You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
adjust all int and unsigned int to uint_64 or int32_t.
conditional inclusion of MPFR only if flag provided (GPT)
as suggested in the revision process: maybe it would be easier to merge Polynomial specialisation with the main one? just need to explicitly forbid/allow the differences...
I cannot do this; if a method is missing the compiler does not automatically fall back to the base class, the solution is what I have now: explicitly define all functions again in the specialised class. One other solution that theoretically could work is to remove the whole class specialisation and only specialise a few particular methods in the base class. This will now work here, however, because of the <MaxDeg> template parameter which is a CLASS template for the specialisation, I cannot just convert it to a FUNCTION template in the base class.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
int
andunsigned int
touint_64
orint32_t
.as suggested in the revision process: maybe it would be easier to mergePolynomial
specialisation with the main one? just need to explicitly forbid/allow the differences...I cannot do this; if a method is missing the compiler does not automatically fall back to the base class, the solution is what I have now: explicitly define all functions again in the specialised class. One other solution that theoretically could work is to remove the whole class specialisation and only specialise a few particular methods in the base class. This will now work here, however, because of the
<MaxDeg>
template parameter which is a CLASS template for the specialisation, I cannot just convert it to a FUNCTION template in the base class.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: