Problem
Some public-facing text reads like chat-derived AI output: broad claims, explanatory overreach, dramatic phrasing, and implementation storytelling that may distract from trust in the tool.
Acceptance criteria
- Review README, CHANGELOG, issue templates, release notes, and SECURITY.md for AI-sounding phrasing.
- Replace exaggerated or narrative language with concise operator-facing statements.
- Keep the AI-agent use case because it is core to the project, but avoid visible "AI wrote this" texture.
- Remove stale chat/session references unless they are converted into neutral regression-test context.
- Ensure the first viewport of the README explains what the tool does, who it is for, and the risk boundary without hype.
Verification
- Public docs still explain the value proposition clearly.
- A new reader can distinguish verified behavior from planned behavior.
Problem
Some public-facing text reads like chat-derived AI output: broad claims, explanatory overreach, dramatic phrasing, and implementation storytelling that may distract from trust in the tool.
Acceptance criteria
Verification