Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI] fix wrong usage of subprocess.check_call() in Linter #1392

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 13, 2020

Conversation

haroldrandom
Copy link
Contributor

@haroldrandom haroldrandom commented Mar 13, 2020

Wrong usage of Python subprocess.check_call().

Test on https://github.com/haroldrandom/azure-cli-extensions/pull/new/fix-linter-bug, job "LinterOnModifiedExtension" passed is expected.
The current behavior on PR #1367 is not right.


This checklist is used to make sure that common guidelines for a pull request are followed.

General Guidelines

  • Have you run azdev style <YOUR_EXT> locally? (pip install azdev required)
  • Have you run python scripts/ci/test_index.py -q locally?

For new extensions:

About Extension Publish

There is a pipeline to automatically build, upload and publish extension wheels.
Once your PR is merged into master branch, a new PR will be created to update src/index.json automatically.
The precondition is to put your code inside this repo and upgrade the version in the PR but do not modify src/index.json.

@haroldrandom haroldrandom requested a review from yonzhan March 13, 2020 16:08
@haroldrandom haroldrandom self-assigned this Mar 13, 2020
Copy link
Collaborator

@yonzhan yonzhan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@haroldrandom haroldrandom merged commit f9e8dc9 into Azure:master Mar 13, 2020
@haroldrandom haroldrandom deleted the fix-linter-bug branch March 13, 2020 16:22
ManuInNZ pushed a commit to ManuInNZ/azure-cli-extensions that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants