Skip to content

Conversation

@byjtew
Copy link
Collaborator

@byjtew byjtew commented Jan 29, 2024

Closes #278

@byjtew byjtew requested a review from anyzelman January 29, 2024 15:48
@byjtew byjtew changed the base branch from master to develop January 29, 2024 15:49
@anyzelman anyzelman added this to the v0.8 milestone Feb 5, 2024
@byjtew byjtew requested a review from anyzelman February 26, 2024 14:09
@anyzelman
Copy link
Member

Ready to merge

@GiovaGa GiovaGa force-pushed the 664-missing-assertions-for-threaded-execution branch from 48a6c1a to 775ca77 Compare October 22, 2025 07:36
@GiovaGa
Copy link
Collaborator

GiovaGa commented Oct 22, 2025

@anyzelman this seems solved, I don't know if we want a clearer error message to be outputted instead of a possibly cryptic assertion error.
I will run unit tests on the internal CI just to be sure, but should be good to go

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Missing assertions for threaded execution

4 participants