Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding CallRecording event to ACS Eventgrid Schema and adding tag field to SMSDeliveryReportReceived event #13408

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 13, 2021

Conversation

pgrandhi
Copy link
Contributor

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Changelog

Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • [ x] update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When you are targeting to deploy new service/feature to public regions? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
  3. When you expect to publish swagger? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
  4. If it's an update to existing version, please select SDKs of specific language and CLIs that require refresh after swagger is published.
    • [x ] SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • [x ] SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • [x ] SDK of Go
    • [x ] PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • No, no need to refresh for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.

    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
    • Ensure to copy the existing version into new directory structure for first commit (including refactoring) and then push new changes including version updates in separate commits. This is required to review the changes efficiently.
    • Adding a new service
  • Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in stable version
  • Removing properties in stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in stable version
  • Updating API in stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @pgrandhi Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Mar 12, 2021

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.

    ️️✔️LintDiff succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for LintDiff.

    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on preview version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on stable version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️⚠️[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation: 43 Warnings warning [Detail] Only 10 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"eventgrid/data-plane/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2018-01",
    "details":"The schema 'IotHubDeviceCreatedEventData' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"eventgrid/data-plane/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2018-01",
    "details":"The schema 'IotHubDeviceDeletedEventData' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"eventgrid/data-plane/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2018-01",
    "details":"The schema 'IotHubDeviceConnectedEventData' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"eventgrid/data-plane/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2018-01",
    "details":"The schema 'IotHubDeviceDisconnectedEventData' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"eventgrid/data-plane/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2018-01",
    "details":"The schema 'IotHubDeviceTelemetryEventData' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"eventgrid/data-plane/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2018-01",
    "details":"The schema 'ContainerRegistryImagePushedEventData' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"eventgrid/data-plane/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2018-01",
    "details":"The schema 'ContainerRegistryImageDeletedEventData' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"eventgrid/data-plane/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2018-01",
    "details":"The schema 'ContainerRegistryChartPushedEventData' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"eventgrid/data-plane/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2018-01",
    "details":"The schema 'ContainerRegistryChartDeletedEventData' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"eventgrid/data-plane/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2018-01",
    "details":"The schema 'ContainerRegistryEventData' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ️️✔️[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Mar 12, 2021

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-python failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from b81a30c. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmdout	[automation_generate.sh] [Autorest]../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json does not exist!!!Error happened during package
      error	Script return with result [failed] code [1] signal [null] cwd [azure-sdk-for-python]: sh scripts/automation_generate.sh
      warn	Skip package processing as generation is failed
    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-js failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from b81a30c. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	autorest --version=V2 --typescript --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.typescript@4.4.4 --typescript-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-js/azure-sdk-for-js ../../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/eventgrid/data-plane/readme.md
    • @azure/eventgrid [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      error	Script return with result [failed] code [2] signal [null] cwd [azure-sdk-for-js/azure-sdk-for-js/sdk/eventgrid/eventgrid]: npm pack --silent
    ️🔄 azure-sdk-for-go inProgress [Detail]
    ️️✔️[Staging] ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @pgrandhi, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
    Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
    If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
    If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.

    @lmazuel lmazuel merged commit b81a30c into master Mar 13, 2021
    @lmazuel lmazuel deleted the user/pgrandhi/AddingCallRecordingEventToACS branch March 13, 2021 00:53
    MirzaSikander pushed a commit to MirzaSikander/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2021
    …ld to SMSDeliveryReportReceived event (Azure#13408)
    
    * Adding CallRecording event to ACS Eventgrid Schema and adding tag field to SMSDeliveryReportReceived event
    
    * Prettier run fix
    
    * Removing breakchanges caused by  type:object
    
    * Removing breakchanges caused by type:object
    mkarmark pushed a commit to mkarmark/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2021
    …ld to SMSDeliveryReportReceived event (Azure#13408)
    
    * Adding CallRecording event to ACS Eventgrid Schema and adding tag field to SMSDeliveryReportReceived event
    
    * Prettier run fix
    
    * Removing breakchanges caused by  type:object
    
    * Removing breakchanges caused by type:object
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants