Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding a new dispatcher cache control header filter based on the resource type of the page #2451

Closed
mariahada opened this issue Oct 20, 2020 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@mariahada
Copy link

I would like to propose a new feature to add a new dispatcher cache control header filter so that it is based on the resource type of a page combined with the filter pattern. It will only cover the max age header.

mariahada pushed a commit to mariahada/acs-aem-commons that referenced this issue Oct 20, 2020
…l header filter based on the resource type of the page
@mariahada
Copy link
Author

Does anyone know how this can be fixed?

Could not evaluate: org.apache.jackrabbit.vault.packaging.PackageException: javax.jcr.nodetype.ConstraintViolationException: OakConstraint0021: /home/users/system/acs-commons/resource-type-dispatcher-header-filter[[rep:SystemUser]]: Mandatory property rep:principalName not found in a new node

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Dec 25, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label Dec 25, 2020
davidjgonzalez pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 22, 2021
* #2451 - Adding a new dispatcher cache control header filter based on the resource type of the page

Co-authored-by: Maria Hada <maria.hada@kbc.be>
Co-authored-by: Roy Teeuwen <roy.teeuwen@kbc.be>
@kwin kwin removed the wontfix label Mar 3, 2021
@kwin kwin added this to the 4.12.0 milestone Mar 3, 2021
@kwin kwin closed this as completed Mar 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants