-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 587
Open
Labels
T-feature-requestType: Adding a brand new feature (not to be confused with improving an existing feature).Type: Adding a brand new feature (not to be confused with improving an existing feature).from-communityThis originated from the community :)This originated from the community :)
Description
Problem Statement
Any fees earned by a sequencer operator are currently sent to an L2 address, set through feeRecipient. But if the given sequencer is operated by a sequencer operator with delegated funds, that user would expect to get their fair share of earned feeRecipient fees.
But also as an operator I don't want to manage the process of sending those fees to L1, and then sending it to the correct splits address manually.
Proposed Solution
A solution could be pooling the feeRecipient into one address per operator, having the node automatically send it to L1 and splitting it equally across all splits contracts. This is still tough given the accounting that will have to be done for when certain delegators delegated / undelegated.
Example Use Case
No response
Alternative Solutions
No response
Additional Context
No response
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
T-feature-requestType: Adding a brand new feature (not to be confused with improving an existing feature).Type: Adding a brand new feature (not to be confused with improving an existing feature).from-communityThis originated from the community :)This originated from the community :)