Django model mixins and utilities.
Install from PyPI with pip:
pip install django-model-utils
or get the in-development version:
pip install django-model-utils==tip
To use django-model-utils in your Django project, just import and
use the utility classes described below; there is no need to modify
your INSTALLED_APPS setting.
Most of django-model-utils works with Django 1.1 or later.
InheritanceManager and SplitField require Django 1.2 or later.
Choices provides some conveniences for setting choices on a Django model field:
from model_utils import Choices
class Article(models.Model):
STATUS = Choices('draft', 'published')
# ...
status = models.CharField(choices=STATUS, default=STATUS.draft, max_length=20)
A Choices object is initialized with any number of choices. In the
simplest case, each choice is a string; that string will be used both
as the database representation of the choice, and the human-readable
representation. Note that you can access options as attributes on the
Choices object: STATUS.draft.
But you may want your human-readable versions translated, in which case you need to separate the human-readable version from the DB representation. In this case you can provide choices as two-tuples:
from model_utils import Choices
class Article(models.Model):
STATUS = Choices(('draft', _('draft')), ('published', _('published')))
# ...
status = models.CharField(choices=STATUS, default=STATUS.draft, max_length=20)
But what if your database representation of choices is constrained in
a way that would hinder readability of your code? For instance, you
may need to use an IntegerField rather than a CharField, or
you may want the database to order the values in your field in some
specific way. In this case, you can provide your choices as triples,
where the first element is the database representation, the second is
a valid Python identifier you will use in your code as a constant, and
the third is the human-readable version:
from model_utils import Choices
class Article(models.Model):
STATUS = Choices((0, 'draft', _('draft')), (1, 'published', _('published')))
# ...
status = models.IntegerField(choices=STATUS, default=STATUS.draft)
A simple convenience for giving a model a set of "states."
StatusField is a CharField subclass that expects to find a
STATUS class attribute on its model, and uses that as its
choices. Also sets a default max_length of 100, and sets its
default value to the first item in the STATUS choices:
from model_utils.fields import StatusField
from model_utils import Choices
class Article(models.Model):
STATUS = Choices('draft', 'published')
# ...
status = StatusField()
(The STATUS class attribute does not have to be a Choices
instance, it can be an ordinary list of two-tuples).
A DateTimeField subclass that monitors another field on the model,
and updates itself to the current date-time whenever the monitored
field changes:
from model_utils.fields import MonitorField, StatusField
class Article(models.Model):
STATUS = Choices('draft', 'published')
status = StatusField()
status_changed = MonitorField(monitor='status')
(A MonitorField can monitor any type of field for changes, not only a
StatusField.)
A TextField subclass that automatically pulls an excerpt out of
its content (based on a "split here" marker or a default number of
initial paragraphs) and stores both its content and excerpt values in
the database.
A SplitField is easy to add to any model definition:
from django.db import models
from model_utils.fields import SplitField
class Article(models.Model):
title = models.CharField(max_length=100)
body = SplitField()
SplitField automatically creates an extra non-editable field
_body_excerpt to store the excerpt. This field doesn't need to be
accessed directly; see below.
When accessing an attribute of a model that was declared as a
SplitField, a SplitText object is returned. The SplitText
object has three attributes:
content:- The full field contents.
excerpt:- The excerpt of
content(read-only). has_more:- True if the excerpt and content are the same, False otherwise.
This object also has a __unicode__ method that returns the full
content, allowing SplitField attributes to appear in templates
without having to access content directly.
Assuming the Article model above:
>>> a = Article.objects.all()[0] >>> a.body.content u'some text\n\n<!-- split -->\n\nmore text' >>> a.body.excerpt u'some text\n' >>> unicode(a.body) u'some text\n\n<!-- split -->\n\nmore text'
Assignment to a.body is equivalent to assignment to
a.body.content.
Note
a.body.excerpt is only updated when a.save() is called
By default, SplitField looks for the marker <!-- split -->
alone on a line and takes everything before that marker as the
excerpt. This marker can be customized by setting the SPLIT_MARKER
setting.
If no marker is found in the content, the first two paragraphs (where
paragraphs are blocks of text separated by a blank line) are taken to
be the excerpt. This number can be customized by setting the
SPLIT_DEFAULT_PARAGRAPHS setting.
An abstract base class for any model that expresses a time-range. Adds
start and end nullable DateTimeFields, and a timeframed
manager that returns only objects for whom the current date-time lies
within their time range.
Pulls together StatusField, MonitorField and QueryManager into an abstract base class for any model with a "status."
Just provide a STATUS class-attribute (a Choices object or a
list of two-tuples), and your model will have a status field with
those choices, a status_changed field containing the date-time the
status was last changed, and a manager for each status that
returns objects with that status only:
from model_utils.models import StatusModel
from model_utils import Choices
class Article(StatusModel):
STATUS = Choices('draft', 'published')
# ...
a = Article()
a.status = Article.STATUS.published
# this save will update a.status_changed
a.save()
# this query will only return published articles:
Article.published.all()
This manager (contributed by Jeff Elmore) should be attached to a base model class in a model-inheritance tree. It allows queries on that base model to return heterogenous results of the actual proper subtypes, without any additional queries.
For instance, if you have a Place model with subclasses Restaurant and
Bar, you may want to query all Places:
nearby_places = Place.objects.filter(location='here')
But when you iterate over nearby_places, you'll get only Place
instances back, even for objects that are "really" Restaurant or Bar.
If you attach an InheritanceManager to Place, you can just call the
select_subclasses() method on the InheritanceManager or any
QuerySet from it, and the resulting objects will be instances of
Restaurant or Bar:
from model_utils.managers import InheritanceManager
class Place(models.Model):
# ...
objects = InheritanceManager()
class Restaurant(Place):
# ...
class Bar(Place):
# ...
nearby_places = Place.objects.filter(location='here').select_subclasses()
for place in nearby_places:
# "place" will automatically be an instance of Place, Restaurant, or Bar
The database query performed will have an extra join for each subclass; if you
want to reduce the number of joins and you only need particular subclasses to
be returned as their actual type, you can pass subclass names to
select_subclasses(), much like the built-in select_related() method:
nearby_places = Place.objects.select_subclasses("restaurant")
# restaurants will be Restaurant instances, bars will still be Place instances
InheritanceManager also provides a subclass-fetching alternative to the
get() method:
place = Place.objects.get_subclass(id=some_id) # "place" will automatically be an instance of Place, Restaurant, or Bar
If you don't explicitly call select_subclasses() or get_subclass(),
an InheritanceManager behaves identically to a normal Manager; so
it's safe to use as your default manager for the model.
Note
InheritanceManager currently only supports a single level of model
inheritance; it won't work for grandchild models.
Note
The implementation of InheritanceManager uses select_related
internally. Due to Django bug #16855, this currently means that it
will override any previous select_related calls on the QuerySet.
Note
InheritanceManager requires Django 1.2 or later. Previous versions of
django-model-utils included InheritanceCastModel, an alternative (and
inferior) approach to this problem that is Django 1.1
compatible. InheritanceCastModel will remain in django-model-utils
until support for Django 1.1 is removed, but it is no longer documented and
its use in new code is discouraged.
This abstract base class just provides self-updating created and
modified fields on any model that inherits from it.
Many custom model managers do nothing more than return a QuerySet that
is filtered in some way. QueryManager allows you to express this
pattern with a minimum of boilerplate:
from django.db import models
from model_utils.managers import QueryManager
class Post(models.Model):
...
published = models.BooleanField()
pub_date = models.DateField()
...
objects = models.Manager()
public = QueryManager(published=True).order_by('-pub_date')
The kwargs passed to QueryManager will be passed as-is to the
QuerySet.filter() method. You can also pass a Q object to
QueryManager to express more complex conditions. Note that you can
set the ordering of the QuerySet returned by the QueryManager
by chaining a call to .order_by() on the QueryManager (this is
not required).
A common "gotcha" when defining methods on a custom manager class is that those
same methods are not automatically also available on the QuerySets returned by
that manager, so are not "chainable". This can be counterintuitive, as most of
the public QuerySet API is mirrored on managers. It is possible to create a
custom Manager that returns QuerySets that have the same additional methods,
but this requires boilerplate code. The PassThroughManager class
(contributed by Paul McLanahan) removes this boilerplate.
To use PassThroughManager, rather than defining a custom manager with
additional methods, define a custom QuerySet subclass with the additional
methods you want, and pass that QuerySet subclass to the
PassThroughManager.for_queryset_class() class method. The returned
PassThroughManager subclass will always return instances of your custom
QuerySet, and you can also call methods of your custom QuerySet
directly on the manager:
from datetime import datetime
from django.db import models
from django.db.models.query import QuerySet
from model_utils.managers import PassThroughManager
class PostQuerySet(QuerySet):
def by_author(self, user):
return self.filter(user=user)
def published(self):
return self.filter(published__lte=datetime.now())
def unpublished(self):
return self.filter(published__gte=datetime.now())
class Post(models.Model):
user = models.ForeignKey(User)
published = models.DateTimeField()
objects = PassThroughManager.for_queryset_class(PostQuerySet)()
Post.objects.published()
Post.objects.by_author(user=request.user).unpublished()
Note
Previous versions of django-model-utils included manager_from, a
function that solved the same problem as PassThroughManager. The
manager_from approach created dynamic QuerySet subclasses on the
fly, which broke pickling of those querysets. For this reason,
PassThroughManager is recommended instead.
Ticket #3182 in Django's bug tracker suggests
an update_or_create() method for managers and querysets.
The method works in a similar way as get_or_create(),
but in addition to returning an object if it's found in the database,
it updates the object's fields according to the defaults keyword argument.
Use this mixin in a custom QuerySet subclass, and create a corresponding
manager with PassThroughManager:
from datetime import datetime
from django.db import models
from django.db.models.query import QuerySet
from model_utils.managers import UpdateOrCreateMixin
class PostQuerySet(QuerySet, UpdateOrCreateMixin):
pass
class Post(models.Model):
user = models.ForeignKey(User)
published = models.DateTimeField()
objects = PassThroughManager.for_queryset_class(PostQuerySet)()
Post.objects.update_or_create(user=request.user,
defaults={'published': datetime.now()})