Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate EXPORT to 7.3-preview #12320

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 26, 2021
Merged

Migrate EXPORT to 7.3-preview #12320

merged 8 commits into from
Jan 26, 2021

Conversation

herveyw-msft
Copy link
Contributor

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Changelog

Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When you are targeting to deploy new service/feature to public regions? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
  3. When you expect to publish swagger? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
  4. If it's an update to existing version, please select SDKs of specific language and CLIs that require refresh after swagger is published.
    • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • SDK of Go
    • PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • No, no need to refresh for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.

    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
    • Adding a new service
  • Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from API Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in stable version
  • Removing properties in stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in stable version
  • Updating API in stable version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in preview over 1 year

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @herveyw-msft Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jan 7, 2021

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️❌BreakingChange: 22 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail] Only 10 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    1005 - RemovedPath The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/keys/{key-name}/{key-version}/export' removed or restructured?
    Old: Microsoft.KeyVault/preview/7.2-preview/keys.json#L811:5
    1006 - RemovedDefinition The new version is missing a definition that was found in the old version. Was 'KeyReleasePolicy' removed or renamed?
    New: Microsoft.KeyVault/preview/7.2-preview/keys.json#L977:3
    Old: Microsoft.KeyVault/preview/7.2-preview/keys.json#L1035:3
    1006 - RemovedDefinition The new version is missing a definition that was found in the old version. Was 'KeyExportParameters' removed or renamed?
    New: Microsoft.KeyVault/preview/7.2-preview/keys.json#L977:3
    Old: Microsoft.KeyVault/preview/7.2-preview/keys.json#L1035:3
    1008 - ModifiedOperationId The operation id has been changed from 'exportKey' to 'export'. This will impact generated code.
    New: Microsoft.KeyVault/preview/7.3-preview/keys.json#L812:7
    Old: Microsoft.KeyVault/preview/7.3-preview/keys.json#L812:7
    1019 - RemovedEnumValue The new version is removing enum value(s) 'export' from the old version.
    New: Microsoft.KeyVault/preview/7.2-preview/keys.json#L1376:11
    Old: Microsoft.KeyVault/preview/7.2-preview/keys.json#L1460:11
    1019 - RemovedEnumValue The new version is removing enum value(s) 'export' from the old version.
    New: Microsoft.KeyVault/preview/7.2-preview/keys.json#L1639:11
    Old: Microsoft.KeyVault/preview/7.2-preview/keys.json#L1746:11
    1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'exportable' renamed or removed?
    New: Microsoft.KeyVault/preview/7.2-preview/keys.json#L1138:7
    Old: Microsoft.KeyVault/preview/7.2-preview/keys.json#L1196:7
    1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'release_policy' renamed or removed?
    New: Microsoft.KeyVault/preview/7.2-preview/keys.json#L1346:7
    Old: Microsoft.KeyVault/preview/7.2-preview/keys.json#L1430:7
    1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'release_policy' renamed or removed?
    New: Microsoft.KeyVault/preview/7.2-preview/keys.json#L1198:7
    Old: Microsoft.KeyVault/preview/7.2-preview/keys.json#L1260:7
    1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'release_policy' renamed or removed?
    New: Microsoft.KeyVault/preview/7.2-preview/keys.json#L1427:7
    Old: Microsoft.KeyVault/preview/7.2-preview/keys.json#L1516:7
    ️️✔️LintDiff succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for LintDiff.

    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on preview version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on stable version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jan 7, 2021

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 612f78a. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./initScript.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	go run ./tools/generator/main.go ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️keyvault/v7.1/keyvault [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    • ️✔️keyvault/v7.0/keyvault [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    • ️✔️keyvault/2016-10-01/keyvault [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    • ️✔️keyvault/2015-06-01/keyvault [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    • ️✔️preview/keyvault/v7.2-preview/keyvault [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      Only show 24 items here, please refer to log for details.
      info	[Changelog] - New function `RoleDefinitionsClient.GetResponder(*http.Response) (RoleDefinition, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `RoleDefinitionsClient.DeletePreparer(context.Context, string, string, string) (*http.Request, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `PossibleRoleScopeValues() []RoleScope`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `PossibleRoleDefinitionTypeValues() []RoleDefinitionType`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `RoleDefinitionsClient.CreateOrUpdatePreparer(context.Context, string, string, string, RoleDefinitionCreateParameters) (*http.Request, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `PossibleDataActionValues() []DataAction`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `RoleDefinitionsClient.CreateOrUpdateResponder(*http.Response) (RoleDefinition, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `RoleDefinitionsClient.Delete(context.Context, string, string, string) (RoleDefinition, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `RoleDefinitionsClient.CreateOrUpdateSender(*http.Request) (*http.Response, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `RoleDefinitionsClient.CreateOrUpdate(context.Context, string, string, string, RoleDefinitionCreateParameters) (RoleDefinition, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `RoleDefinitionsClient.GetSender(*http.Request) (*http.Response, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `RoleDefinitionsClient.DeleteSender(*http.Request) (*http.Response, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `RoleDefinitionsClient.DeleteResponder(*http.Response) (RoleDefinition, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `PossibleRoleTypeValues() []RoleType`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `RoleDefinitionsClient.Get(context.Context, string, string, string) (RoleDefinition, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New function `RoleDefinitionsClient.GetPreparer(context.Context, string, string, string) (*http.Request, error)`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `RoleDefinitionCreateParameters`
      info	[Changelog] - New anonymous field `autorest.Response` in struct `RoleDefinition`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Iv` in struct `KeyOperationResult`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `AuthenticationTag` in struct `KeyOperationResult`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `AdditionalAuthenticatedData` in struct `KeyOperationResult`
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 20 breaking change(s), 54 additive change(s).
      info	[Changelog]
    ️️✔️[Staging] ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @herveyw-msft, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff.

    TaskHow to fixPrioritySupport (Microsoft alias)
    AvocadoFix-AvocadoHighruowan
    Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHighraychen, jianyxi
    Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHighraychen,jianyxi
    LintDiffFix-LintDiffhighjianyxi, ruoxuan
    If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback."

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @herveyw-msft, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
    Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
    If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
    If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.

    @@ -1616,7 +1623,7 @@
    "description": "The target environment assertion."
    }
    },
    "description": "The export key parameters.",
    "description": "The release key parameters.",
    Copy link
    Contributor

    @daviddesberg daviddesberg Jan 7, 2021

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    The key release parameters rather than release key parameters (nit)

    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    I think its equivalent ;-)

    ],
    "operationId": "releaseKey",
    "summary": "Releases a key.",
    "description": "The release key operation is applicable to all key types. The target key must be marked exportable. This operation requires the keys/release permission.",
    Copy link
    Member

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Should this differentiate between export and release? To be honest, I'm not entirely sure on the difference either and I'm sure customers will raise the question later.

    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Export is the reverse of Import. Release is a specialized Export used with Trusted Execution Environments. They are separated to enable more granular access control as Export must be closely controlled.

    Copy link
    Member

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    That's what I thought :) but I would put something to that effect in the description. I anticipate customers will have this same question, and these descriptions should also end up being the default doc comments for the SDK code.

    "version": {
    "description": "key release policy version",
    "contentType": {
    "description": "Content type and version of key release policy",
    Copy link
    Member

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Should reword this to fit the value, like "Content type, policy schema version, and optional content encoding of the key release policy"

    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    This was just copied over from the original 7.2-preview file.

    Copy link
    Member

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Understood, but we've collectively made doc improvements in the past. ;) Consider this a nit, though.

    @herveyw-msft
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    Breaking Changes: the PR modifies an existing Preview protocol version to move capabilities that will not be finalized until a later version. As a result, the check identify these moves as breaking changes but the original protocol version was never final.

    @tjprescott
    Copy link
    Member

    @herveyw-msft we can certainly override the breaking change flag from the CI based on that circumstance, but it looks like there are other failing CI checks that need to be addressed first.

    @tjprescott
    Copy link
    Member

    /azp run

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s).

    @tjprescott
    Copy link
    Member

    Please address the Required CI failures.

    Copy link
    Member

    @heaths heaths left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    I realized that you also need to remove the export key operation.

    /cc @lusitanian

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    NewApiVersionRequired reason:

    A service’s API is a contract with customers and is represented by using the api-version query parameter. Changes such as adding an optional property to a request/response or introducing a new operation is a change to the service’s contract and therefore requires a new api-version value. This is critically important for documentation, client libraries, and customer support.

    EXAMPLE: if a customer calls a service in the public cloud using api-version=2020-07-27, the new property or operation may exist but if they call the service in a government cloud, air-gapped cloud, or Azure Stack Hub cloud using the same api-version, the property or operation may not exist. Because there is no clear relationship between the service api-version and the new property/operation, customers can’t trust the documentation and Azure customer have difficulty helping customers diagnose issues. In addition, each client library version documents the service version it supports. When an optional property or new operation is added to a service and its Swagger, new client libraries must be produced to expose this functionality to customers. Without updating the api-version, it is unclear to customers which version of a client library supports these new features.

    @herveyw-msft
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    I realized that you also need to remove the export key operation.

    /cc @lusitanian

    Fixed in the changes from a rebase and model validation updates.

    @lmazuel lmazuel merged commit 612f78a into Azure:master Jan 26, 2021
    mkarmark pushed a commit to mkarmark/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2021
    * Migrate EXPORT to 7.3-preview
    
    * Correct syntax issues in examples
    
    * Fix ExportKey example
    
    * Remove exportabe from 7.2, fix -HSM text, fix Export example
    
    * Fix prettier issues
    
    * Add files for 7.3-preview to readme.md
    
    * Fix model validation issues
    
    * Fix JsonWebKeyOperation double definition mismatch
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    5 participants