fix: After modifying the application name and publishing it, the appl…

[wangdan-fit2cloud]

…ication name on the layout page was not updated(#2799)

What this PR does / why we need it?

Summary of your change

Please indicate you've done the following:

• Made sure tests are passing and test coverage is added if needed.
• Made sure commit message follow the rule of Conventional Commits specification.
• Considered the docs impact and opened a new docs issue or PR with docs changes if needed.

[f2c-ci-robot]

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[f2c-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[shaohuzhang1]

There appear to be a few potential issues and areas for improvement in the provided code:

1. Use of loading param: The application.asyncPutApplication method is being called with an extra parameter loading, which might not be necessary if you're handling loading state separately.

2. Handling errors after put operation fails: It doesn't seem like there are any error handling mechanisms in place following the putPublishApplication call. This could lead to unhandled exceptions if something goes wrong during this step.

3. Suggested modifications:

   • Remove unnecessary loading parameter from asyncPutApplication.
   • Add specific error handling for both async operations.
   • Ensure proper formatting consistency throughout the code.

Here's a revised version with these improvements:

async function publicHandle() {
  const obj = {
    work_flow: getGraphData()
  };
  
  await application.asyncPutApplication(id, obj);
  
  const workflow = new WorkFlowInstance(obj.work_flow);
  try {
    workflow.is_valid();
    
    // Assuming you have access to a message service (MsgSuccess, t)
    MsgSuccess(t('views.applicationWorkflow.tip.publicSuccess'));
    
    // Call getDetail() here if needed or ensure it's properly defined elsewhere
    getDetail?.(); // Safe navigation operator
    
    // Continue handling publishApplication asynchronously if needed
    applicationApi.putPublishApplication(id as string, obj). catch((err) => {
      console.error("Failed to publish application:", err); // Log errors for debugging
      
      // Handle more granularly based on error type
      switch (err.message) {
        case "Validation Error":
          // Show validation error UI or handle differently
          break;
        default:
          Alert.warning("An unexpected error occurred!");
      }
      
      // Optionally inform user via message or another means
      MsgError(t('common.err.commonMessage'));
    });
  } catch (error) {
    console.error("Work flow instance initialization failed:", error);

    // Provide feedback to the user
    MsgWarning(t('app.workflow.workflowInitFail', { workflow_id }));
  }
}

Key Changes Applied:

• Removed the loading parameter from asyncPutApplication.
• Added error handling following the putPublishApplication call.
• Used safe navigation (?.() ) for optional methods (getDetail) to avoid null/undefined pointer issues.
• Enhanced logging for better debug information.
• Provided a basic way to handle different types of errors that might occur during the sequence of operations.