Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: votes with sockets #222

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 1, 2024
Merged

feat: votes with sockets #222

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 1, 2024

Conversation

userMeh
Copy link
Contributor

@userMeh userMeh commented Jul 1, 2024

Summary 📝

Votes with realtime

Which part of the repository is impacted ?

  • API
  • Client
  • Admin
  • Documentation
  • CI/CD
  • Other

@userMeh userMeh changed the title feat: sockets feat: votes with sockets Jul 1, 2024
@userMeh userMeh self-assigned this Jul 1, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 1, 2024

Coverage Report for API (./apps/api)

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🟢 Lines 89.34% (🎯 80%) 6321 / 7075
🟢 Statements 89.34% (🎯 80%) 6321 / 7075
🟢 Functions 77.27% (🎯 60%) 17 / 22
🟢 Branches 45.86% (🎯 35%) 244 / 532
File Coverage
File Stmts % Branch % Funcs % Lines Uncovered Lines
Changed Files
apps/api/src/handlers/votes.ts 71% 50% 100% 71% 26-27, 42-43, 53-54, 82-83, 98-99, 108-109, 122-123, 143-144, 159-160, 175-176, 190-191, 198-199, 202-203, 206-210, 212-214, 216-218, 220-223, 231-232, 240-241, 247-250, 252-254, 256, 258-260, 262-263
apps/api/src/libs/socket.ts 87.5% 100% 100% 87.5% 14-15
apps/api/src/routes/votes.ts 100% 100% 100% 100%
Generated in workflow #390

@github-actions github-actions bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 1, 2024
@userMeh userMeh merged commit e64313b into main Jul 1, 2024
7 checks passed
@userMeh userMeh deleted the client/feat/socket-votes branch July 1, 2024 13:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant