Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resource mover new api version 2021-01-01 #12731

Merged

Conversation

ajaygit158
Copy link
Member

@ajaygit158 ajaygit158 commented Jan 29, 2021

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Changelog

Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When you are targeting to deploy new service/feature to public regions? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
  3. When you expect to publish swagger? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
  4. If it's an update to existing version, please select SDKs of specific language and CLIs that require refresh after swagger is published.
    • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • SDK of Go
    • PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • No, no need to refresh for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.

    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
    • Adding a new service
  • Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from API Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in stable version
  • Removing properties in stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in stable version
  • Updating API in stable version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in preview over 1 year

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jan 29, 2021

Swagger Validation Report

️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️❌LintDiff: 5 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]

Rule Message
R4009 - RequiredSystemDataInNewApiVersions The response of operation:'MoveCollections_Create' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response.
New: Microsoft.Migrate/stable/2021-01-01/resourcemovercollection.json#L17
R4009 - RequiredSystemDataInNewApiVersions The response of operation:'MoveCollections_Update' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response.
New: Microsoft.Migrate/stable/2021-01-01/resourcemovercollection.json#L76
R4009 - RequiredSystemDataInNewApiVersions The response of operation:'MoveCollections_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response.
New: Microsoft.Migrate/stable/2021-01-01/resourcemovercollection.json#L182
R4009 - RequiredSystemDataInNewApiVersions The response of operation:'MoveResources_Create' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response.
New: Microsoft.Migrate/stable/2021-01-01/resourcemovercollection.json#L714
R4009 - RequiredSystemDataInNewApiVersions The response of operation:'MoveResources_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response.
New: Microsoft.Migrate/stable/2021-01-01/resourcemovercollection.json#L833
️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on preview version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.

️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on stable version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @ajaygit158 Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jan 29, 2021

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ azure-resource-manager-schemas succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 4e21b58. Schema Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	npx n 12
      command	autorest --use=@autorest/azureresourceschema@3.0.92 --version=3.0.6369 --azureresourceschema --multiapi --title=none --pass-thru:subset-reducer --azureresourceschema-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-resource-manager-schemas/azure-resource-manager-schemas ../../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/resourcemover/resource-manager/readme.md
    • ️✔️resourcemover [View full logs]  [Release Schema Changes]
      cmderr	[resource-manager] node-pre-gyp
      cmderr	[resource-manager] WARN
      cmderr	[resource-manager] Using request for node-pre-gyp https download
      cmderr	[resource-manager]  template-schema-validation-tools@1.0.0 No repository field.
      cmderr	[resource-manager]  SKIPPING OPTIONAL DEPENDENCY: fsevents@2.1.3 (node_modules/fsevents):
      cmderr	[resource-manager]  SKIPPING OPTIONAL DEPENDENCY: Unsupported platform for fsevents@2.1.3: wanted {"os":"darwin","arch":"any"} (current: {"os":"linux","arch":"x64"})
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 4e21b58. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./initScript.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	go run ./tools/generator/main.go ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️resourcemover/mgmt/2021-01-01/resourcemover [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] This is a new package
    • ️✔️preview/resourcemover/mgmt/2019-10-01-preview/resourcemover [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      Only show 60 items here, please refer to log for details.
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NetworkSecurityGroupResourceSettings.AsKeyVaultResourceSettings() (*KeyVaultResourceSettings, bool)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `UnresolvedDependencyCollectionPage.Values() []UnresolvedDependency`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `DiskEncryptionSetResourceSettings.AsNetworkInterfaceResourceSettings() (*NetworkInterfaceResourceSettings, bool)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `DiskEncryptionSetResourceSettings.AsSQLDatabaseResourceSettings() (*SQLDatabaseResourceSettings, bool)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `SQLElasticPoolResourceSettings.AsKeyVaultResourceSettings() (*KeyVaultResourceSettings, bool)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `SQLDatabaseResourceSettings.AsDiskEncryptionSetResourceSettings() (*DiskEncryptionSetResourceSettings, bool)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NewUnresolvedDependencyCollectionIterator(UnresolvedDependencyCollectionPage) UnresolvedDependencyCollectionIterator`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `PublicIPAddressResourceSettings.AsKeyVaultResourceSettings() (*KeyVaultResourceSettings, bool)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `MoveCollectionProperties.MarshalJSON() ([]byte, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `DiskEncryptionSetResourceSettings.AsVirtualMachineResourceSettings() (*VirtualMachineResourceSettings, bool)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `*UnresolvedDependencyCollectionPage.NextWithContext(context.Context) error`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `KeyVaultResourceSettings.AsVirtualMachineResourceSettings() (*VirtualMachineResourceSettings, bool)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `KeyVaultResourceSettings.AsLoadBalancerResourceSettings() (*LoadBalancerResourceSettings, bool)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `SQLDatabaseResourceSettings.AsKeyVaultResourceSettings() (*KeyVaultResourceSettings, bool)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NewUnresolvedDependencyCollectionPage(UnresolvedDependencyCollection, func(context.Context, UnresolvedDependencyCollection) (UnresolvedDependencyCollection, error)) UnresolvedDependencyCollectionPage`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `DiskEncryptionSetResourceSettings.MarshalJSON() ([]byte, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `DiskEncryptionSetResourceSettings.AsVirtualNetworkResourceSettings() (*VirtualNetworkResourceSettings, bool)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `KeyVaultResourceSettings.AsSQLDatabaseResourceSettings() (*SQLDatabaseResourceSettings, bool)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `MoveCollectionsClient.ListRequiredForPreparer(context.Context, string, string, string) (*http.Request, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `MoveResourceCollection.MarshalJSON() ([]byte, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `ResourceGroupResourceSettings.AsDiskEncryptionSetResourceSettings() (*DiskEncryptionSetResourceSettings, bool)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `*UnresolvedDependencyCollectionPage.Next() error`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `KeyVaultResourceSettings.AsNetworkInterfaceResourceSettings() (*NetworkInterfaceResourceSettings, bool)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NetworkInterfaceResourceSettings.AsDiskEncryptionSetResourceSettings() (*DiskEncryptionSetResourceSettings, bool)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `AvailabilitySetResourceSettings.AsKeyVaultResourceSettings() (*KeyVaultResourceSettings, bool)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `*UnresolvedDependencyCollectionIterator.NextWithContext(context.Context) error`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `UnresolvedDependencyCollection.IsEmpty() bool`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `*UnresolvedDependencyCollectionIterator.Next() error`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `DiskEncryptionSetResourceSettings.AsBasicResourceSettings() (BasicResourceSettings, bool)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `UnresolvedDependencyCollectionIterator.Response() UnresolvedDependencyCollection`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `AvailabilitySetResourceSettings.AsDiskEncryptionSetResourceSettings() (*DiskEncryptionSetResourceSettings, bool)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `DiskEncryptionSetResourceSettings.AsPublicIPAddressResourceSettings() (*PublicIPAddressResourceSettings, bool)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `DiskEncryptionSetResourceSettings.AsSQLElasticPoolResourceSettings() (*SQLElasticPoolResourceSettings, bool)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `NetworkInterfaceResourceSettings.AsKeyVaultResourceSettings() (*KeyVaultResourceSettings, bool)`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `DiskEncryptionSetResourceSettings`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `KeyVaultResourceSettings`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `MoveCollectionPropertiesErrors`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `NsgReference`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `PublicIPReference`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `RequiredForResourcesCollection`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `Summary`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `SummaryCollection`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `UnresolvedDependenciesFilter`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `UnresolvedDependenciesFilterProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `UnresolvedDependencyCollectionIterator`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `UnresolvedDependencyCollectionPage`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `IsResolveRequired` in struct `MoveResourceProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Etag` in struct `MoveCollection`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `SummaryCollection` in struct `MoveResourceCollection`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `TotalCount` in struct `MoveResourceCollection`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `NetworkSecurityGroup` in struct `SubnetResourceSettings`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `LoadBalancerNatRules` in struct `NicIPConfigurationResourceSettings`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `PublicIP` in struct `NicIPConfigurationResourceSettings`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Fqdn` in struct `PublicIPAddressResourceSettings`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `SummaryCollection` in struct `UnresolvedDependencyCollection`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `TotalCount` in struct `UnresolvedDependencyCollection`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Errors` in struct `MoveCollectionProperties`
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 10 breaking change(s), 117 additive change(s).
      info	[Changelog]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 4e21b58. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	autorest --version=V2 --typescript --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.typescript@4.4.4 --typescript-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-js/azure-sdk-for-js ../../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/resourcemover/resource-manager/readme.md
    • ️✔️resourcemover [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      cmderr	[npmPack] loaded rollup.config.js with warnings
      cmderr	[npmPack] (!) Unused external imports
      cmderr	[npmPack] default imported from external module 'rollup' but never used
      cmderr	[npmPack] ./esm/resourceMoverServiceAPI.js → ./dist/resourcemover.js...
      cmderr	[npmPack] created ./dist/resourcemover.js in 391ms
    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 4e21b58. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] Ignoring mock: markers 'python_version <= "2.7"' don't match your environment
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh]   Failed building wheel for ConfigArgParse
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh]   Failed building wheel for wrapt
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh]   Failed building wheel for yarl
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh]   Failed building wheel for multidict
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] Cannot uninstall requirement azure-nspkg, not installed
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] Command '['/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/venv-sdk/bin/python', '-m', 'pip', 'uninstall', '-y', 'azure-nspkg']' returned non-zero exit status 1.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmdout	[automation_generate.sh] [Autorest]/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/venv-sdk/auto_temp.json does not exist!!!Error happened during codegen
      error	Script return with result [failed] code [1] signal [null] cwd [azure-sdk-for-python]: sh scripts/automation_generate.sh
      warn	Skip package processing as generation is failed
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 4e21b58. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-04 01:46:23 INFO [VERSION][Not Found] cannot find version for "com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-resourcemover"
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-04 01:46:23 INFO [VERSION][Not Found] cannot find stable version, current version "1.0.0-beta.1"
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-04 01:46:23 INFO autorest --version=3.0.6350 --use=@autorest/java@4.0.11 --java.azure-libraries-for-java-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java --java.output-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java/sdk/resourcemover/azure-resourcemanager-resourcemover --java.namespace=com.azure.resourcemanager.resourcemover   --java --pipeline.modelerfour.additional-checks=false --pipeline.modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication=true --azure-arm --verbose --sdk-integration --fluent=lite --java.fluent=lite --java.license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_SMALL ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/resourcemover/resource-manager/readme.md
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-04 01:47:12 INFO [CI][Success] Write to ci.yml
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-04 01:47:12 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with pom.xml
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-04 01:47:12 INFO [POM][Skip] pom already has module azure-resourcemanager-resourcemover
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-04 01:47:12 INFO [POM][Success] Write to pom.xml
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-04 01:47:12 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with root pom
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-04 01:47:12 INFO [POM][Success] Write to root pom
      cmderr	[generate.py] WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred
      cmderr	[generate.py] WARNING: Illegal reflective access by org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.ReflectionUtils (file:/home/vsts/.m2/repository/org/codehaus/groovy/groovy/3.0.0-beta-2/groovy-3.0.0-beta-2-indy.jar) to method java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableCollection.toString()
      cmderr	[generate.py] WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.ReflectionUtils
      cmderr	[generate.py] WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal reflective access operations
      cmderr	[generate.py] WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release
    • ️✔️azure-resourcemanager-resourcemover [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-02-04 01:50:44 DEBUG Got artifact_id: azure-resourcemanager-resourcemover
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-02-04 01:50:44 DEBUG Got artifact: pom.xml
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-02-04 01:50:44 DEBUG Got artifact: azure-resourcemanager-resourcemover-1.0.0-beta.1.jar
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-02-04 01:50:44 DEBUG Match jar package: azure-resourcemanager-resourcemover-1.0.0-beta.1.jar
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-02-04 01:50:44 DEBUG output: {"full": "```sh\ncurl -L \"https://portal.azure-devex-tools.com/api/sdk-dl-pub?p=Azure/12731/azure-sdk-for-java/azure-resourcemanager-resourcemover/azure-resourcemanager-resourcemover-1.0.0-beta.1.jar\" -o azure-resourcemanager-resourcemover-1.0.0-beta.1.jar\nmvn install:install-file -DgroupId=com.azure.resourcemanager -DartifactId=azure-resourcemanager-resourcemover -Dversion=1.0.0-beta.0 -Dfile=azure-resourcemanager-resourcemover-1.0.0-beta.1.jar -Dpackaging=jar -DgeneratePom=true
      ```"}
    ️️✔️[Staging] ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @ajaygit158, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff.

    TaskHow to fixPrioritySupport (Microsoft alias)
    AvocadoFix-AvocadoHighruowan
    Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHighraychen, jianyxi
    Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHighraychen,jianyxi
    LintDiffFix-LintDiffhighjianyxi, ruoxuan
    If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback."

    @dukum
    Copy link
    Member

    dukum commented Jan 29, 2021

    /azp run

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Commenter does not have sufficient privileges for PR 12731 in repo Azure/azure-rest-api-specs

    @ajaygit158
    Copy link
    Member Author

    /azp run

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s).

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi, @ajaygit158 your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board(armapireview@microsoft.com). cc @raych1

    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Feb 1, 2021
    @pilor pilor removed their assignment Feb 1, 2021
    @jorgecotillo jorgecotillo self-assigned this Feb 2, 2021
    @jorgecotillo jorgecotillo added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Feb 2, 2021
    @raych1
    Copy link
    Member

    raych1 commented Feb 3, 2021

    @msyyc, can you please have a look at python SDK check failures?

    @ArcturusZhang
    Copy link
    Member

    @raych1 this PR did not change anything of the package that is reporting breaking changes - therefore we could ignore the breaking changes warnings for go SDK

    @msyyc
    Copy link
    Member

    msyyc commented Feb 3, 2021

    For python, It is a known issue and we will fix it soon. Please ignore it now

    @ajaygit158 ajaygit158 removed the DoNotMerge <valid label in PR review process> use to hold merge after approval label Feb 3, 2021
    @ajaygit158 ajaygit158 changed the title [Do not merge] resource mover new api version Resource mover new api version 2021-01-01 Feb 3, 2021
    @raych1
    Copy link
    Member

    raych1 commented Feb 3, 2021

    @akning-ms , please force merge this PR since python sdk failure is known issue, thanks.

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Approved-LintDiff ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review CI-BreakingChange-Go CI-FixRequiredOnFailure
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    9 participants