Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for extended particle range to the Fortran interfaces #1331

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 3, 2020

Conversation

atmyers
Copy link
Member

@atmyers atmyers commented Sep 2, 2020

The proposed changes:

  • fix a bug or incorrect behavior in AMReX
  • add new capabilities to AMReX
  • changes answers in the test suite to more than roundoff level
  • are likely to significantly affect the results of downstream AMReX users
  • are described in the proposed changes to the AMReX documentation, if appropriate

@atmyers atmyers requested a review from WeiqunZhang September 2, 2020 22:54
@@ -56,15 +58,43 @@ end subroutine amrex_fi_delete_particlecontainer
subroutine amrex_fi_get_next_particle_id (id) bind(c)
import
implicit none
integer(c_int) id
integer(c_long) id
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should use amrex_long from the amrex_fort_module.

@atmyers atmyers merged commit c7cef05 into AMReX-Codes:development Sep 3, 2020
kweide pushed a commit to ECP-Astro/amrex that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2020
…ReX-Codes#1331)

* add support for extended particle range to the Fortran interfaces

* replace c_long -> amrex_long for Windows support
kweide added a commit to ECP-Astro/amrex that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2020
dwillcox pushed a commit to dwillcox/amrex that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2020
…ReX-Codes#1331)

* add support for extended particle range to the Fortran interfaces

* replace c_long -> amrex_long for Windows support
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants