Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dns rewrite checkbox #3782

Open
c2xusnpq6 opened this issue Oct 30, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

dns rewrite checkbox #3782

c2xusnpq6 opened this issue Oct 30, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@c2xusnpq6
Copy link

Whenever I want to test something, I have to remove the filter rule and add it again.

image

@ainar-g
Copy link
Contributor

ainar-g commented Nov 1, 2021

Hello. Most users are encouraged to move their DNS rewrites to the more powerful and generalised dnsrewrite rules. See #2499. Since those are basically just custom rules, you can simply comment them out when you want to check something.

I'll leave this issue open in case we want to retain the UI in the new design (#2554).

@fvdm
Copy link
Contributor

fvdm commented Nov 3, 2021

@ainar-g While custom rules allow more advanced use they are less user friendly. Especially when the list gets long it becomes difficult to maintain and prone to mistakes. The rule you want to modify can be anywhere in the list.

The table view makes it all super easy, including on smartphones. I was hoping that was going to be extended to the other rule types rather than being removed.

@c2xusnpq6
Copy link
Author

@ainar-g While custom rules allow more advanced use they are less user friendly. Especially when the list gets long it becomes difficult to maintain and prone to mistakes. The rule you want to modify can be anywhere in the list.

The table view makes it all super easy, including on smartphones. I was hoping that was going to be extended to the other rule types rather than being removed.

Just like the Windows version. 😃👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants