Skip to content

Conversation

@ludamad
Copy link
Collaborator

@ludamad ludamad commented Mar 1, 2023

Description

Please provide a paragraph or two giving a summary of the change, including relevant motivation and context.

Checklist:

  • I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line.
  • Every change is related to the PR description.
  • I have linked this pull request to the issue(s) that it resolves.
  • There are no unexpected formatting changes, superfluous debug logs, or commented-out code.
  • The branch has been rebased against the head of its merge target.
  • I'm happy for the PR to be merged at the reviewer's next convenience.

@ludamad ludamad marked this pull request as ready for review March 2, 2023 13:24
@ludamad ludamad changed the title feat(json-rpc): sketch of package feat(json-rpc): initial package Mar 2, 2023
@LeilaWang LeilaWang changed the base branch from stage to dev March 2, 2023 15:59

```
const wallet = new JsonRpcClient<WalletImplementation>('wallet-server.com', /*register classes*/ {PublicKey, TxRequest});
const response = await wallet.rpc.signTxRequest(accountPubKey, txRequest);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we make it call the methods directly from the client: wallet.signTxRequest?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ludamad ludamad Mar 7, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorta. You need a proxy object to do this, I don't think you can do new ... and have something end up a proxy object. If we instead had a createRpcClient function we could do it. It could just return the .rpc object

@ludamad ludamad closed this Mar 21, 2023
@charlielye charlielye deleted the adam/feat/json-rpc branch March 28, 2023 21:20
ludamad pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2023
ludamad pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2023
ludamad pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2023
ludamad added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2024
guipublic added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2024
ludamad added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2024
Overview:
If you are in a scenario where you have a failing call to check_circuit
and wish to get more information out of it than just the gate index, you
can use this feature to get a stack trace, see example below.

Usage instructions:
- On ubuntu (or our mainframe accounts) use `sudo apt-get install
libdw-dev` to support trace printing
- Use `cmake --preset clang16-dbg-fast-circuit-check-traces` and `cmake
--build --preset clang16-dbg-fast-circuit-check-traces` to enable the
backward-cpp dependency through the CHECK_CIRCUIT_STACKTRACES CMake
variable.
- Run any case where you have a failing check_circuit call, you will now
have a stack trace illuminating where this constraint was added in code.

Caveats:
- This works best for code that is not overly generic, i.e. where just
the sequence of function calls carries a lot of information. It is
possible to tag extra data along with the stack trace, this can be done
as a followup, please leave feedback if desired.
- There are certain functions like `assert_equals` that can cause gates
that occur _before_ them to fail. If this would be useful to
automatically report, please leave feedback.

Example:
```
[ RUN      ] standard_circuit_constructor.test_check_circuit_broken
Stack trace (most recent call last):
#4    Source "_deps/gtest-src/googletest/src/gtest.cc", line 2845, in Run
       2842:   if (!Test::HasFatalFailure() && !Test::IsSkipped()) {
       2843:     // This doesn't throw as all user code that can throw are wrapped into
       2844:     // exception handling code.
      >2845:     test->Run();
       2846:   }
       2847: 
       2848:   if (test != nullptr) {
#3    Source "_deps/gtest-src/googletest/src/gtest.cc", line 2696, in Run
       2693:   // GTEST_SKIP().
       2694:   if (!HasFatalFailure() && !IsSkipped()) {
       2695:     impl->os_stack_trace_getter()->UponLeavingGTest();
      >2696:     internal::HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported(this, &Test::TestBody,
       2697:                                                   "the test body");
       2698:   }
#2  | Source "_deps/gtest-src/googletest/src/gtest.cc", line 2657, in HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>
    |  2655: #if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
    |  2656:     try {
    | >2657:       return HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported(object, method, location);
    |  2658:     } catch (const AssertionException&) {  // NOLINT
    |  2659:       // This failure was reported already.
      Source "_deps/gtest-src/googletest/src/gtest.cc", line 2621, in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>
       2618:   }
       2619: #else
       2620:   (void)location;
      >2621:   return (object->*method)();
       2622: #endif  // GTEST_HAS_SEH
       2623: }
#1    Source "/mnt/user-data/adam/aztec-packages/barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/circuit_checker/standard_circuit_builder.test.cpp", line 464, in TestBody
        461:     uint32_t d_idx = circuit_constructor.add_variable(d);
        462:     circuit_constructor.create_add_gate({ a_idx, b_idx, c_idx, fr::one(), fr::one(), fr::neg_one(), fr::zero() });
        463: 
      > 464:     circuit_constructor.create_add_gate({ d_idx, c_idx, a_idx, fr::one(), fr::neg_one(), fr::neg_one(), fr::zero() });
        465: 
        466:     bool result = CircuitChecker::check(circuit_constructor);
        467:     EXPECT_EQ(result, false);
#0    Source "/mnt/user-data/adam/aztec-packages/barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/stdlib_circuit_builders/standard_circuit_builder.cpp", line 22, in create_add_gate
         19: {
         20:     this->assert_valid_variables({ in.a, in.b, in.c });
         21: 
      >  22:     blocks.arithmetic.populate_wires(in.a, in.b, in.c);
         23:     blocks.arithmetic.q_m().emplace_back(FF::zero());
         24:     blocks.arithmetic.q_1().emplace_back(in.a_scaling);
         25:     blocks.arithmetic.q_2().emplace_back(in.b_scaling);
gate number4
```
lucasxia01 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2024
just-mitch added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2025
Should fix some flake in kind network smoke.

Key was the following logs I found in a failing run:

```
spartan-aztec-network-boot-node-0 deploy-create2-deployer Error: 
spartan-aztec-network-boot-node-0 deploy-create2-deployer error sending request for url (http://spartan-aztec-network-ethereum.smoke:8545/)
spartan-aztec-network-boot-node-0 deploy-create2-deployer 
spartan-aztec-network-boot-node-0 deploy-create2-deployer Context:
spartan-aztec-network-boot-node-0 deploy-create2-deployer - Error #0: error sending request for url (http://spartan-aztec-network-ethereum.smoke:8545/)
spartan-aztec-network-boot-node-0 deploy-create2-deployer - Error #1: client error (Connect)
spartan-aztec-network-boot-node-0 deploy-create2-deployer - Error #2: dns error: failed to lookup address information: Name does not resolve
spartan-aztec-network-boot-node-0 deploy-create2-deployer - Error #3: failed to lookup address information: Name does not resolve
```
aminsammara added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2025
ledwards2225 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2025
Cleanup and minor performance related bugfixes for
`cycle_group::_variable_base_batch_mul_internal()`
- Utilize native hints in stdlib straus lookup table construction where
they were erroneously not being used before
- remove duplicate construction of native straus lookup tables (see PR
comments for more details)
- virtually every instance of `emplace_back` was being used incorrectly
- remove `std::optional` logic associated with broken support for
scalars of different sizes (now protected with an assert)
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2025
BEGIN_COMMIT_OVERRIDE
fix: Origin Tags edgecase (#16921)
chore: cycle group cleanup #2 (#16876)
chore: civc tidy 3 (#16671)
refactor(bb): optimize batch_mul_with_endomorphism (#16905)
feat: check op queue wires are zero past minicircuit in Translator
(#16858)
feat: Add CPU scaling benchmark script for remote execution (#16918)
fix: Add free witness tag to field constructor (#16827)
fix(bb): darwin build (#16957)
END_COMMIT_OVERRIDE
Umarb97 pushed a commit to Umarb97/aztec-packages that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2025
Cleanup and minor performance related bugfixes for
`cycle_group::_variable_base_batch_mul_internal()`
- Utilize native hints in stdlib straus lookup table construction where
they were erroneously not being used before
- remove duplicate construction of native straus lookup tables (see PR
comments for more details)
- virtually every instance of `emplace_back` was being used incorrectly
- remove `std::optional` logic associated with broken support for
scalars of different sizes (now protected with an assert)
mralj pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2025
Cleanup and minor performance related bugfixes for
`cycle_group::_variable_base_batch_mul_internal()`
- Utilize native hints in stdlib straus lookup table construction where
they were erroneously not being used before
- remove duplicate construction of native straus lookup tables (see PR
comments for more details)
- virtually every instance of `emplace_back` was being used incorrectly
- remove `std::optional` logic associated with broken support for
scalars of different sizes (now protected with an assert)
ludamad pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2025
ludamad pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2025
Cleanup and minor performance related bugfixes for
`cycle_group::_variable_base_batch_mul_internal()`
- Utilize native hints in stdlib straus lookup table construction where
they were erroneously not being used before
- remove duplicate construction of native straus lookup tables (see PR
comments for more details)
- virtually every instance of `emplace_back` was being used incorrectly
- remove `std::optional` logic associated with broken support for
scalars of different sizes (now protected with an assert)
chrismarino added a commit to chrismarino/aztec-packages that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants