Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
x86/intel_rdt: Fix cleanup of plr structure on error
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
When a resource group enters pseudo-locksetup mode a pseudo_lock_region is
associated with it. When the user writes to the resource group's schemata
file the CBM of the requested pseudo-locked region is entered into the
pseudo_lock_region struct. If any part of pseudo-lock region creation fails
the resource group will remain in pseudo-locksetup mode with the
pseudo_lock_region associated with it.

In case of failure during pseudo-lock region creation care needs to be
taken to ensure that the pseudo_lock_region struct associated with the
resource group is cleared from any pseudo-locking data - especially the
CBM. This is because the existence of a pseudo_lock_region struct with a
CBM is significant in other areas of the code, for example, the display of
bit_usage and initialization of a new resource group.

Fix the error path of pseudo-lock region creation to ensure that the
pseudo_lock_region struct is cleared at each error exit.

Fixes: 018961a ("x86/intel_rdt: Pseudo-lock region creation/removal core")
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com
Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com
Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com
Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com
Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/49b4782f6d204d122cee3499e642b2772a98d2b4.1530421026.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
  • Loading branch information
rchatre authored and KAGA-KOKO committed Jul 3, 2018
1 parent ce730f1 commit 546d3c7
Showing 1 changed file with 17 additions and 5 deletions.
22 changes: 17 additions & 5 deletions arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ static void pseudo_lock_region_clear(struct pseudo_lock_region *plr)
static int pseudo_lock_region_init(struct pseudo_lock_region *plr)
{
struct cpu_cacheinfo *ci;
int ret;
int i;

/* Pick the first cpu we find that is associated with the cache. */
Expand All @@ -298,7 +299,8 @@ static int pseudo_lock_region_init(struct pseudo_lock_region *plr)
if (!cpu_online(plr->cpu)) {
rdt_last_cmd_printf("cpu %u associated with cache not online\n",
plr->cpu);
return -ENODEV;
ret = -ENODEV;
goto out_region;
}

ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(plr->cpu);
Expand All @@ -312,8 +314,11 @@ static int pseudo_lock_region_init(struct pseudo_lock_region *plr)
}
}

ret = -1;
rdt_last_cmd_puts("unable to determine cache line size\n");
return -1;
out_region:
pseudo_lock_region_clear(plr);
return ret;
}

/**
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -365,16 +370,23 @@ static int pseudo_lock_region_alloc(struct pseudo_lock_region *plr)
*/
if (plr->size > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE) {
rdt_last_cmd_puts("requested region exceeds maximum size\n");
return -E2BIG;
ret = -E2BIG;
goto out_region;
}

plr->kmem = kzalloc(plr->size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!plr->kmem) {
rdt_last_cmd_puts("unable to allocate memory\n");
return -ENOMEM;
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out_region;
}

return 0;
ret = 0;
goto out;
out_region:
pseudo_lock_region_clear(plr);
out:
return ret;
}

/**
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 546d3c7

Please sign in to comment.