-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 501
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Stream payload to ExecuteStoredProcedureStreamAsync #1061
Add Stream payload to ExecuteStoredProcedureStreamAsync #1061
Conversation
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s). |
/azp run |
Commenter does not have sufficient privileges for PR 1061 in repo Azure/azure-cosmos-dotnet-v3 |
Worth a shot :D |
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s). |
Wow, you guys have quite the test suite. I've updated my local environment so that I can actually run them all. Previously, most failed so I just ignored failures. FYI Microsoft.Azure.Cosmos.Tests -> AsyncCacheTest -> TestCancelOnOneThreadCancelsOtherTaskIfCanceled still fails for me. |
Unrelated to this PR - just a question: azure-cosmos-dotnet-v3/Microsoft.Azure.Cosmos/tests/Microsoft.Azure.Cosmos.Tests/AsyncCacheTest.cs Line 168 in 94d517b
This assertion is what fails the test when I run it locally. The assertion doesn't seem to make sense - it's a race condition at best. After the cancellationTokenSource is .Cancel()'ed, getTask1 can complete at any time, including immediately. What's your approach to stuff like this? Leave it alone unless it's actually causing trouble in the pipeline? Raise an issue and let the test owner fix it? Hope for a PR lol? |
Create an issue for the failing test. Someone will investigate it. It probably won't be until next week. What's interesting is the test seems to be passing in the gates. Please make sure to put the OS you are running. |
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s). |
Test failed due to ... Probably transient. |
Could I get a friendly neighborhood /azp run por favor? |
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s). |
#1059 updated with more context and follow-up. |
changelog.md conflicts are now resolved. |
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s). |
@ealsur can you please take a look a the tests and any new coverage needed? |
Failing test - probably transient:
|
Microsoft.Azure.Cosmos/tests/Microsoft.Azure.Cosmos.EmulatorTests/StoredProcedureTests.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…: Unparseable json, not-an-object, "null" literal, and array-like objects
/asp run |
azp? :D |
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s). |
There seems to be a build error from the merge with master. |
You silly goose, why do you update master behind my back :D Ok, will investigate. |
Sorry! It should be as simple as:
|
No problem. Synced up from Azure/master, made the changes and should be good to go |
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s). |
Various connectivity errors to nuget:
Either nuget has exploded permanently, or hopefully it's transient |
Description
#1059
This adds an overload to ExecuteStoredProcedureStreamAsync which accepts a
Stream
payload representing the parameters. The original only accepteddynamic[]
, which must be serialized.Type of change
Closing issues
closes #1059