-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 812
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Repo Gardening: add check for a [Type] label on PRs #40428
Conversation
See p1HpG7-uPQ-p2#comment-74890
Thank you for your PR! When contributing to Jetpack, we have a few suggestions that can help us test and review your patch:
This comment will be updated as you work on your PR and make changes. If you think that some of those checks are not needed for your PR, please explain why you think so. Thanks for cooperation 🤖 The e2e test report can be found here. Please note that it can take a few minutes after the e2e tests checks are complete for the report to be available. Follow this PR Review Process:
Still unsure? Reach out in #jetpack-developers for guidance! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks reasonable.
hasTesting, | ||
hasPrivacy, | ||
projectsWithoutChangelog, | ||
hasChangelogEntries: projectsWithoutChangelog.length === 0, | ||
isFromContributor, | ||
hasTypeLabels, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd probably move this up next to hasStatusLabels
, but it doesn't really matter.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Done in 0dc30d4
See #40428 (comment) Co-authored-by: anomiex <anomiex@users.noreply.github.com>
* Repo Gardening: add check for a [Type] label on PRs See p1HpG7-uPQ-p2#comment-74890 * Avoid an additional call to get all labels * Move it up for more readability See Automattic/jetpack#40428 (comment) Co-authored-by: anomiex <anomiex@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: anomiex <anomiex@users.noreply.github.com> Committed via a GitHub action: https://github.com/Automattic/jetpack/actions/runs/12142627587 Upstream-Ref: Automattic/jetpack@eafa13a
* Repo Gardening: add check for a [Type] label on PRs See p1HpG7-uPQ-p2#comment-74890 * Avoid an additional call to get all labels * Move it up for more readability See Automattic/jetpack#40428 (comment) Co-authored-by: anomiex <anomiex@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: anomiex <anomiex@users.noreply.github.com> Committed via a GitHub action: https://github.com/Automattic/jetpack/actions/runs/12142627587 Upstream-Ref: Automattic/jetpack@eafa13a
Follow-up to #40428. Let's try to automate the addition of "Type" labels to each PR. When PR includes changelog files, and when that PR does not already has a [Type] label, let's scan the contents of the changelog files, pick the first "Type" definition we can find, and match that to one of our existing Type labels.
Proposed changes:
Let's start recommending to PR authors that they include a [Type] label in their PR.
Other information:
Jetpack product discussion
p1HpG7-uPQ-p2#comment-74890
Does this pull request change what data or activity we track or use?
No
Testing instructions:
This can be tested in a fork. Here is an example: