Repository navigation
docs(execsurface): disclose historic independent static review with limits - #186
Merged
aetherxeg-source merged 1 commit intoOct 8, 2026
Merged
Conversation
… narrow trust bounds
aetherxeg-source
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 8, 2026 22:03
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Scope — historical review, not product endorsement
Add a concise link to the independent third-party static review that placed ExecSurface Alpha on awesome-ai-security-tools WATCHLIST. The source reviewer specifically said no project commands were run and raised concerns about observed-command effects occurring before BLOCK, evidence-artifact sensitivity and opt-in REVIEW failure. These negative/neutral findings remain prominently stated.
Explicit exclusions: no independent runtime validation, stable-v1 review, third-party adoption, security audit, endorsement, logo license or partnership is claimed. Do not contact reviewer or request retrospective upgrade. Fix three existing stale v1 README fragments including org-profile link anchor.
Review roles / gates: innovation = concise useful credibility evidence; anti-drift = Alpha/static != stable/runtime; independent falsifier = exact reviewer text and watchlist entry; critical reviewer = no loss of counterevidence, exact PR-head CI success, no released code or tags changed.