Skip to content

Conversation

@shapkarin
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes issue #60

Changes: Define propTypes with type in propNames input (prop:type or prop:type*)

@shapkarin shapkarin changed the title Issue 60 Define propTypes in propNames input Jan 9, 2019
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@shapkarin shapkarin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I found a way

@shapkarin shapkarin changed the title Define propTypes in propNames input Define propTypes in propNames input (prop:type or prop:type*) Jan 11, 2019
@shapkarin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@rajikaimal I refact that feature, now it's more readable than at first commit. Hope you'll find time to look :octocat:

@rajikaimal
Copy link
Contributor

Great work! @shapkarin

@rajikaimal rajikaimal merged commit b502121 into 99x:master Jan 14, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants