added the first draft of unit test framework #1533
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a comprehensive testing infrastructure for the dbt Power User VSCode extension. The changes span multiple files and focus on establishing a robust testing framework using Jest, enhancing code coverage, and improving project configuration. Key additions include a GitHub Actions workflow for automated testing, Jest and NYC configuration, new test suites for various components, and updates to project dependencies and TypeScript configuration. Changes
Suggested Reviewers✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to 8bf02e0 in 1 minute and 48 seconds
More details
- Looked at
1237lines of code in14files - Skipped
2files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4drafted comments based on config settings.
1. src/altimate.ts:690
- Draft comment:
Thefetchfunction here should be consistent with the rest of the file, which usesnode-fetch. Consider usingnode-fetchfor consistency and to avoid potential issues. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
2. src/lib/dependencies.ts:2
- Draft comment:
Please provide explicit return types for the functions in this file to improve readability and maintainability. This applies to other functions in this file as well. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a valid diff hunk.
3. src/manifest/sourceFileWatchersFactory.ts:10
- Draft comment:
Please provide explicit return types for the functions in this file to improve readability and maintainability. This applies to other functions in this file as well. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
4. src/altimate.ts:598
- Draft comment:
Please use semantic versioning (semver) for version comparisons instead of direct array index comparisons. This applies to other similar instances in this file as well. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_faCqFnDgapwAd867
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
package.json
Outdated
| @@ -1202,7 +1205,11 @@ | |||
| "deploy-openvsx": "ovsx publish", | |||
| "panel:webviews": "npm run build --prefix ./webview_panels", | |||
| "panel:lineage": "npm run build --prefix ./new_lineage_panel", | |||
| "install:panels": "npm install --prefix ./new_lineage_panel && npm install --prefix ./webview_panels" | |||
| "install:panels": "npm install --prefix ./new_lineage_panel && npm install --prefix ./webview_panels", | |||
| "test": "node ./out/test/runTest.js", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The test and test:unit scripts are both running the same file (./out/test/runTest.js). Consider differentiating them if they are meant to run different tests or remove one if redundant.
src/utils.ts
Outdated
| timeout = setTimeout(fn, wait); | ||
| let timeout: NodeJS.Timeout | null = null; | ||
|
|
||
| export function debounce(fn: (...args: any[]) => void, wait: number) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The debounce function uses a single timeout variable for all instances, which can cause issues if multiple debounced functions are used simultaneously. Consider using a closure to maintain separate timeouts for each function instance.
src/utils.ts
Outdated
| timeout = setTimeout(fn, wait); | ||
| let timeout: NodeJS.Timeout | null = null; | ||
|
|
||
| export function debounce(fn: (...args: any[]) => void, wait: number) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please provide an explicit return type for the debounce function to improve readability and maintainability.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (15)
src/altimate.ts (1)
690-708: Consider streaming directly to the file to reduce memory usage.
Usingresponse.arrayBuffer()for large files can be memory-intensive. A streaming approach avoids potential out-of-memory scenarios.--- a/src/altimate.ts +++ b/src/altimate.ts @@ -690,19 +690,9 @@ const response = await fetch(artifactUrl); if (!response.ok) { throw new Error(`Failed to download file: ${response.statusText}`); } const fileStream = createWriteStream(destinationPath); - const buffer = await response.arrayBuffer(); - const uint8Array = new Uint8Array(buffer); - - await new Promise<void>((resolve, reject) => { - fileStream.write(uint8Array, (error) => { - if (error) { - reject(error); - } else { - fileStream.end(); - resolve(); - } - }); + // Stream the response directly + await new Promise<void>((resolve, reject) => { + response.body?.pipe(fileStream).on("finish", resolve).on("error", reject); }); this.dbtTerminal.debug("File downloaded successfully!", fileName); return tempFolder;src/manifest/sourceFileWatchersFactory.ts (2)
8-14: Skeleton factory method.
Thecreate()method returns a simpleDisposableobject. It might be beneficial to add debug logs or validations once watchers are implemented.
15-20: Establish watchers or remove placeholder.
createSourceFileWatchers()currently returns an empty object. Consider implementing real file watchers (e.g.,workspace.createFileSystemWatcher) to handle source file changes or remove the placeholder if not needed yet.src/lib/dependencies.ts (7)
2-4: Consider using a type alias or adding properties to this interface.The interface
AltimateRequestis empty, which triggers static analysis warnings. In TypeScript, an interface that has no properties is effectively the same as{}, making it somewhat redundant. If you plan to add properties later, you can suppress the warning temporarily. Otherwise, consider turning it into a type alias or adding properties to avoid confusion.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 2-4: An empty interface is equivalent to {}.
Safe fix: Use a type alias instead.
(lint/suspicious/noEmptyInterface)
6-8: Consider using a type alias or adding properties to this interface.Same reasoning as above for
CommandProcessExecutionFactory. If more fields are expected in future commits, documenting intended usage may help clarify its purpose.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 6-8: An empty interface is equivalent to {}.
Safe fix: Use a type alias instead.
(lint/suspicious/noEmptyInterface)
10-12: Consider using a type alias or adding properties to this interface.
DBTCommandExecutionInfrastructureis currently empty. Unless you intend to use it as a placeholder to be expanded soon, a type alias would be more appropriate.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 10-12: An empty interface is equivalent to {}.
Safe fix: Use a type alias instead.
(lint/suspicious/noEmptyInterface)
14-16: Consider using a type alias or adding properties to this interface.
DBTProjectis empty for the time being. If you plan to define project-specific properties, you can keep it. Otherwise, a type alias might suffice.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 14-16: An empty interface is equivalent to {}.
Safe fix: Use a type alias instead.
(lint/suspicious/noEmptyInterface)
25-27: Consider using a type alias or adding properties to this interface.
PythonEnvironmentis empty. If you anticipate adding environment attributes (likepythonPathorversion), keep it as is. Otherwise, a type alias might be clearer.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 25-27: An empty interface is equivalent to {}.
Safe fix: Use a type alias instead.
(lint/suspicious/noEmptyInterface)
29-31: Consider using a type alias or adding properties to this interface.
QueryManifestServiceis empty, similar to the others. If you plan to add properties soon, leave the interface. Otherwise, a type alias would suffice to avoid no-op interfaces.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 29-31: An empty interface is equivalent to {}.
Safe fix: Use a type alias instead.
(lint/suspicious/noEmptyInterface)
33-35: Consider using a type alias or adding properties to this interface.
TelemetryServiceis also empty and triggers the same static analysis warning. If you need a placeholder, make that explicit with a comment, or transform it into a type alias.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 33-35: An empty interface is equivalent to {}.
Safe fix: Use a type alias instead.
(lint/suspicious/noEmptyInterface)
src/test/suite/testParser.test.ts (1)
12-44: Ensure future maintainability of the large mock object.The
mockTerminalis heavily populated with stub methods. As more logging functionalities or telemetry features are added, maintaining this mock may become cumbersome. Consider extracting reusable mock logic or using a library likesinonto automate partial stubbing.src/test/suite/dbtProject.test.ts (2)
70-90: Consider adopting libraries like Sinon or Jest for mocks and stubs.
Manually creating large mock objects can be cumbersome to maintain. Using established mocking frameworks can make the mock generation more concise and robust.
91-137: Encapsulate complex setup into helper functions.
The test setup block is quite large and initializing many mock dependencies. Refactoring repeated logic into reusable helper functions can boost readability and maintainability.tsconfig.json (1)
9-16: Validate new compiler options' impact on build times and error checking.
Options likeskipLibCheck,resolveJsonModule, andallowJscan affect performance and error detection. Verify that these are in line with your project’s requirements..github/workflows/tests.yml (1)
43-43: Add a newline at the end of the file and remove trailing spaces.
YAML linting requires a newline at the end of the file and no trailing whitespace.+🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 43-43: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 43-43: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
.github/workflows/tests.yml(1 hunks)package.json(3 hunks)src/altimate.ts(4 hunks)src/document_formatting_edit_provider/dbtDocumentFormattingEditProvider.ts(4 hunks)src/lib/dependencies.ts(1 hunks)src/manifest/sourceFileWatchersFactory.ts(1 hunks)src/test/runTest.ts(1 hunks)src/test/suite/dbtProject.test.ts(1 hunks)src/test/suite/extension.test.ts(1 hunks)src/test/suite/index.ts(1 hunks)src/test/suite/runTest.ts(1 hunks)src/test/suite/testParser.test.ts(1 hunks)src/utils.ts(1 hunks)test-workspace/dbt_project.yml(1 hunks)tsconfig.json(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/tests.yml
17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
40-40: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/tests.yml
[error] 43-43: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 43-43: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
test-workspace/dbt_project.yml
[warning] 20-20: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[warning] 21-21: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[error] 21-21: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 21-21: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/lib/dependencies.ts
[error] 2-4: An empty interface is equivalent to {}.
Safe fix: Use a type alias instead.
(lint/suspicious/noEmptyInterface)
[error] 6-8: An empty interface is equivalent to {}.
Safe fix: Use a type alias instead.
(lint/suspicious/noEmptyInterface)
[error] 10-12: An empty interface is equivalent to {}.
Safe fix: Use a type alias instead.
(lint/suspicious/noEmptyInterface)
[error] 14-16: An empty interface is equivalent to {}.
Safe fix: Use a type alias instead.
(lint/suspicious/noEmptyInterface)
[error] 25-27: An empty interface is equivalent to {}.
Safe fix: Use a type alias instead.
(lint/suspicious/noEmptyInterface)
[error] 29-31: An empty interface is equivalent to {}.
Safe fix: Use a type alias instead.
(lint/suspicious/noEmptyInterface)
[error] 33-35: An empty interface is equivalent to {}.
Safe fix: Use a type alias instead.
(lint/suspicious/noEmptyInterface)
🔇 Additional comments (29)
src/document_formatting_edit_provider/dbtDocumentFormattingEditProvider.ts (5)
1-9: Ensure dependency availability for new imports.
The additional import statements for"which"and the specific types from"parse-diff"enhance type checking and clarity. Just verify that"which"is listed as a dependency in your package.json and confirm no duplication of imports.
19-20: Check for potential redundancy in VSCode imports.
Imports forRangeandPositionare standard. These appear necessary, so no issue here.
137-164: Confirm valid line references on insert/replace/delete operations.
When dealing with properties likechange.lnorchange.ln1, verify they always point to valid document lines. If these are out of range, you might see runtime errors.
175-184: Good usage of type-guard methods.
Each helper method precisely narrows down the union type fromparse-diff. This neatens logic checks in the main loop.
116-130: Validate chunk boundaries to avoid off-by-one errors.
When referencinglastChunk.oldStart + lastChunk.oldLinesand comparing tochunk.oldStart, ensure that you never have negative or out-of-range indices (particularly whenoldLinesis zero). Large or malformed diffs could cause indexes to be out of bounds.src/altimate.ts (3)
422-423: Dynamic import approach for node-fetch is valid.
This pattern keepsnode-fetchfrom being eagerly required. The try/catch blocks already handle potential import failures, so this looks good.
524-525: Consistency in dynamic import for uploadToS3.
Reusing the same dynamic import approach ensures consistent loading fornode-fetch. Just confirm there is no duplication of logic that can be factored out.
601-602: Uniform dynamic import in fetch method.
The same lazy import strategy is applied here, aligning with the rest of the file. This is consistent.src/manifest/sourceFileWatchersFactory.ts (1)
1-6: Initial interface creation is straightforward.
SourceFileWatchersextendsDisposableand correctly includesdispose(). No issues here.src/test/suite/runTest.ts (1)
1-22: Clear and minimal test runner script.
The script properly sets up the extension paths and runs tests. The error handling is concise and standard.src/test/runTest.ts (1)
1-26: Well-structured approach to run tests.
Specifying a custom workspace and including extension flags ensures stable test conditions. Looks good.src/lib/dependencies.ts (1)
18-23: Interface with well-defined methods is good.
DBTTerminalprovides clearly typed method signatures for logging. The spread operator arguments are typed asany[]; consider specifying narrower types if you know the expected parameter structures. This approach improves type-safety and encourages consistent usage throughout the codebase.src/test/suite/index.ts (1)
6-39: Overall test runner structure looks good.The new
runfunction leverages Mocha’s TDD UI, sets a helpful timeout, and handles promise-based flow for both test discovery and execution. The usage ofglobis straightforward, and errors are properly passed toreject. This is a solid foundation for automated tests.src/test/suite/testParser.test.ts (3)
45-50: Interface usage clarity.The mock
DBTProjectis a good example of how TypeScript interfaces can guide the shape of objects. If you add fields toDBTProjectin the future, be sure to update this mock accordingly to keep the tests representative.
52-55: Test coverage for null/undefined inputs is excellent.Validating an empty array input ensures that
createTestMetaMaphandles edge cases gracefully. This is a good practice for robust test coverage.
57-88: Good practice on verifying property parsing.The second test thoroughly checks multiple fields (e.g.,
column_name,test_metadata, etc.). Ensuring each relevant field is asserted helps detect regressions in your parser logic.src/test/suite/extension.test.ts (4)
95-101: Meaningful presence check.Confirming the extension object exists is crucial. If planning to rely on environment-specific extension availability, clarify fallback logic or environment disclaimers, especially for CI environments.
103-110: Cleanly testing the extension activation.The test ensures the extension transitions from inactive to active state. This verifies that your extension initialization logic is triggered properly. Good job ensuring robust coverage of extension lifecycle events.
112-142: Comprehensive command registration checks.By stubbing
vscode.commands.getCommandsand verifying the presence ofdbt.runanddbt.compile, these tests confirm your extension’s commands are exposed as expected. The approach is straightforward, easy to maintain, and ensures reliable coverage.
20-93: Intuitive mocking approach for VS Code extension APIs.Creating mock extensions for both
jinjahtmlandinnoverio.vscode-dbt-power-useringetExtension()is an elegant way to test extension presence and activation states. The stubs for thevscode.extensionsAPI are concise and easy to follow. However, verify that the mock environment remains in sync with real extension IDs if they change in the future.To confirm that these mocks match actual extension IDs in your workspace, you can run:
✅ Verification successful
The previous search might have been too specific. Let's look for these extension IDs across the codebase and check package.json files to verify the extension information.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
Extension IDs in mocks match actual implementation
The mock extension IDs used in the test file (
src/test/suite/extension.test.ts) are consistent with the actual extension configuration:
samuelcolvin.jinjahtmlis correctly referenced as a dependency inpackage.jsonunderextensionDependenciesinnoverio.vscode-dbt-power-usermatches the extension's own package name and publisher ID as defined in the rootpackage.jsonThe extension IDs are also consistently used across the codebase:
- In test setup (
src/test/runTest.ts)- In actual extension code (
src/commands/index.ts)🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify extension references # We'll search for any references to vscode.extensions.getExtension in the codebase to confirm rg 'vscode\.extensions\.getExtension'Length of output: 39
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a broader search for extension IDs rg -i "samuelcolvin\.jinjahtml|innoverio\.vscode-dbt-power-user" --type ts # Also search for package.json to verify extension details fd "package.json" --type f --exec cat {}Length of output: 48354
src/test/suite/dbtProject.test.ts (2)
39-55: Avoid introducing large mock interfaces without tests that cover their usage.
While these mock interfaces appear comprehensive, ensure they are sufficiently tested or that existing tests cover all interface functionalities to prevent regressions.
404-426: Expand test coverage to include negative or error scenarios.
The tests verify initialization properties and Jinja syntax detection in normal conditions. Consider adding tests to handle malformed data, exceptions, or undefined states for better coverage.tsconfig.json (2)
4-6: Confirm compatibility of ES2020 target and lib with the extension runtime.
Ensure that targeting ES2020 is compatible with the lowest-supported VSCode version or Node.js environment your extension expects.
29-32: Check if newly excluded folders are meant to be excluded from all builds.
Excluding folders likewebview_panels,dist, andoutis common for production builds, but confirm that it does not break developer workflows that might rely on partial build artifacts..github/workflows/tests.yml (1)
17-20: Update Actions versions to ensure compatibility with newer GitHub runners.
Static analysis flags these steps as using older runner versions. Confirm that upgrading to the latest versions ofactions/checkout,actions/setup-node, andactions/upload-artifactaligns with your constraints.Also applies to: 40-40
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
package.json (2)
1246-1250: LGTM! Testing dependencies are well-chosen.The combination of Chai (assertions), Sinon (mocks/stubs), and ts-node (TypeScript execution) provides a robust testing foundation.
20-22: Verify the need for extensionsAny API proposal.The addition of
"extensionsAny"toenabledApiProposalssuggests usage of experimental VS Code APIs. This could lead to breaking changes in future VS Code versions.Run this script to check where this API is being used:
✅ Verification successful
The
extensionsAnyAPI proposal is required for the extension's functionalityThe codebase shows legitimate usage of VS Code's extension API in several places:
- Interacting with the Python extension (
ms-python.python) insrc/manifest/pythonEnvironment.ts- Checking for the dbt Power User extension in
src/commands/index.ts- Using
extensions.allin test mocks (src/test/suite/extension.test.ts)The
extensionsAnyAPI proposal is necessary as the extension needs to:
- Access other installed extensions via
extensions.getExtension()- Use
extensions.allfor testing purposes🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of experimental APIs rg -l "vscode\.extensions\.all"Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try different search patterns to find any usage of VS Code extension APIs # Search for extensions-related imports and usage rg -i "extensions" --type ts # Also search for potential usage of the API in different forms rg -i "getExtension|getAllExtensions" --type tsLength of output: 1695
test-workspace/dbt_project.yml (2)
1-5: LGTM! Project metadata is well-structured.The configuration follows dbt best practices with clear project name, version, and config-version specifications.
7-12: Test infrastructure paths are properly configured.The test-related paths follow dbt conventions:
test-paths: ["tests"]for test filesmacro-paths: ["macros"]for test utilities
package.json
Outdated
| "install:panels": "npm install --prefix ./new_lineage_panel && npm install --prefix ./webview_panels", | ||
| "test": "node ./out/test/runTest.js", | ||
| "test:unit": "node ./out/test/runTest.js", | ||
| "pretest:unit": "npm run compile", | ||
| "compile": "tsc -p ./" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Test script configuration looks incomplete.
While the basic test infrastructure is set up, there are some improvements needed:
- The test script and test:unit script are identical, suggesting one might need different configuration
- No coverage reporting is configured
- No test environment setup script is present
Consider adding these configurations:
"scripts": {
"test": "node ./out/test/runTest.js",
- "test:unit": "node ./out/test/runTest.js",
+ "test:unit": "node ./out/test/runTest.js --unittest",
+ "test:coverage": "nyc npm run test:unit",
+ "pretest": "npm run clean && npm run compile",
"pretest:unit": "npm run compile",
+ "clean": "rimraf out",
"compile": "tsc -p ./"
}Also add these devDependencies:
"devDependencies": {
+ "nyc": "^15.1.0",
+ "rimraf": "^5.0.0"
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
test-workspace/dbt_project.yml
Outdated
| target-path: "target" | ||
| clean-targets: | ||
| - "target" | ||
| - "dbt_packages" | ||
|
|
||
| models: | ||
| test_project: | ||
| +materialized: table |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix YAML formatting issues.
The YAML has formatting issues flagged by static analysis:
- Incorrect indentation levels
- Missing newline at end of file
- Trailing spaces
Apply these fixes:
target-path: "target"
clean-targets:
- - "target"
- - "dbt_packages"
+ - "target"
+ - "dbt_packages"
models:
- test_project:
- +materialized: table
+ test_project:
+ +materialized: table
+📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| target-path: "target" | |
| clean-targets: | |
| - "target" | |
| - "dbt_packages" | |
| models: | |
| test_project: | |
| +materialized: table | |
| target-path: "target" | |
| clean-targets: | |
| - "target" | |
| - "dbt_packages" | |
| models: | |
| test_project: | |
| +materialized: table | |
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[warning] 20-20: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[warning] 21-21: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[error] 21-21: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 21-21: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 35819c4 in 19 seconds
More details
- Looked at
16lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/tests.yml:5
- Draft comment:
The workflow is set to trigger on the 'master' branch. Ensure this is intentional, as many repositories use 'main' as the default branch name. If 'main' is the intended branch, update the branch name accordingly. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful.
2. .github/workflows/tests.yml:5
- Draft comment:
Avoid abbreviating terms in labels. Use 'main' instead of 'master' for clarity. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
Workflow ID: wflow_k7jgVAmJMVYlfoFi
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (9)
.github/workflows/tests.yml (1)
43-43: Add a newline at the end of the file and remove trailing spaces.
This helps maintain consistent file formatting and satisfies YAML best practices.name: Tests ... path: test-results/ +🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 43-43: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 43-43: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
src/test/suite/testParser.test.ts (4)
13-51: Enhance test setup with spies for better verification.Consider using Sinon spies for the mock terminal methods to verify if and how they are called during tests.
setup(() => { // Create a proper mock of DBTTerminal with all required methods mockTerminal = { - debug: () => {}, - log: () => {}, - error: () => {}, - warn: () => {}, + debug: sandbox.spy(), + log: sandbox.spy(), + error: sandbox.spy(), + warn: sandbox.spy(), // ... other methods } as unknown as DBTTerminal; mockProject = { projectRoot: { fsPath: "/mock/project/path" }, getProjectName: () => "mock_project", + // Add more mock methods that might be needed by tests + getTarget: () => "dev", + getProfile: () => "default", } as DBTProject; });
53-56: Add more edge cases to the empty testsMap test.Consider testing with
null,undefined, and invalid test maps to ensure robust error handling.test("createTestMetaMap should handle null/undefined testsMap", async () => { const result = await testParser.createTestMetaMap([], mockProject); assert.strictEqual(result.size, 0); + + // Test with null + const nullResult = await testParser.createTestMetaMap(null as any, mockProject); + assert.strictEqual(nullResult.size, 0); + + // Test with undefined + const undefinedResult = await testParser.createTestMetaMap(undefined as any, mockProject); + assert.strictEqual(undefinedResult.size, 0); + + // Test with invalid test map + const invalidResult = await testParser.createTestMetaMap([{ invalid: 'data' }], mockProject); + assert.strictEqual(invalidResult.size, 0); });
58-96: Extract test data to constants for reusability.The mock test data could be moved to constants or factory functions to improve maintainability and reusability across tests.
+const createBasicTestMap = (overrides = {}) => [{ + name: "test_1", + resource_type: "test", + raw_sql: "SELECT * FROM table", + original_file_path: "tests/test_1.sql", + database: "test_db", + schema: "test_schema", + alias: "test_alias", + column_name: '"Test Column"', + test_metadata: { + name: "not_null", + kwargs: { column_name: "test_column" }, + }, + attached_node: "model.test_model", + depends_on: { + macros: ["macro1"], + nodes: ["model.test_model"], + sources: [], + }, + unique_id: "test.test_1", + ...overrides +}]; test("createTestMetaMap should parse test metadata correctly", async () => { - const mockTestsMap = [/* ... */]; + const mockTestsMap = createBasicTestMap(); const result = await testParser.createTestMetaMap(mockTestsMap, mockProject); // ... rest of the test });
98-132: Add assertions for error cases in column-level tests.The test should verify behavior when column metadata is missing or malformed.
test("should handle column-level tests correctly", async () => { const mockTestsMap = [/* ... */]; const result = await testParser.createTestMetaMap(mockTestsMap, mockProject); const testMeta = result.get("not_null_column_test"); assert.ok(testMeta); assert.strictEqual(testMeta.column_name, "test_column"); assert.ok(testMeta.test_metadata); assert.strictEqual(testMeta.test_metadata.name, "not_null"); + + // Test with missing column_name + const missingColumnMap = [{ + ...mockTestsMap[0], + column_name: undefined, + }]; + const missingColumnResult = await testParser.createTestMetaMap(missingColumnMap, mockProject); + const missingColumnMeta = missingColumnResult.get("not_null_column_test"); + assert.strictEqual(missingColumnMeta.column_name, undefined); + + // Test with malformed test_metadata + const malformedMap = [{ + ...mockTestsMap[0], + test_metadata: { name: "not_null" }, // missing kwargs + }]; + const malformedResult = await testParser.createTestMetaMap(malformedMap, mockProject); + const malformedMeta = malformedResult.get("not_null_column_test"); + assert.ok(malformedMeta.test_metadata); + assert.deepStrictEqual(malformedMeta.test_metadata.kwargs, {}); });src/test/suite/dbtProject.test.ts (4)
41-91: Move mock interfaces to a separate file.Consider extracting these mock interfaces to a separate file (e.g.,
src/test/mocks/interfaces.ts) to improve maintainability and reusability across test files.
103-440: Split setup function into smaller, focused functions.The setup function is quite long and handles multiple concerns. Consider breaking it down into smaller functions for better maintainability.
+const createMockOutputChannel = (): LogOutputChannel => ({ + name: "dbt", + append: () => {}, + // ... other methods +}); + +const createMockTerminal = (mockTelemetry: any, mockOutputChannel: LogOutputChannel) => ({ + debug: () => {}, + // ... other methods +}); + +const createMockCommandProcessExecution = (mockTerminal: DBTTerminal) => ({ + complete: async () => ({ stdout: "", stderr: "", fullOutput: "" }), + // ... other methods +}); setup(() => { sandbox = sinon.createSandbox(); telemetrySpy = sandbox.spy((eventName: string) => {}); altimateHandleSpy = sandbox.spy(() => {}); - const mockOutputChannel: LogOutputChannel = { - name: "dbt", - // ... many lines of implementation - }; + const mockOutputChannel = createMockOutputChannel(); + const mockTerminal = createMockTerminal(mockTelemetry, mockOutputChannel); + const mockCommandProcessExecution = createMockCommandProcessExecution(mockTerminal); // ... rest of setup });
458-461: Improve test descriptions and assertions for initialization tests.The test descriptions could be more specific, and the assertions could be more comprehensive.
-test("should initialize with correct default values", () => { +test("should initialize DBTProject with correct thread count and quiet mode settings", () => { assert.strictEqual((mockProject as any).args.threads, 1); assert.strictEqual((mockProject as any).args.quiet, true); + assert.ok((mockProject as any).args, "args object should exist"); + assert.deepStrictEqual(Object.keys((mockProject as any).args).sort(), ["quiet", "target_path", "threads"].sort(), "args should have expected properties"); }); -test("should handle target path correctly", () => { +test("should initialize DBTProject with correct target path setting", () => { assert.strictEqual((mockProject as any).args.target_path, "/custom/path"); + assert.ok(typeof (mockProject as any).args.target_path === "string", "target_path should be a string"); });Also applies to: 463-465
474-482: Enhance model test execution test with more assertions.The test could verify more aspects of the test execution.
test("should handle model test execution correctly", async () => { const modelName = "test_model"; + const expectedOutput = { stdout: "test output", stderr: "", fullOutput: "test output" }; mockDbtProjectIntegration.runModelTest = async () => { - return { stdout: "", stderr: "", fullOutput: "" }; + return expectedOutput; }; - await mockProject.runModelTest(modelName); + const result = await mockProject.runModelTest(modelName); sinon.assert.calledWith(telemetrySpy, "runModelTest"); + assert.deepStrictEqual(result, expectedOutput, "should return expected output"); + assert.ok(telemetrySpy.calledOnce, "telemetry should be called exactly once"); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
.github/workflows/tests.yml(1 hunks)src/errors/noCredentialsError.ts(1 hunks)src/exceptions/noCredentialsError.ts(1 hunks)src/manifest/dbtProject.ts(2 hunks)src/test/suite/dbtProject.test.ts(1 hunks)src/test/suite/testParser.test.ts(1 hunks)test-workspace/tests/integration/test_integration.py(1 hunks)test-workspace/tests/unit/test_core.py(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- test-workspace/tests/unit/test_core.py
- test-workspace/tests/integration/test_integration.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/tests.yml
17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
40-40: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/tests.yml
[error] 43-43: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 43-43: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/exceptions/noCredentialsError.ts (1)
1-6: Consider avoiding duplicated error classes.
You also have a file undersrc/errors/noCredentialsError.tsthat provides the same functionality. Verify if both files are truly needed or consolidate them into a single file to reduce confusion.src/errors/noCredentialsError.ts (1)
1-6: Implementation looks solid.
This custom error class is straightforward and follows good practices by setting anameproperty.src/manifest/dbtProject.ts (2)
575-575: Good use of "await".
AwaitingrunModelTestensures asynchronous operations complete correctly.
598-612: Robust error handling ingenerateDocsImmediatelymethod.
This try-catch block properly callshandleNoCredentialsError. Confirm that other possible errors are also adequately handled or logged..github/workflows/tests.yml (1)
17-17: Validate action versions.
According to the static analysis hints, these actions (actions/checkout@v3,actions/setup-node@v3, andactions/upload-artifact@v3) might not be up to date. Confirm whether a newer major version is recommended.Also applies to: 20-20, 40-40
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 868aee1 in 39 seconds
More details
- Looked at
230lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. src/test/suite/dbtProjectContainer.test.ts:1
- Draft comment:
The import ofassertis unnecessary aschaiis used for assertions. Consider removing it to clean up the code.
- Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The test file imports both 'assert' and 'chai' for assertions, which is redundant. Since 'chai' is used throughout the tests, 'assert' is unnecessary and should be removed.
2. src/test/suite/dbtProjectContainer.test.ts:14
- Draft comment:
Avoid abbreviations in test suite titles for clarity. Consider using 'Data Build Tool' instead of 'DBT'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
While the rule about avoiding abbreviations is valid, DBT appears to be the canonical name used throughout the codebase. The class being tested is literally named DBTProjectContainer. Changing just the test suite title to use the full name would actually reduce consistency and clarity. The abbreviation is also well-known in the context of this project.
The rule about avoiding abbreviations is explicitly listed in the additional rules. Maybe we should be strict about following it regardless of context?
In this case, enforcing the rule would reduce clarity rather than improve it. DBT is used as a proper noun throughout the codebase, including in the actual class name being tested.
The comment should be deleted. Using DBT is more appropriate here as it matches the actual class name and maintains consistency with the codebase.
Workflow ID: wflow_a4InAc7wXTG29RGz
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/test/suite/dbtProjectContainer.test.ts (3)
1-4: Consider standardizing on a single assertion library.
Currently, both Node’s built-inassertand Chai’sexpectare imported. In many projects, sticking to a single assertion style promotes consistency.
68-71: Consider an additional test for empty or null adapters.
It might be helpful to verify thatgetAdaptersgracefully handles scenarios where no adapters are returned, or if an unexpected input occurs.
208-224: Consider negative or error handling tests.
While you handle an empty workspace scenario well, you may also want to cover cases where the workspace folders have invalid URIs or fail to initialize properly.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/test/suite/dbtProjectContainer.test.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/test/suite/dbtProjectContainer.test.ts (3)
14-24: Good setup for the sandbox and stubbing.
This structure helps isolate each test and ensures clean resets without side effects.
139-167: Verify concurrent event emissions.
Multiple ongoing or simultaneous calls todetectDBTmight trigger the emitter in quick succession. Consider adding concurrency or edge case tests if you anticipate parallel calls.
169-207: Excellent coverage for the workspace folder initialization.
These tests confirm that workspace folders are registered correctly and that events are fired, which covers an important aspect of the extension’s bootstrapping logic.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 977ccc6 in 33 seconds
More details
- Looked at
21lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. src/manifest/dbtProject.ts:609
- Draft comment:
Consider adding error handling for whenstderris not empty, as this indicates an error occurred during command execution. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a valid diff hunk.
2. src/manifest/dbtProject.ts:597
- Draft comment:
Please specify a return type for thegenerateDocsImmediatelyfunction to improve code readability and maintainability. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_NfEgVHAtWeJvZnnl
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
…thods and fixing NoCredentialsError test
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 48cf4a3 in 1 minute and 8 seconds
More details
- Looked at
1129lines of code in6files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. src/test/suite/dbtProject.test.ts:365
- Draft comment:
Add an assertion to verify thatmockAltimate.handlePreviewFeaturesis called whenNoCredentialsErroris thrown. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
Workflow ID: wflow_W29JwDtJjP2bKCA0
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/test/suite/dbtCoreIntegration.test.ts (1)
76-101: Consider adding coverage for edge cases.
The test checks a standard valid SQL query, which is great. However, you might also want to include scenarios like empty queries, queries referencing non-existent tables, or a broad range of dialects if your code supports them.src/test/suite/dbtProject.test.ts (2)
36-292: Consider extracting mock creation into factory functions.The setup function is quite long and could be more maintainable if mock creation was extracted into separate factory functions. This would improve readability and make it easier to maintain the test suite.
Example refactor:
+ function createMockPythonEnvironment() { + return { + pythonPath: "/path/to/python", + environmentVariables: {}, + onPythonEnvironmentChanged: () => ({ + dispose: () => {}, + }), + }; + } + function createMockTerminal() { + return { + debug: () => {}, + error: () => {}, + warn: () => {}, + log: () => {}, + show: () => {}, + }; + } setup(() => { sandbox = sinon.createSandbox(); - mockPythonEnvironment = { - pythonPath: "/path/to/python", - environmentVariables: {}, - onPythonEnvironmentChanged: () => ({ - dispose: () => {}, - }), - }; + mockPythonEnvironment = createMockPythonEnvironment(); - mockTerminal = { - debug: () => {}, - error: () => {}, - warn: () => {}, - log: () => {}, - show: () => {}, - }; + mockTerminal = createMockTerminal();
298-386: Consider adding test cases for edge cases and error scenarios.While the test suite has good coverage of the happy path, consider adding test cases for:
- Error scenarios in model compilation
- Edge cases in Jinja syntax detection (e.g., malformed Jinja)
- Boundary conditions in target path handling
- Network failures in command execution
Example test cases to add:
test("should handle malformed jinja syntax correctly", () => { expect((mockProject as any).has_jinja("{{ unclosed")).to.be.true; expect((mockProject as any).has_jinja("{% unclosed")).to.be.true; }); test("should handle network failures in command execution", async () => { // Mock network failure const mockDbtProjectIntegration = { executeCommandImmediately: async () => { throw new Error("Network failure"); } }; // Test error handling });src/manifest/dbtProject.ts (1)
575-586: Consider adding retry logic for transient failures.The
runModelTestmethod has good error handling but could benefit from retry logic for transient failures. Also, consider logging the error before returning the empty result.Example implementation:
async runModelTest(modelName: string) { try { const testModelCommand = this.dbtCommandFactory.createTestModelCommand(modelName); const result = await this.dbtProjectIntegration.runModelTest(testModelCommand); const returnValue = { stdout: result.stdout, stderr: result.stderr, fullOutput: result.fullOutput, }; await this.telemetry.sendTelemetryEvent("runModelTest"); return returnValue; } catch (error) { + this.terminal.error( + "runModelTest", + `Error running model test for ${modelName}`, + error, + true + ); this.handleNoCredentialsError(error); return { stdout: "", stderr: "", fullOutput: "" }; } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
src/dbt_client/dbtCloudIntegration.ts(1 hunks)src/dbt_client/dbtCoreIntegration.ts(1 hunks)src/dbt_client/dbtIntegration.ts(1 hunks)src/manifest/dbtProject.ts(2 hunks)src/test/suite/dbtCoreIntegration.test.ts(1 hunks)src/test/suite/dbtProject.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/test/suite/dbtProject.test.ts
[error] 396-398: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/test/suite/dbtCoreIntegration.test.ts (2)
24-30: Great use of Sinon sandbox for test isolation.
By creating a sandbox in thesetup()phase and restoring it in theteardown()phase, you're preventing potential side effects and ensuring each test remains independent.
102-129: Comprehensive handling of invalid SQL.
This test covers syntax errors effectively. As an extra measure, consider verifying that thevalidateSqlmethod gracefully handles other error categories (e.g., referencing invalid columns).src/dbt_client/dbtIntegration.ts (1)
351-353: Return type clarity.
Exposingstdout,stderr, andfullOutputinrunModelTestis beneficial for debugging. Consider describing each field’s purpose in comments or in your documentation to provide clarity for future maintainers.src/dbt_client/dbtCoreIntegration.ts (1)
668-677: Good enhancement for capturing test outputs.
Returning standard output and error details can streamline debugging test failures. Consider logging or storing these somewhere if longer-term traceability is required.src/dbt_client/dbtCloudIntegration.ts (1)
540-549: Consistent approach withrunModelTest.
Maintaining the same interface for capturing stdout/stderr output across different integrations promotes consistency. Ensure the calling code checks for non-emptystderrif further error handling is needed.
src/test/suite/dbtProject.test.ts
Outdated
| class MockValidationProvider extends ValidationProvider { | ||
| constructor(altimate: any) { | ||
| super(altimate); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| validateCredentialsSilently(): void {} | ||
|
|
||
| validateCredentials(): void {} | ||
|
|
||
| isAuthenticated(): boolean { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| throwIfNotAuthenticated(): void {} | ||
|
|
||
| setDBTContext(): void {} | ||
|
|
||
| dispose(): void {} | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unnecessary constructor and enhance mock implementations.
The MockValidationProvider class has an unnecessary constructor that only calls super. Additionally, the mock implementations could be more comprehensive.
Apply this diff to improve the mock implementations:
-class MockValidationProvider extends ValidationProvider {
- constructor(altimate: any) {
- super(altimate);
- }
+class MockValidationProvider extends ValidationProvider {
+ private _isAuthenticated = true;
+ private _dbtContext: any = {};
validateCredentialsSilently(): void {}
validateCredentials(): void {}
isAuthenticated(): boolean {
- return true;
+ return this._isAuthenticated;
}
throwIfNotAuthenticated(): void {
+ if (!this._isAuthenticated) {
+ throw new Error("Not authenticated");
+ }
}
setDBTContext(): void {
+ this._dbtContext = {};
}
dispose(): void {}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| class MockValidationProvider extends ValidationProvider { | |
| constructor(altimate: any) { | |
| super(altimate); | |
| } | |
| validateCredentialsSilently(): void {} | |
| validateCredentials(): void {} | |
| isAuthenticated(): boolean { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| throwIfNotAuthenticated(): void {} | |
| setDBTContext(): void {} | |
| dispose(): void {} | |
| } | |
| class MockValidationProvider extends ValidationProvider { | |
| private _isAuthenticated = true; | |
| private _dbtContext: any = {}; | |
| validateCredentialsSilently(): void {} | |
| validateCredentials(): void {} | |
| isAuthenticated(): boolean { | |
| return this._isAuthenticated; | |
| } | |
| throwIfNotAuthenticated(): void { | |
| if (!this._isAuthenticated) { | |
| throw new Error("Not authenticated"); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| setDBTContext(): void { | |
| this._dbtContext = {}; | |
| } | |
| dispose(): void {} | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 396-398: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
src/manifest/dbtProject.ts
Outdated
| try { | ||
| const docsGenerateCommand = | ||
| this.dbtCommandFactory.createDocsGenerateCommand(); | ||
| args?.forEach((arg) => docsGenerateCommand.addArgument(arg)); | ||
| docsGenerateCommand.focus = false; | ||
| docsGenerateCommand.logToTerminal = false; | ||
| this.telemetry.sendTelemetryEvent("executeCommandImmediately"); | ||
| const { stdout, stderr } = | ||
| await this.dbtProjectIntegration.executeCommandImmediately( | ||
| docsGenerateCommand, | ||
| ); | ||
| if (stderr) { | ||
| throw new Error(stderr); | ||
| } | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| this.handleNoCredentialsError(error); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling in generateDocsImmediately.
The error handling in generateDocsImmediately could be improved by:
- Adding specific error types
- Including telemetry for errors
- Providing more context in error messages
Example implementation:
async generateDocsImmediately(args?: string[]) {
try {
const docsGenerateCommand =
this.dbtCommandFactory.createDocsGenerateCommand();
args?.forEach((arg) => docsGenerateCommand.addArgument(arg));
docsGenerateCommand.focus = false;
docsGenerateCommand.logToTerminal = false;
this.telemetry.sendTelemetryEvent("executeCommandImmediately");
const { stdout, stderr } =
await this.dbtProjectIntegration.executeCommandImmediately(
docsGenerateCommand,
);
if (stderr) {
- throw new Error(stderr);
+ throw new Error(`Documentation generation failed: ${stderr}`);
}
} catch (error) {
+ this.telemetry.sendTelemetryError(
+ "generateDocsError",
+ error,
+ { command: "generateDocs" }
+ );
this.handleNoCredentialsError(error);
}
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on b43eded in 30 seconds
More details
- Looked at
26lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/tests.yml:49
- Draft comment:
Ensure the 'test-results/' directory is created before uploading artifacts to avoid errors. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful.
2. .github/workflows/tests.yml:30
- Draft comment:
Avoid abbreviating terms in titles or labels. Use 'environment variables' instead of 'env vars'. This applies to any other instances where abbreviations are used in titles or labels. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a valid diff hunk.
Workflow ID: wflow_JYkFhyoNL3MuZ65c
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/tests.yml (2)
33-38: Enhance Linux setup reliability.The xvfb installation could be more robust with error handling and version pinning.
- name: Install xvfb if: runner.os == 'Linux' + timeout-minutes: 5 run: | + set -e sudo apt-get update - sudo apt-get install -y xvfb + sudo apt-get install -y xvfb=2:* --no-install-recommends + xvfb-run --version
39-50: Improve test execution robustness.The test execution could benefit from better error handling and test result collection.
- name: Run tests (Linux) if: runner.os == 'Linux' + timeout-minutes: 20 run: | + set -e + mkdir -p test-results xvfb-run --auto-servernum npm run test xvfb-run --auto-servernum npm run test:unit - name: Run tests (macOS/Windows) if: runner.os != 'Linux' + timeout-minutes: 20 run: | + set -e + mkdir -p test-results npm run test npm run test:unit
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/tests.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/tests.yml
17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
53-53: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/tests.yml
[error] 56-56: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 56-56: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/tests.yml (2)
3-8: Consider optimizing workflow triggers with path filters.The workflow could be more efficient by only running when relevant files are changed.
on: push: branches: [ master ] + paths: + - 'src/**' + - 'test/**' + - 'package.json' + - 'package-lock.json' pull_request: branches: [ master ] + paths: + - 'src/**' + - 'test/**' + - 'package.json' + - 'package-lock.json'Also, verify if the repository uses 'master' or 'main' as the default branch name.
✅ Verification successful
Branch name 'master' is correctly configured in the workflow
The verification confirms that 'master' is indeed the default branch name in this repository, so the branch configuration in the workflow file is correct. However, the suggestion to add path filters to optimize the workflow execution remains valid as it would help reduce unnecessary workflow runs.
- Consider adding path filters to both
pushandpull_requesttriggers to run the workflow only when relevant files are changed:paths: - 'src/**' - 'test/**' - 'package.json' - 'package-lock.json'🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the default branch name git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD | sed 's@^refs/remotes/origin/@@'Length of output: 84
1-56: Verify test configuration consistency.Please ensure that all referenced test commands and directories are properly configured.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
53-53: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 56-56: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 56-56: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
.github/workflows/tests.yml
Outdated
| - name: Upload test results | ||
| if: always() | ||
| uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3 | ||
| with: | ||
| name: test-results-${{ matrix.os }} | ||
| path: test-results/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Update artifact upload and fix formatting.
The artifact upload action needs updating, and there are formatting issues to address.
- name: Upload test results
if: always()
- uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
+ uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
with:
name: test-results-${{ matrix.os }}
- path: test-results/
+ path: test-results/
+ if-no-files-found: error📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - name: Upload test results | |
| if: always() | |
| uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3 | |
| with: | |
| name: test-results-${{ matrix.os }} | |
| path: test-results/ | |
| - name: Upload test results | |
| if: always() | |
| uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 | |
| with: | |
| name: test-results-${{ matrix.os }} | |
| path: test-results/ | |
| if-no-files-found: error | |
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
53-53: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 56-56: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 56-56: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
.github/workflows/tests.yml
Outdated
| steps: | ||
| - uses: actions/checkout@v3 | ||
|
|
||
| - name: Setup Node.js | ||
| uses: actions/setup-node@v3 | ||
| with: | ||
| node-version: '18' | ||
| cache: 'npm' | ||
|
|
||
| - name: Install dependencies | ||
| run: | | ||
| npm ci | ||
| npm run install:panels | ||
|
|
||
| - name: Compile | ||
| run: npm run compile | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Update action versions and enhance error handling.
The GitHub Actions being used have newer versions available, and the dependency installation could benefit from better error handling.
- - uses: actions/checkout@v3
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Setup Node.js
- uses: actions/setup-node@v3
+ uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: '18'
cache: 'npm'
- name: Install dependencies
+ timeout-minutes: 15
run: |
+ echo "Installing npm dependencies..."
npm ci
+ if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
+ echo "npm ci failed, retrying once..."
+ npm cache clean --force
+ npm ci
+ fi
npm run install:panels
- name: Compile
+ timeout-minutes: 5
run: npm run compile📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| steps: | |
| - uses: actions/checkout@v3 | |
| - name: Setup Node.js | |
| uses: actions/setup-node@v3 | |
| with: | |
| node-version: '18' | |
| cache: 'npm' | |
| - name: Install dependencies | |
| run: | | |
| npm ci | |
| npm run install:panels | |
| - name: Compile | |
| run: npm run compile | |
| steps: | |
| - uses: actions/checkout@v4 | |
| - name: Setup Node.js | |
| uses: actions/setup-node@v4 | |
| with: | |
| node-version: '18' | |
| cache: 'npm' | |
| - name: Install dependencies | |
| timeout-minutes: 15 | |
| run: | | |
| echo "Installing npm dependencies..." | |
| npm ci | |
| if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then | |
| echo "npm ci failed, retrying once..." | |
| npm cache clean --force | |
| npm ci | |
| fi | |
| npm run install:panels | |
| - name: Compile | |
| timeout-minutes: 5 | |
| run: npm run compile |
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on f5bd7ae in 1 minute and 0 seconds
More details
- Looked at
32lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. package.json:1209
- Draft comment:
Thetestscript should ensure the code is compiled before running tests. Consider addingnpm run compile &&to thetest:unitscript as well for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment is suggesting something that's already handled in a different way - test:unit has a pretest:unit script that runs compilation. While the suggestion would make the scripts more visually consistent, it would be redundant since the compilation is already guaranteed to happen via pretest:unit. The comment shows a lack of understanding of how npm pre-scripts work.
I could be wrong about how npm handles pre-scripts - maybe there are edge cases where having both is beneficial? Also, maybe consistency in script style is more important than I'm giving credit for.
No, npm pre-scripts are a well-established pattern and are guaranteed to run before their main script. Having both would be purely redundant. While consistency is good, introducing redundancy is not the right way to achieve it.
The comment should be deleted because it suggests adding redundant functionality that's already properly handled via the pretest:unit script.
Workflow ID: wflow_bs34c7Qz0jlCcDG5
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/tests.yml (1)
30-32: Add timeout to compilation step.To prevent hanging builds, add a timeout to the compilation step.
Apply this diff:
- name: Compile + timeout-minutes: 5 run: npm run compile
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/tests.yml(1 hunks)package.json(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/tests.yml
17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
51-51: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/tests.yml
[error] 54-54: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 54-54: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
.github/workflows/tests.yml (7)
1-8: LGTM! Workflow triggers are well configured.The workflow is properly set up to run on both push and pull request events targeting the master branch.
9-14: LGTM! Matrix strategy ensures comprehensive platform coverage.The job is well-configured to run tests across all major operating systems: macOS, Ubuntu, and Windows.
16-24: Update GitHub Actions to latest versions.The checkout and Node.js setup actions are using outdated versions.
Apply this diff to update the actions:
- - uses: actions/checkout@v3 + - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Setup Node.js - uses: actions/setup-node@v3 + uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: '18' cache: 'npm'🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
25-29: Enhance dependency installation reliability.The installation step could benefit from better error handling and timeout configuration.
Apply this diff to improve reliability:
- name: Install dependencies + timeout-minutes: 15 run: | + echo "Installing npm dependencies..." npm ci + if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then + echo "npm ci failed, retrying once..." + npm cache clean --force + npm ci + fi npm run install:panels
33-38: LGTM! Linux-specific setup is well configured.The xvfb installation is properly conditioned for Linux runners and includes necessary package updates.
39-48: LGTM! Test execution is properly configured for all platforms.The workflow correctly handles platform-specific test execution, using xvfb-run for Linux and direct execution for macOS/Windows.
49-54: Update artifact upload and fix formatting.The artifact upload action needs updating, and there are formatting issues to address.
Apply this diff:
- name: Upload test results if: always() - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3 + uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 with: name: test-results-${{ matrix.os }} - path: test-results/ + path: test-results/ + if-no-files-found: error🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
51-51: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 54-54: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 54-54: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
package.json (3)
1209-1212: Test script configuration needs improvement.The
testandtest:unitscripts appear to be redundant as they both run the same file.Consider this improvement:
- "test": "npm run compile && node ./out/test/runTest.js", - "test:unit": "node ./out/test/runTest.js", + "test": "node ./out/test/runTest.js --all", + "test:unit": "node ./out/test/runTest.js --unittest", "pretest:unit": "npm run compile", "compile": "tsc -p ./"
1246-1250: LGTM! Testing dependencies are well chosen.The addition of Chai and Sinon along with their TypeScript types provides a robust testing framework with both assertion and mocking capabilities.
20-22: Verify the necessity of the extensionsAny API proposal.The
extensionsAnyAPI proposal has been added. Please ensure this is required for the test framework implementation.Run this script to check its usage:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that the extension is using the VSCode extensions API in its test suite (
src/test/suite/extension.test.ts) to stub extension-related functionality:sandbox.stub(vscode.extensions, "all").value(mockExtensions); sandbox.stub(vscode.extensions, "getExtension").callsFake((id: string) => {The
extensionsAnyAPI proposal is required when an extension needs to access or interact with other extensions in ways that go beyond the stable API. In this case, the extension needs this capability for testing purposes, specifically to mock and stub extension-related functionality in its test suite.The extensionsAny API proposal is correctly added and necessary for the test framework.
- The proposal is used in the test suite to stub
vscode.extensions.allandvscode.extensions.getExtensionfor testing the extension's interaction with other VSCode extensions (specifically with "samuelcolvin.jinjahtml" extension).- This is a common requirement for extensions that need to interact with other extensions, especially in test scenarios.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check where extensionsAny API is used in the codebase # Search for extensionsAny usage in TypeScript files rg -l "extensionsAny" --type ts # Search for references to the proposal in documentation rg -l "extensionsAny.*proposal" --type mdLength of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a broader search to understand the context better # Search for any mentions of extensionsAny in all files rg "extensionsAny" -l # Search for vscode.extensions usage which might indicate the need for this API rg "vscode\.extensions" -A 3 --type ts # Look for package.json files to understand the extension's capabilities fd "package.json" --type f --exec cat {}Length of output: 48200
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on c13fbd8 in 1 minute and 1 seconds
More details
- Looked at
134lines of code in4files - Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. src/test/runTest.ts:6
- Draft comment:
Please specify a return type for themainfunction to improve code clarity and maintainability. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a valid diff hunk.
2. package.json:1212
- Draft comment:
Avoid abbreviating terms in titles or labels. Use 'environment variables' instead of 'env vars' for clarity. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a valid diff hunk.
Workflow ID: wflow_4vgtP6usbYiH8zWV
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
src/test/runTest.ts
Outdated
| const workspaceFolder = path.resolve(__dirname, "../../test-workspace"); | ||
|
|
||
| // Create coverage directory if it doesn't exist | ||
| const coverageDirectory = path.resolve(__dirname, "../../coverage"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding logic to create the coverage directory if it doesn't exist. This will prevent potential errors when running tests with coverage enabled.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
.github/workflows/tests.yml (2)
16-29:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate action versions and enhance dependency installation.
The GitHub Actions being used have newer versions available, and the dependency installation could benefit from better error handling.
- - uses: actions/checkout@v3 + - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Setup Node.js - uses: actions/setup-node@v3 + uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: '18' cache: 'npm' - name: Install dependencies + timeout-minutes: 15 run: | + echo "Installing npm dependencies..." npm ci + if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then + echo "npm ci failed, retrying once..." + npm cache clean --force + npm ci + fi npm run install:panels - name: Compile + timeout-minutes: 5 run: npm run compile🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
49-61:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate artifact upload and fix formatting.
The artifact upload action needs updating, and there are formatting issues to address.
- name: Upload test results if: always() - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3 + uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 with: name: test-results-${{ matrix.os }} - path: test-results/ + path: test-results/ + if-no-files-found: error🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
51-51: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
58-58: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/test/runTest.ts (2)
6-8: Ensure path resolution is platform-independent.The paths are correctly resolved relative to
__dirname, but for maximum reliability across different platforms, consider usingpath.join().- const extensionDevelopmentPath = path.resolve(__dirname, "../../"); - const extensionTestsPath = path.resolve(__dirname, "./suite/index"); - const workspaceFolder = path.resolve(__dirname, "../../test-workspace"); + const extensionDevelopmentPath = path.join(__dirname, "..", ".."); + const extensionTestsPath = path.join(__dirname, "suite", "index"); + const workspaceFolder = path.join(__dirname, "..", "..", "test-workspace");
27-30: Enhance error handling with error details.The current error handling could be more informative.
- } catch (err) { - console.error("Failed to run tests", err); + } catch (err: unknown) { + console.error("Failed to run tests:"); + if (err instanceof Error) { + console.error(`Error message: ${err.message}`); + console.error(`Stack trace: ${err.stack}`); + } else { + console.error("An unknown error occurred:", err); + } process.exit(1); }.github/workflows/tests.yml (1)
39-47: Add timeout configuration for test steps.Test execution steps should have timeout limits to prevent hanging builds.
- name: Run tests (Linux) if: runner.os == 'Linux' + timeout-minutes: 20 run: | xvfb-run --auto-servernum npm run test - name: Run tests (macOS/Windows) if: runner.os != 'Linux' + timeout-minutes: 20 run: | npm run testcodecov.yml (2)
1-10: Consider setting more ambitious coverage targets.While it's good to start with achievable targets, 10% coverage is quite low for a new testing initiative. Consider:
- Gradually increasing the target (e.g., 40-50%) to encourage better test coverage
- Setting different targets for critical vs non-critical code paths
- Adding coverage requirements for new code (patch) to ensure testing of new features
project: default: - target: 10% # the required coverage value + target: 40% # the required coverage value threshold: 1% # the leniency in hitting the target patch: default: - target: 10% + target: 50% # higher target for new code threshold: 1%
12-15: Refine ignore patterns for better precision.The current patterns are good but could be more specific:
ignore: - - "test/**/*" # ignore test files - - "out/**/*" # ignore compiled output - - "**/*.d.ts" # ignore type declaration files + - "test/**/*.test.ts" # ignore only test files + - "test/**/*.spec.ts" # ignore only test files + - "out/**/*.js" # ignore only compiled JS + - "**/*.d.ts" # ignore type declaration filesThis makes the patterns more explicit and reduces the risk of accidentally ignoring important files.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 15-15: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 15-15: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.github/workflows/tests.yml(1 hunks)codecov.yml(1 hunks)package.json(3 hunks)src/test/runTest.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/tests.yml
17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
51-51: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
58-58: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
65-65: the runner of "codecov/codecov-action@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/tests.yml
[error] 70-70: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 70-70: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
codecov.yml
[error] 15-15: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 15-15: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
package.json (2)
Line range hint
1215-1244: LGTM! Dependencies are well-configured.The test-related dependencies are properly added with appropriate version constraints.
1209-1210: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionDifferentiate test scripts or remove redundancy.
The
testandtest:unitscripts are running the same file, which seems redundant.Consider differentiating them or removing one:
- "test": "npm run compile && node ./out/test/runTest.js", - "test:unit": "node ./out/test/runTest.js", + "test": "npm run test:unit", + "test:unit": "node ./out/test/runTest.js", + "test:coverage": "nyc npm run test:unit",Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/test/runTest.ts
Outdated
| // Create coverage directory if it doesn't exist | ||
| const coverageDirectory = path.resolve(__dirname, "../../coverage"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add directory creation logic for coverage.
The code resolves the coverage directory path but doesn't ensure its existence.
Add directory creation:
// Create coverage directory if it doesn't exist
const coverageDirectory = path.resolve(__dirname, "../../coverage");
+const fs = require("fs");
+if (!fs.existsSync(coverageDirectory)) {
+ fs.mkdirSync(coverageDirectory, { recursive: true });
+}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
.github/workflows/tests.yml
Outdated
| - name: Upload coverage to Codecov | ||
| if: always() | ||
| uses: codecov/codecov-action@v3 | ||
| with: | ||
| directory: ./coverage/ | ||
| flags: unittests | ||
| name: codecov-${{ matrix.os }} | ||
| fail_ci_if_error: false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update Codecov action and fix YAML formatting.
The Codecov action version needs updating, and there are YAML formatting issues to fix.
- name: Upload coverage to Codecov
if: always()
- uses: codecov/codecov-action@v3
+ uses: codecov/codecov-action@v4
with:
directory: ./coverage/
flags: unittests
name: codecov-${{ matrix.os }}
- fail_ci_if_error: false
+ fail_ci_if_error: false
+📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - name: Upload coverage to Codecov | |
| if: always() | |
| uses: codecov/codecov-action@v3 | |
| with: | |
| directory: ./coverage/ | |
| flags: unittests | |
| name: codecov-${{ matrix.os }} | |
| fail_ci_if_error: false | |
| - name: Upload coverage to Codecov | |
| if: always() | |
| uses: codecov/codecov-action@v4 | |
| with: | |
| directory: ./coverage/ | |
| flags: unittests | |
| name: codecov-${{ matrix.os }} | |
| fail_ci_if_error: false | |
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
65-65: the runner of "codecov/codecov-action@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 70-70: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 70-70: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
| ignore: | ||
| - "test/**/*" # ignore test files | ||
| - "out/**/*" # ignore compiled output | ||
| - "**/*.d.ts" # ignore type declaration files |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Fix YAML formatting issues.
The static analysis tools identified formatting issues:
- Add a newline at the end of the file
- Remove trailing spaces after the comment
- - "**/*.d.ts" # ignore type declaration files
+ - "**/*.d.ts" # ignore type declaration files
+📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - "**/*.d.ts" # ignore type declaration files | |
| - "**/*.d.ts" # ignore type declaration files | |
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 15-15: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 15-15: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
codecov.yml
Outdated
| coverage: | ||
| status: | ||
| project: | ||
| default: | ||
| target: 10% # the required coverage value | ||
| threshold: 1% # the leniency in hitting the target | ||
| patch: | ||
| default: | ||
| target: 10% | ||
| threshold: 1% | ||
|
|
||
| ignore: | ||
| - "test/**/*" # ignore test files | ||
| - "out/**/*" # ignore compiled output | ||
| - "**/*.d.ts" # ignore type declaration files |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Codecov integration needs additional configuration in CI pipeline
The codecov.yml configuration is properly set up with coverage thresholds and ignore patterns, but there are a few gaps in the CI integration:
- The workflow correctly uploads coverage artifacts and uses the Codecov action
- However, no coverage generation command is found in package.json scripts
- The test command doesn't include coverage reporting flags
Required changes:
- Add a coverage generation script in package.json (e.g., using Jest or other test runner with coverage flags)
- Update the workflow's test steps to use the coverage command instead of regular test command
- Ensure coverage output directory matches the one specified in workflow (
./coverage/)
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify Codecov integration in CI pipeline.
Since this is part of setting up the testing framework, let's ensure proper integration:
Let me gather more information about the CI integration by checking the workflow file content and any test coverage commands.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Codecov configuration and CI integration
# Check if the GitHub Actions workflow includes Codecov upload
echo "Checking for Codecov action in workflows..."
rg -l "codecov/codecov-action" .github/workflows/
# Verify test script configuration
echo "Checking for coverage-related scripts in package.json..."
jq '.scripts | keys | .[] | select(contains("coverage"))' package.json
Length of output: 370
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the workflow file to verify Codecov setup
echo "Content of tests.yml workflow:"
cat .github/workflows/tests.yml
# Check package.json for test scripts
echo -e "\nTest scripts in package.json:"
jq '.scripts' package.json
Length of output: 2828
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 15-15: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 15-15: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on a57c83b in 41 seconds
More details
- Looked at
94lines of code in4files - Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3drafted comments based on config settings.
1. src/test/runTest.ts:10
- Draft comment:
Consider ensuring that the coverage directory is created elsewhere if needed, and verify if the removed environment variables are required for coverage reporting. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful.
2. src/test/runTest.ts:7
- Draft comment:
Please provide a return type for themainfunction to ensure easier refactoring and better readability. This applies to other utility functions as well. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a valid diff hunk.
3. package.json:1209
- Draft comment:
Do not abbreviate terms in titles or labels. Use 'environment variables' instead of 'env vars'. This applies to other similar instances as well. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_P5RgGrJDXlu1EE2L
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/tests.yml (3)
25-29: Enhance dependency installation with better error handling.The dependency installation step could benefit from better error handling and timeout configuration.
Apply this diff to improve the installation step:
- name: Install dependencies + timeout-minutes: 15 run: | + echo "Installing npm dependencies..." npm ci + if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then + echo "npm ci failed, retrying once..." + npm cache clean --force + npm ci + fi npm run install:panels
30-32: Add timeout to compilation step.The compilation step should have a timeout to prevent hanging builds.
Apply this diff:
- name: Compile + timeout-minutes: 5 run: npm run compile
56-65: Update artifact upload action for coverage results.The coverage results upload action is using an outdated version.
Apply this diff:
- name: Upload coverage results if: always() - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3 + uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 with: name: coverage-${{ matrix.os }} path: | coverage/ .nyc_output/ *.lcov + if-no-files-found: warn🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
58-58: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.c8rc.json(1 hunks).github/workflows/tests.yml(1 hunks)package.json(3 hunks)src/test/runTest.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .c8rc.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/test/runTest.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/tests.yml
17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
51-51: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
58-58: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
68-68: the runner of "codecov/codecov-action@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/tests.yml
[error] 73-73: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 73-73: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/tests.yml (4)
1-8: LGTM!The workflow trigger configuration is correctly set up to run on push and pull request events targeting the master branch.
17-23: Update GitHub Actions to their latest versions.The checkout and setup-node actions are using outdated versions.
Apply this diff to update the actions:
- - uses: actions/checkout@v3 + - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Setup Node.js - uses: actions/setup-node@v3 + uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: '18' cache: 'npm'🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
49-55: Update artifact upload action and enhance error handling.The artifact upload action needs updating and could benefit from better error handling.
Apply this diff:
- name: Upload test results if: always() - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3 + uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 with: name: test-results-${{ matrix.os }} path: test-results/ + if-no-files-found: error🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
51-51: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
66-73: Update Codecov action and fix YAML formatting.The Codecov action needs updating and there are YAML formatting issues to fix.
Apply this diff:
- name: Upload coverage to Codecov if: always() - uses: codecov/codecov-action@v3 + uses: codecov/codecov-action@v4 with: directory: ./coverage/ flags: unittests name: codecov-${{ matrix.os }} - fail_ci_if_error: false + fail_ci_if_error: false +🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
68-68: the runner of "codecov/codecov-action@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 73-73: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 73-73: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
package.json (2)
Line range hint
1216-1255: LGTM!The new dependencies are appropriate for the testing infrastructure:
- Testing frameworks: chai, sinon
- Coverage tool: c8
- TypeScript tools: ts-node
- Development tools: glob-parent
1208-1213: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionDifferentiate test scripts or remove redundancy.
The test scripts have overlapping functionality:
testandtest:coverageare identicaltest:unitappears to be a subset of the coverage testsConsider this restructuring:
- "test": "c8 --reporter=lcov --reporter=text node ./out/test/runTest.js", - "test:coverage": "c8 --reporter=lcov --reporter=text node ./out/test/runTest.js", - "test:unit": "node ./out/test/runTest.js", + "test": "npm run test:unit", + "test:coverage": "c8 --reporter=lcov --reporter=text npm run test:unit", + "test:unit": "node ./out/test/runTest.js", "pretest:unit": "npm run compile", "compile": "tsc -p ./"Likely invalid or redundant comment.
package.json
Outdated
| "enabledApiProposals": [ | ||
| "extensionsAny" | ||
| ], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Remove extensionsAny API proposal as it's not being used in the codebase
The extensionsAny API proposal is enabled in package.json but there's no actual usage of this experimental feature in the codebase. The only occurrences found are in package.json and CONTRIBUTING.md (which doesn't contain any relevant information about this feature). Since experimental API proposals should only be enabled when they're actually needed, this should be removed to avoid potential stability issues.
- Remove the
extensionsAnyentry from theenabledApiProposalsarray in package.json
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the need for extensionsAny API proposal.
The extensionsAny API proposal has been added. This is an experimental feature that might affect the stability of the extension.
Run the following script to check its usage:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check where extensionsAny API is being used
# Test: Search for extensionsAny usage in the codebase
rg -l "extensionsAny"
Length of output: 34
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any usage of the API in the code with context
rg -C 3 "extensionsAny"
# Also search for any configuration or documentation mentioning this feature
fd -e md -e json -e js -e ts | xargs rg -l "extension.*any"
Length of output: 319
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the CONTRIBUTING.md to see if it explains the usage of this feature
cat CONTRIBUTING.md
Length of output: 6464
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 4a87310 in 49 seconds
More details
- Looked at
30lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/tests.yml:38
- Draft comment:
Including the Node.js version in the cache key can prevent issues when the Node.js version changes.
key: ${{ runner.os }}-node-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') }}-node-version-${{ matrix.node-version }}
- Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
Since Node.js version is fixed at '18', adding it to the cache key provides no additional value. The cache will already be invalidated if package-lock.json changes, which is the main thing that matters. The suggestion would add complexity without benefit. If the Node version were part of a matrix strategy, this might be more relevant.
What if someone changes the Node.js version in the future? The cache might serve stale modules built for a different version.
If the Node.js version changes, it would likely come with package-lock.json changes which would already invalidate the cache. npm ci ensures clean installs.
The comment should be deleted as it suggests a change that adds complexity without providing meaningful benefit in the current setup with a fixed Node.js version.
2. .github/workflows/tests.yml:25
- Draft comment:
Avoid abbreviating terms in comments. Use 'environment variables' instead of 'env vars' for clarity. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_TrUvVzE2kYxKbvRb
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
src/manifest/dbtProject.ts
Outdated
| process.env.NODE_ENV === "test" | ||
| ? new MockEventEmitter<RunResultsEvent>() | ||
| : new EventEmitter<RunResultsEvent>(); |
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 5955a30 in 1 minute and 11 seconds
More details
- Looked at
157lines of code in7files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
6drafted comments based on config settings.
1. src/utils/EventEmitterFactory.ts:5
- Draft comment:
The return type ofcreate<T>should be consistent. Consider using a common interface forEventEmitter<T>andMockEventEmitter<T>to ensure type consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The current union type is actually a valid and common TypeScript pattern. Creating an interface would add complexity without clear benefits. The types are already consistent through TypeScript's type system. Both emitters likely have compatible methods since MockEventEmitter is designed to mock EventEmitter.
I might be underestimating the value of having a common interface for testing purposes. There could be subtle differences between the real and mock implementations that an interface would catch.
While an interface could help catch implementation differences, the current approach using a union type is sufficient and follows TypeScript best practices. The mock implementation's compatibility is a testing concern that should be handled in tests.
Delete the comment as it suggests additional complexity without clear benefits. The current type declaration is already clear and type-safe.
2. src/dbt_client/dbtTerminal.ts:11
- Draft comment:
Ensure thatEventEmitterFactory.createreturns a consistent type. Consider using a common interface forEventEmitter<T>andMockEventEmitter<T>to ensure type consistency. This comment applies to other instances whereEventEmitterFactory.createis used. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
3. src/utils/EventEmitterFactory.ts:5
- Draft comment:
Please specify a return type for thecreatefunction to improve code readability and maintainability. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
4. src/utils/EventEmitterFactory.ts:6
- Draft comment:
Avoid using abbreviations likeNODE_ENV. Use full terms for clarity, such asprocess.environment.NODE_ENVIRONMENT. This applies to other instances where environment variables are used. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
While the rule about avoiding abbreviations is listed in the additional rules, NODE_ENV is a standard environment variable name in Node.js ecosystems. Changing it would actually break functionality since NODE_ENV is the canonical name that Node.js and build tools expect. This isn't a custom environment variable we created - it's a platform standard.
The rule about avoiding abbreviations is explicitly listed in the additional rules, so maybe we should enforce it strictly regardless of conventions?
No - we shouldn't suggest changes that would break functionality. Platform-standard names are an exception to our abbreviation rule.
Delete this comment because NODE_ENV is a standard Node.js environment variable name that shouldn't be changed, even though it contains an abbreviation.
5. src/dbt_client/dbtTerminal.ts:11
- Draft comment:
Avoid using abbreviations likeNODE_ENV. Use full terms for clarity, such asprocess.environment.NODE_ENVIRONMENT. This applies to other instances where environment variables are used. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
6. src/manifest/dbtProject.ts:95
- Draft comment:
Avoid using abbreviations likeNODE_ENV. Use full terms for clarity, such asprocess.environment.NODE_ENVIRONMENT. This applies to other instances where environment variables are used. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
Workflow ID: wflow_aOkZIOtj1xRymVec
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 98a47df in 41 seconds
More details
- Looked at
149lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/ci.yml:5
- Draft comment:
Consider specifying branches to trigger the workflow on, instead of using "*", to avoid unnecessary runs on all branches. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The workflow is set to trigger on all branches, which might not be ideal for all projects.
2. .github/workflows/ci.yml:5
- Draft comment:
Avoid abbreviating terms in titles or labels. Use 'environment variables' instead of 'env vars' for clarity. This applies to any other instances in the codebase. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_gLUpzFCKECwEcdeF
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on a5cb31a in 1 minute and 12 seconds
More details
- Looked at
149lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/ci.yml:12
- Draft comment:
The CI workflow no longer includes a job to run tests, which is essential for ensuring code quality. Consider adding a test job to execute unit and integration tests before proceeding with builds or releases. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The tests appear to have been moved to a common-build action rather than being removed entirely. Without seeing the contents of the common-build action, we cannot definitively say that tests are missing. The change seems to be a refactor to reduce duplication across workflows.
I might be wrong about the common-build action containing the tests. The comment could be raising a valid concern about test removal.
However, since we can't see the common-build action contents, we don't have strong evidence that tests are actually missing. The comment is speculative without this context.
We should delete this comment since we lack the context to verify if tests are actually missing, and the change appears to be a refactor into a shared action.
2. .github/workflows/ci.yml:38
- Draft comment:
Avoid abbreviating terms in labels or titles. Use 'environment variables' instead of 'env'. This applies to other instances in the file as well. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
- The 'env:' keyword is part of GitHub Actions' built-in syntax and cannot be changed. 2. There are no other abbreviations in labels or titles that could be expanded. 3. The comment is suggesting changes to something that is part of the platform's syntax, which would actually break the workflow if changed.
Could there be other abbreviations in the file that I missed? Maybe the comment is referring to job or step names?
After reviewing all job names and step names in the file, they all use full words (like "release-vsstudio-marketplace", "Checkout", "Publish Visual Studio Marketplace"). The only abbreviations are either platform-specific (VSCE, OVSX) or standard YAML syntax (env).
The comment should be deleted because it suggests changing a standard GitHub Actions syntax keyword that cannot be modified, and there are no other problematic abbreviations in the custom labels or titles.
Workflow ID: wflow_uR7rROMsFo3GO7x3
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on f366ca8 in 1 minute and 3 seconds
More details
- Looked at
56lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/tests.yml:5
- Draft comment:
Consider allowing the workflow to run on all branches by usingbranches: [ "*" ]for bothpushandpull_requestevents. This ensures that tests are run on all branches, not justmaster. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The change in the diff appears to be intentional - moving from all branches to master-only. This is a common pattern to conserve CI resources by only running tests on the main branch and PRs targeting it. The comment is suggesting to revert an intentional change without understanding the rationale. CI minutes are often limited and costly.
Perhaps there are security or compliance reasons why running tests on all branches would be beneficial. Maybe some critical bugs could be caught earlier in feature branches.
While testing all branches provides more coverage, it's a resource optimization decision that should be left to the team. The current setup still ensures code is tested before merging to master.
Delete this comment as it's suggesting to revert an intentional optimization without strong justification, and CI configuration choices should be left to the team's discretion.
2. .github/workflows/tests.yml:5
- Draft comment:
Use semantic versioning (semver) for version comparisons instead of direct array index comparisons. This applies to other similar instances in the file as well. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a valid diff hunk.
Workflow ID: wflow_yBvSfDcEzQeaUHXJ
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
| @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ const config = { | |||
| rules: [ | |||
| { | |||
| test: /\.ts$/, | |||
| exclude: /node_modules/, | |||
| exclude: /(node_modules|src\/test)/, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@saravmajestic: I think this is right. One other approach is to use dependency injection and change the injection to inject the mock eventemitter only in tests (no test code in production code)
| if (stream instanceof ReadableStream) { | ||
| const reader = stream.getReader(); | ||
| const decoder = new TextDecoder(); | ||
| let result = ""; | ||
| try { | ||
| while (true) { | ||
| const { done, value } = await reader.read(); | ||
| if (done) { | ||
| break; | ||
| } | ||
| const chunk = decoder.decode(value, { stream: true }); | ||
| result += chunk; | ||
| cb(chunk); | ||
| } | ||
| return result; | ||
| } finally { | ||
| reader.releaseLock(); | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| return new Promise((resolve, reject) => { | ||
| let result = ""; | ||
| stream.on("data", (chunk: Buffer) => { | ||
| const data = chunk.toString(); | ||
| result += data; | ||
| cb(data); | ||
| }); | ||
| stream.on("end", () => resolve(result)); | ||
| stream.on("error", reject); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this code change required?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is needed for mocking the stream response. I have verified the streaming functionality and it works fine
src/commandProcessExecution.ts
Outdated
| ), | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
reverted these changes now
src/altimate.ts
Outdated
| @@ -345,6 +345,11 @@ export class AltimateRequest { | |||
| private pythonEnvironment: PythonEnvironment, | |||
| ) {} | |||
|
|
|||
| private async customFetch<T>(url: string, init?: RequestInit) { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| private async customFetch<T>(url: string, init?: RequestInit) { | |
| private async fetch<T>(url: string, init?: RequestInit) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we already have fetch method defined, so created customFetch
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| private async customFetch<T>(url: string, init?: RequestInit) { | |
| private async internalFetch<T>(url: string, init?: RequestInit) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on dcf324b in 45 seconds
More details
- Looked at
172lines of code in5files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4drafted comments based on config settings.
1. src/dbt_client/dbtTerminal.ts:10
- Draft comment:
TheEventEmitterFactoryhas been removed and replaced with directEventEmitterusage. Ensure that the testing environment is correctly set up to handle this change. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The removal of EventEmitterFactory and its replacement with direct EventEmitter usage is a significant change. This affects multiple files where EventEmitterFactory was used. The change is consistent across the files, but it is important to ensure that the testing environment is correctly set up to handle the direct use of EventEmitter.
2. src/manifest/dbtProject.ts:608
- Draft comment:
The removal of the try-catch block ingenerateDocsImmediatelycould lead to unhandled errors ifexecuteCommandImmediatelythrows an error. Ensure that error handling is managed appropriately elsewhere. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful.
3. src/test/suite/dbtCoreIntegration.test.ts:63
- Draft comment:
The change fromMockEventEmittertoEventEmitteris consistent with the removal ofEventEmitterFactory. Ensure that the tests still function correctly with this setup. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The change fromMockEventEmittertoEventEmitterin the test files is consistent with the removal ofEventEmitterFactory. This change should be verified to ensure that the tests still function correctly with the new setup.
4. src/test/suite/testParser.test.ts:28
- Draft comment:
The change fromMockEventEmittertoEventEmitteris consistent with the removal ofEventEmitterFactory. Ensure that the tests still function correctly with this setup. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The change fromMockEventEmittertoEventEmitterin the test files is consistent with the removal ofEventEmitterFactory. This change should be verified to ensure that the tests still function correctly with the new setup.
Workflow ID: wflow_rNyCanUm2Asu4MMV
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
.github/workflows/tests.yml (2)
16-34: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionUpdate action versions and enhance dependency installation reliability.
The checkout and setup-node actions are using outdated versions. Also, the installation steps could benefit from timeouts and better error handling.
- - uses: actions/checkout@v3 + - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Setup Node.js - uses: actions/setup-node@v3 + uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: '18' cache: 'npm' cache-dependency-path: | package-lock.json new_lineage_panel/package-lock.json webview_panels/package-lock.json - name: Install dependencies + timeout-minutes: 15 run: | + echo "Installing npm dependencies..." npm ci + if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then + echo "npm ci failed, retrying once..." + npm cache clean --force + npm ci + fi npm run install:panels - name: Compile + timeout-minutes: 5 run: npm run compile🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
48-72: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionUpdate artifact/coverage actions and fix formatting issues.
The upload-artifact and codecov actions are using outdated versions. Also, there are some improvements needed for artifact handling and YAML formatting.
- name: Upload test results if: always() - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3 + uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 with: name: test-results-${{ matrix.os }} path: test-results/ + if-no-files-found: error - name: Upload coverage results if: always() - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3 + uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 with: name: coverage-${{ matrix.os }} path: | coverage/ .nyc_output/ *.lcov + if-no-files-found: error - name: Upload coverage to Codecov if: always() - uses: codecov/codecov-action@v3 + uses: codecov/codecov-action@v4 with: token: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }} directory: ./coverage/ flags: unittests name: codecov-${{ matrix.os }} - fail_ci_if_error: false + fail_ci_if_error: false +🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
50-50: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
57-57: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
66-66: the runner of "codecov/codecov-action@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 72-72: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 72-72: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/tests.yml (2)
1-8: Consider a more descriptive workflow name and broader branch coverage.The current workflow name "Tests" is too generic. Consider renaming it to better reflect its purpose, e.g., "Cross-Platform Integration Tests".
Also, as previously discussed, consider running tests on all branches to catch issues earlier.
name: Tests on: push: - branches: [ master ] + branches: [ '**' ] pull_request: - branches: [ master ] + branches: [ '**' ]
35-48: Remove redundant compilation step in test commands.The test commands include
npm run compile, which is redundant since compilation is already performed in the previous step.- name: Run tests (Linux) if: runner.os == 'Linux' run: | - xvfb-run --auto-servernum npm run compile && xvfb-run --auto-servernum npm run test:coverage + xvfb-run --auto-servernum npm run test:coverage - name: Run tests (macOS/Windows) if: runner.os != 'Linux' run: | - npm run compile && npm run test:coverage + npm run test:coverage
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.github/workflows/tests.yml(1 hunks)src/dbt_client/dbtTerminal.ts(2 hunks)src/test/suite/dbtCoreIntegration.test.ts(1 hunks)src/test/suite/testParser.test.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- src/test/suite/testParser.test.ts
- src/test/suite/dbtCoreIntegration.test.ts
- src/dbt_client/dbtTerminal.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/tests.yml
17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
50-50: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
57-57: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
66-66: the runner of "codecov/codecov-action@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/tests.yml
[error] 72-72: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 72-72: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest)
- GitHub Check: test (windows-latest)
- GitHub Check: test (ubuntu-latest)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on bcd4563 in 44 seconds
More details
- Looked at
65lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. src/test/suite/commandProcessExecution.test.ts:70
- Draft comment:
The test for command cancellation is skipped but should be removed since the cancellation logic has been removed from the implementation. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
I need to be careful here. While the test is clearly skipped, I don't have access to the implementation code to verify if the cancellation logic has actually been removed. The test itself looks well-structured and tests a real cancellation scenario, so it's possible the skip is temporary or the comment is incorrect about the implementation.
I can't verify if the cancellation logic has actually been removed from the implementation since I don't have access to those files. The comment could be making an incorrect assumption.
Without being able to verify the claim about removed implementation code, and given the rule about needing strong evidence, I should err on the side of not keeping speculative comments.
Delete the comment since we can't verify its claim about removed implementation code, and keeping incorrect comments could be misleading.
2. src/test/suite/commandProcessExecution.test.ts:70
- Draft comment:
The test case for command cancellation is currently skipped. Ensure to revisit and enable it if necessary. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The test case for command cancellation is skipped, which might be intentional for now. However, ensure that the test is revisited and enabled if necessary.
Workflow ID: wflow_41dG4P5s7F1ajXKY
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
.github/workflows/tests.yml
Outdated
| push: | ||
| branches: [ master ] | ||
| pull_request: | ||
| branches: [ master ] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also pull requests on other branches than master should have it
src/altimate.ts
Outdated
| @@ -345,6 +345,11 @@ export class AltimateRequest { | |||
| private pythonEnvironment: PythonEnvironment, | |||
| ) {} | |||
|
|
|||
| private async customFetch<T>(url: string, init?: RequestInit) { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| private async customFetch<T>(url: string, init?: RequestInit) { | |
| private async internalFetch<T>(url: string, init?: RequestInit) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 83ace2d in 31 seconds
More details
- Looked at
37lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. webview_panels/src/modules/queryPanel/components/queryLimit/QueryLimit.tsx:64
- Draft comment:
Consider specifying a radix when usingparseIntto avoid unexpected results. For example, useparseInt(value, 10). This is also applicable on line 86. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a valid diff hunk.
2. webview_panels/src/modules/queryPanel/components/queryLimit/QueryLimit.tsx:47
- Draft comment:
Please specify a return type for thesaveLimitfunction to improve code readability and maintainability. This applies to other utility functions as well. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a valid diff hunk.
Workflow ID: wflow_YcBbsZ9LoCB8V4Fh
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
webview_panels/src/modules/commonActionButtons/CommonActionButtons.tsx (1)
20-20: Great accessibility improvement!Adding the title attribute improves the user experience by providing a tooltip description for the action button.
Consider these additional accessibility enhancements:
- Add
aria-labelfor better screen reader support- Add
aria-expandedto indicate the popover state- button={<Button outline title="More actions" icon={<MoreIcon />} />} + button={ + <Button + outline + title="More actions" + aria-label="More actions" + aria-expanded={false} + icon={<MoreIcon />} + /> + }webview_panels/src/modules/queryPanel/components/queryLimit/QueryLimit.tsx (1)
60-61: Consider streamlining number input handling.While adding
idandtype="number"attributes is good, there's potential for conflict between the browser's built-in number input validation and the custom digit-stripping logic in onChange. This could lead to inconsistent behavior across browsers.Consider one of these approaches:
- type="number" - value={value} - onChange={(e) => { - const newValue = e.target.value.replace(/[^\d]/g, ""); - setValue(newValue); - }} + type="number" + value={value} + onChange={(e) => setValue(e.target.value)} + min="1"Or if you need more control:
- type="number" + type="text" + inputMode="numeric" + pattern="[0-9]*" value={value} onChange={(e) => { const newValue = e.target.value.replace(/[^\d]/g, ""); setValue(newValue); }}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
webview_panels/src/modules/commonActionButtons/CommonActionButtons.tsx(1 hunks)webview_panels/src/modules/queryPanel/components/queryLimit/QueryLimit.tsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
webview_panels/src/modules/queryPanel/components/queryLimit/QueryLimit.tsx (2)
50-52: Great accessibility improvement!Converting the span to a semantic label element with proper htmlFor attribute improves accessibility by creating a programmatic association between the label and input field.
Line range hint
1-109: Add test coverage for the QueryLimit component.Since this PR introduces testing infrastructure, consider adding tests for this component covering:
- Input validation
- Limit saving functionality
- UI state changes (Default/Dirty/Saved states)
- Integration with executeRequestInAsync
Let's check if any tests exist for this component:
Would you like me to help create a test suite for this component?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 02db16a in 56 seconds
More details
- Looked at
74lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4drafted comments based on config settings.
1. src/altimate.ts:348
- Draft comment:
Consider renaminginternalFetchto a more descriptive name likefetchWithNodeto better convey its purpose. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The change from 'customFetch' to 'internalFetch' is consistent across the file, but the function name 'internalFetch' is not descriptive of its purpose. A more descriptive name would improve code readability.
2. .github/workflows/tests.yml:5
- Draft comment:
Usingbranches: ["*"]will trigger the workflow on all branches. Ensure this is the intended behavior to avoid unnecessary runs. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The workflow is set to trigger on all branches, which might not be the intended behavior. This can lead to unnecessary workflow runs.
3. src/altimate.ts:348
- Draft comment:
Please specify a return type for theinternalFetchfunction to improve code readability and refactoring. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
4. src/altimate.ts:785
- Draft comment:
Please specify a return type for theinternalFetchfunction to improve code readability and refactoring. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
Workflow ID: wflow_z2NlBGpGG9ahIqAh
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/altimate.ts (1)
Line range hint
779-787: UseinternalFetchfor consistency.This method still uses the direct
fetchcall while other methods have been updated to useinternalFetch. Update for consistency with the rest of the class.async validateCredentials(instance: string, key: string) { const url = `${AltimateRequest.ALTIMATE_URL}/dbt/v3/validate-credentials`; - const response = await fetch(url, { + const response = await this.internalFetch(url, { method: "GET", headers: { "x-tenant": instance, Authorization: "Bearer " + key, "Content-Type": "application/json", }, }); + if (response.ok && response.status === 200) { + return (await response.json()) as Record<string, any> | undefined; + } + if (response.status === 403) { + throw new ForbiddenError(); + } + const textResponse = await response.text(); + throw new APIError( + `Could not process request, server responded with ${response.status}: ${textResponse}` + ); - return (await response.json()) as Record<string, any> | undefined; }
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
.github/workflows/tests.yml (3)
16-34: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionUpdate action versions and enhance error handling.
The GitHub Actions being used have newer versions available, and the dependency installation could benefit from better error handling.
- - uses: actions/checkout@v3 + - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Setup Node.js - uses: actions/setup-node@v3 + uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: '18' cache: 'npm' - name: Install dependencies + timeout-minutes: 15 run: | + echo "Installing npm dependencies..." npm ci + if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then + echo "npm ci failed, retrying once..." + npm cache clean --force + npm ci + fi npm run install:panels - name: Compile + timeout-minutes: 5 run: npm run compile🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
49-54: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionUpdate artifact upload and fix formatting.
- name: Upload test results if: always() - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3 + uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 with: name: test-results-${{ matrix.os }} - path: test-results/ + path: test-results/ + if-no-files-found: error🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
50-50: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
65-72: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionUpdate Codecov action and fix YAML formatting.
- name: Upload coverage to Codecov if: always() - uses: codecov/codecov-action@v3 + uses: codecov/codecov-action@v4 with: token: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }} directory: ./coverage/ flags: unittests name: codecov-${{ matrix.os }} - fail_ci_if_error: false + fail_ci_if_error: false +🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
66-66: the runner of "codecov/codecov-action@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 72-72: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 72-72: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/altimate.ts (1)
348-351: LGTM! Consider removing unused type parameter.The implementation correctly encapsulates the dynamic import of node-fetch. However, the generic type parameter
Tis not being used in the method signature or implementation.- private async internalFetch<T>(url: string, init?: RequestInit) { + private async internalFetch(url: string, init?: RequestInit) {.github/workflows/tests.yml (1)
35-48: Enhance test execution reliability.Add timeouts and improve error handling for test execution steps.
- name: Run tests (Linux) if: runner.os == 'Linux' + timeout-minutes: 20 run: | + set -e xvfb-run --auto-servernum npm run compile && xvfb-run --auto-servernum npm run test:coverage - name: Run tests (macOS/Windows) if: runner.os != 'Linux' + timeout-minutes: 20 run: | + set -e npm run compile && npm run test:coverage
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/tests.yml(1 hunks)src/altimate.ts(7 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/tests.yml
17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
50-50: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
57-57: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
66-66: the runner of "codecov/codecov-action@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/tests.yml
[error] 72-72: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 72-72: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/altimate.ts (5)
428-428: LGTM! Consistent with refactoring.The update to use
internalFetchis consistent with the refactoring while maintaining the existing error handling and timeout logic.
529-529: LGTM! Consistent with refactoring.The update to use
internalFetchis consistent with the refactoring while maintaining the existing error handling.
605-605: LGTM! Consistent with refactoring.The update to use
internalFetchis consistent with the refactoring while maintaining the existing error handling and timeout logic.
693-699: Clarify the purpose ofagent: undefined.While the update to use
internalFetchand the added error handling for non-OK responses are good improvements, please clarify whyagent: undefinedis needed in the fetch options.
788-788: LGTM! Consistent with refactoring.The update to use
internalFetchis consistent with the refactoring while maintaining the existing error handling..github/workflows/tests.yml (2)
1-15: LGTM! Well-structured workflow setup.The workflow is properly configured to run on all branches with a good matrix strategy for cross-platform testing.
55-64: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionUpdate coverage artifact upload configuration.
- name: Upload coverage results if: always() - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3 + uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 with: name: coverage-${{ matrix.os }} path: | coverage/ .nyc_output/ *.lcov + if-no-files-found: errorLikely invalid or redundant comment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
57-57: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
Overview
Problem
Describe the problem you are solving. Mention the ticket/issue if applicable.
Solution
Describe the implemented solution. Add external references if needed.
Screenshot/Demo
A picture is worth a thousand words. Please highlight the changes if applicable.
How to test
Checklist
README.mdupdated and added information about my changeImportant
Introduces a Jest-based unit testing framework with CI/CD integration, code coverage, and various codebase improvements.
tests.yml).NoCredentialsErrorclass for handling missing credentials.CommonActionButtons.tsxandQueryLimit.tsx.altimate.test.ts,commandProcessExecution.test.ts, and others.codecov.yml) and instrumentation (.nycrc.json).mock/vscode.tsandmock/lib.ts.package.json.jest.config.js,.nycrc.json).dbtTerminal.ts.utils.ts..gitignoreto exclude additional files and directories.package.json.webpack.config.js.This description was created by
for 02db16a. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Testing Improvements
Infrastructure
Bug Fixes
Chores