Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

map maker function should be able to accept a trained model as input then map the predicted values or uncertainty values #7

Closed
mnky9800n opened this issue Apr 25, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

map maker function should be able to accept a trained model as input then map the predicted values or uncertainty values #7

mnky9800n opened this issue Apr 25, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
@gareth-j
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone
v0.0.3

Comments

@mnky9800n
Copy link
Contributor

One way to check whether a model is producing reasonable results is to look at the spatial distribution of predicted results (or uncertainties) and see if they align with the data being modeled. It would be very nice if the model could accept, in addition to raster, points, and other kinds of data, a trained model that then auto-generates the predicted output for the map and then maps it.
@mnky9800n mnky9800n added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 25, 2023
@gareth-j
Copy link
Contributor

I think this needs discussing and a chunk of work so I'm going to reassign this to the next milestone.

@gareth-j
Copy link
Contributor

Closing as duplicate of #111

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@gareth-j gareth-j

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v0.0.3
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@mnky9800n @gareth-j