Skip to content

🚨 [security] Update semantic-release 17.4.7 → 24.2.8 (major) #584

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

🚨 [security] Update semantic-release 17.4.7 → 24.2.8 (major) #584

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

depfu[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented Sep 17, 2025

🚨 Your current dependencies have known security vulnerabilities 🚨

This dependency update fixes known security vulnerabilities. Please see the details below and assess their impact carefully. We recommend to merge and deploy this as soon as possible!

Here is everything you need to know about this upgrade. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ semantic-release (17.4.7 → 24.2.8) · Repo

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in semantic-release

Impact

What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?

Secrets that would normally be masked by semantic-release can be accidentally disclosed if they contain characters that are excluded from uri encoding by encodeURI. Occurrence is further limited to execution contexts where push access to the related repository is not available without modifying the repository url to inject credentials.

Patches

Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?

Fixed in 19.0.3

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

Secrets that do not contain characters that are excluded from encoding with encodeURI when included in a URL are already masked properly.

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Release Notes

Too many releases to show here. View the full release notes.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 43 commits:

Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu cancel merge
Cancels automatic merging of this PR
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label Sep 17, 2025
@depfu depfu bot mentioned this pull request Sep 17, 2025
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
depfu
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
0 participants