Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Cypress targets #11542

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 7, 2019
Merged

Update Cypress targets #11542

merged 6 commits into from
Oct 7, 2019

Conversation

morser499
Copy link

Description

Minor updates to Cypress targets:
Simplify BSP contents
Clean up BSP hardware configuration
Refactor serial flash support
Update CY8CPROTO-064-SB linker scripts
Avoid doubly allocating whd thread stack
Consolidate/clean up wifi initialization

Pull request type

[ ] Fix
[ ] Refactor
[x ] Target update
[ ] Functionality change
[ ] Docs update
[ ] Test update
[ ] Breaking change

Kyle Kearney added 6 commits September 19, 2019 11:05
Don't malloc during wifi initialization, as that could cause double allocation in some cases.
The thread stack will be allocated by cy_rtos_thread_start if necessary.
Remove some (Cypress-proprietary) BSP interfaces and hardware initialization
from the BSPs which is better implemented by a library or application firmware.
Move some remaining functionality from common to the individual targets.
Update linker scripts for the latest PDL to be consistent with other Cypress targets
- Improve block naming
- Remove unneeded items
@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested review from maclobdell and a team September 20, 2019 21:00
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

@morser499, thank you for your changes.
@maclobdell @ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

@adbridge
Copy link
Contributor

adbridge commented Oct 3, 2019

CI started

@adbridge
Copy link
Contributor

adbridge commented Oct 7, 2019

Restarting CI

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Oct 7, 2019

Test run: SUCCESS

Summary: 11 of 11 test jobs passed
Build number : 2
Build artifacts

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants