Skip to content

chore(release): bump desktop to 2026.8.3 - #1565

Merged
Astro-Han merged 1 commit into
devfrom
chore/release-2026-8-3
Aug 17, 2026
Merged

chore(release): bump desktop to 2026.8.3#1565
Astro-Han merged 1 commit into
devfrom
chore/release-2026-8-3

Conversation

@Astro-Han

@Astro-Han Astro-Han commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Bump the PawWork desktop release version from 2026.8.2 to 2026.8.3 in the package manifest and Bun lockfile. This prepares an urgent August stable release and has no separate release-tracking issue.

The release scope since v2026.8.2 contains #1560 (avoid a misleading project reload toast when session status hydration times out), #1563 (restore the user's XDG environment for user-run terminal and shell commands), and the P0 #1562 fix (preserve message chronology after timestamp-derived IDs wrapped and made messages disappear).

Why

The P0 message-order rollover fix needs to reach users through a uniquely versioned, signed, notarized, cross-platform release. The release must pin every artifact to one merged dev commit.

Related Issue

No separate issue; this is release preparation for the already-merged fixes listed above.

Human Review Status

Pending

Review Focus

Confirm the diff changes only the desktop package version and its lockfile workspace entry to 2026.8.3, and that the release scope matches every commit since v2026.8.2.

Risk Notes

No visible UI or copy changed, so screenshots are not applicable. The version controls release asset names and updater metadata across macOS and Windows; all three final targets must build the merged commit. Release notes will be applied to the published GitHub Release only after the real workflow run IDs and pinned commit are known.

How To Verify

Version contract: RED on 2026.8.2, GREEN on 2026.8.3
Release contract tests: 21 passed, 0 failed (release-metadata-contract + release-workflow-contract)
Release typecheck: passed (tsgo -p tsconfig.release.json)
Frozen install: passed with no additional lockfile changes
Diff check: no whitespace errors; exactly two version lines changed
PR CI: all required checks passed; the optional dev-dep-audit reports only the default branch's pre-existing advisories and this PR changes no dependency

Screenshots or Recordings

Not applicable; there are no visible UI or copy changes.

Checklist

How to use this checklist:

  • Tick a box by replacing [ ] with [x]. Do not edit, add, or remove items.
  • The bot-applied label items can only be honestly ticked AFTER the PR is opened and the labeler / priority-triage bots have run — return to the PR description and tick them then.
  • Most items are required. The few that are conditional are explicitly marked (conditional); for those, leave unticked if they truly do not apply and explain why in Risk Notes. All other items must be ticked before requesting human review.
  • Type label — this PR carries exactly one of bug, enhancement, task, documentation. Type labels are author-added; the labeler bot does NOT assign them. Add the label in the GitHub UI, then tick this.
  • Routing labels — this PR carries at least one of app, ui, platform, harness, ci. The labeler bot assigns these on PR open based on changed paths. Confirm the bot's choice (or override if wrong), then tick this.
  • Priority label — this PR carries exactly one of P0, P1, P2, P3. The priority-triage bot suggests one on PR open. Confirm or override, then tick this.
  • Human Review Status above is set to Pending, Approved by @<reviewer>, or Not required: <reason> (default is Pending; "not required" is restricted to bot-authored low-risk PRs).
  • I linked the related issue, or stated in Summary why there is no issue.
  • I described the review focus and any meaningful risks.
  • I replaced the example block in How To Verify with the real verification steps and the key result for each.
  • I did not introduce unrelated refactors, dependencies, generated files, or file changes beyond the stated scope.
  • (conditional) I manually checked visible UI or copy changes when needed, with screenshots or recordings. Leave unticked only if no visible UI or copy changed.
  • (conditional) I considered macOS and Windows impact for platform, packaging, updater, signing, paths, shell, or permissions changes. Leave unticked only if no platform/packaging surface was touched.
  • (conditional) I called out docs, release notes, dependencies, permissions, credentials, deletion behavior, generated content, or local file changes when relevant. Leave unticked only if none of those surfaces was touched.
  • I reviewed the final diff for unrelated changes and suspicious dependency changes.
  • I am targeting dev, and my PR title and commit messages use Conventional Commits in English.

@Astro-Han Astro-Han added task Narrow execution, audit, spike, migration, tracking, or upstream follow-up work P0 Blocking / highest priority platform Electron shell, OS integration, packaging, updater, signing, paths, and permissions ci Continuous integration / GitHub Actions desktop labels Aug 17, 2026

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested priority: P2 (includes non-doc, non-test paths outside the low-risk bucket).

P1/P0 are reserved for maintainer confirmation. Please relabel manually if this is a release blocker, security issue, data-loss risk, or updater/runtime failure.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@Astro-Han, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 21 minutes

Limit details: You’ve used all 1 included review currently available under your plan.

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 55a1eb6b-4f79-41a8-b974-f52cd2cb0319

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 066c0ae and 45aad60.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • bun.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/desktop-electron/package.json

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@Astro-Han
Astro-Han merged commit 40fcb60 into dev Aug 17, 2026
45 of 47 checks passed
@Astro-Han
Astro-Han deleted the chore/release-2026-8-3 branch August 17, 2026 12:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci Continuous integration / GitHub Actions desktop P0 Blocking / highest priority platform Electron shell, OS integration, packaging, updater, signing, paths, and permissions task Narrow execution, audit, spike, migration, tracking, or upstream follow-up work

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant