updates readme
    
    * Updates API version in new specs and examples
    
    * Adds a SaaS NVA swagger changes (#20973)
    
    * add saas nva swagger changes
    
    * add saas nva put example
    
    * add arm-id format
    
    * minor change
    
    * address review comments
    
    * add custom words
    
    * Sync python sdk config change from main (#21129)
    
    * 12997638: Custom Block Response support for AppGW WAF (#21113)
    
    * 12997638: Custom Block Response support for AppGW WAF
    
    * 12997638: CustomBlockresponse for Appgw WAF - added example
    
    * 12997638: Custom Block Response for AppGW WAF lint fix
    
    Co-authored-by: akshaymurali <akshaymurali@microsoft.com>
    
    * Cherry picked resurrected verification (#21218)
    
    * Fixing Documentation +Bugs on PublicIPAddress & DdosProtectionPlan Resources (#21300)
    
    * small fix
    
    * bug fix
    
    * some model validation fixes
    
    * more model validation fixes?
    
    * more fixes
    
    * fixed prettier
    
    Co-authored-by: Manas Chakka <manaschakka@microsoft.com>
    
    Co-authored-by: Haoran Hong <88764852+honghr@users.noreply.github.com>
    Co-authored-by: sbhosalemsft <98562322+sbhosalemsft@users.noreply.github.com>
    Co-authored-by: Ray Chen <raychen@microsoft.com>
    Co-authored-by: akshaym6 <35283938+akshaym6@users.noreply.github.com>
    Co-authored-by: akshaymurali <akshaymurali@microsoft.com>
    Co-authored-by: Mikhail <mitryakh@microsoft.com>
    Co-authored-by: Manas Chakka <mchakka@gmail.com>
    Co-authored-by: Manas Chakka <manaschakka@microsoft.com>
    anandanthony pushed a commit to anandMicro/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2022
    * Adds base for updating Microsoft.Network from version stable/2022-05-01 to version 2022-07-01
    
    * Updates readme
    
    * Updates API version in new specs and examples
    
    * Adds a SaaS NVA swagger changes (Azure#20973)
    
    * add saas nva swagger changes
    
    * add saas nva put example
    
    * add arm-id format
    
    * minor change
    
    * address review comments
    
    * add custom words
    
    * Sync python sdk config change from main (Azure#21129)
    
    * 12997638: Custom Block Response support for AppGW WAF (Azure#21113)
    
    * 12997638: Custom Block Response support for AppGW WAF
    
    * 12997638: CustomBlockresponse for Appgw WAF - added example
    
    * 12997638: Custom Block Response for AppGW WAF lint fix
    
    Co-authored-by: akshaymurali <akshaymurali@microsoft.com>
    
    * Cherry picked resurrected verification (Azure#21218)
    
    * Fixing Documentation +Bugs on PublicIPAddress & DdosProtectionPlan Resources (Azure#21300)
    
    * small fix
    
    * bug fix
    
    * some model validation fixes
    
    * more model validation fixes?
    
    * more fixes
    
    * fixed prettier
    
    Co-authored-by: Manas Chakka <manaschakka@microsoft.com>
    
    Co-authored-by: Haoran Hong <88764852+honghr@users.noreply.github.com>
    Co-authored-by: sbhosalemsft <98562322+sbhosalemsft@users.noreply.github.com>
    Co-authored-by: Ray Chen <raychen@microsoft.com>
    Co-authored-by: akshaym6 <35283938+akshaym6@users.noreply.github.com>
    Co-authored-by: akshaymurali <akshaymurali@microsoft.com>
    Co-authored-by: Mikhail <mitryakh@microsoft.com>
    Co-authored-by: Manas Chakka <mchakka@gmail.com>
    Co-authored-by: Manas Chakka <manaschakka@microsoft.com>
    kayousef-zz pushed a commit to kayousef-zz/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2022
    * Adds base for updating Microsoft.Network from version stable/2022-05-01 to version 2022-07-01
    
    * Updates readme
    
    * Updates API version in new specs and examples
    
    * Adds a SaaS NVA swagger changes (Azure#20973)
    
    * add saas nva swagger changes
    
    * add saas nva put example
    
    * add arm-id format
    
    * minor change
    
    * address review comments
    
    * add custom words
    
    * Sync python sdk config change from main (Azure#21129)
    
    * 12997638: Custom Block Response support for AppGW WAF (Azure#21113)
    
    * 12997638: Custom Block Response support for AppGW WAF
    
    * 12997638: CustomBlockresponse for Appgw WAF - added example
    
    * 12997638: Custom Block Response for AppGW WAF lint fix
    
    Co-authored-by: akshaymurali <akshaymurali@microsoft.com>
    
    * Cherry picked resurrected verification (Azure#21218)
    
    * Fixing Documentation +Bugs on PublicIPAddress & DdosProtectionPlan Resources (Azure#21300)
    
    * small fix
    
    * bug fix
    
    * some model validation fixes
    
    * more model validation fixes?
    
    * more fixes
    
    * fixed prettier
    
    Co-authored-by: Manas Chakka <manaschakka@microsoft.com>
    
    Co-authored-by: Haoran Hong <88764852+honghr@users.noreply.github.com>
    Co-authored-by: sbhosalemsft <98562322+sbhosalemsft@users.noreply.github.com>
    Co-authored-by: Ray Chen <raychen@microsoft.com>
    Co-authored-by: akshaym6 <35283938+akshaym6@users.noreply.github.com>
    Co-authored-by: akshaymurali <akshaymurali@microsoft.com>
    Co-authored-by: Mikhail <mitryakh@microsoft.com>
    Co-authored-by: Manas Chakka <mchakka@gmail.com>
    Co-authored-by: Manas Chakka <manaschakka@microsoft.com>
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required CI-BreakingChange-JavaScript CI-FixRequiredOnFailure Network resource-manager
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    4 participants