Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Opening statement shortcuts can only handle one issue #2186

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: Opening statement shortcuts can only handle one issue

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Feb 10, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit d4fbf09 into main Feb 10, 2025
4 checks passed
@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@main@fix_quick_question branch February 10, 2025 02:24
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ const prologue = computed(() => {
let result = temp
for (const index in quick_question_list) {
const quick_question = quick_question_list[index]
result = temp.replace(quick_question, toQuickQuestion)
result = result.replace(quick_question, toQuickQuestion)
}
return result
}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The function you provided looks mostly correct and should work efficiently. Here's a couple of minor improvements:

  1. Use Array.prototype.includes Instead: This can make your loop more concise and potentially faster if there are many common values in quick_question_list.
for (const index in quick_question_list) {
  const quick_question = quick_question_list[index];
  if (!toQuickQuestion[quick_question]) continue; // Only replace existing keys

  result = result.replace(quick_question, toQuickQuestion);
}
  1. Error Handling: Consider adding error handling, particularly checking if either temp, quick_question_list, or toQuickQuestion is undefined.

  2. Performance: If toQuickQuestion becomes very large, creating new strings with each replacement might be inefficient. You could instead use a regular expression to construct the final string all at once.

function toFinalText(template) {
  return template.split(RegExp(
    quick_question_list.map(qq => qq.escapeForRegex()).join('|')
  )).map(text => text || '').join('');
}

// In your setupComputed method
let final_text_temp;
computed(() => {
  final_text_temp = [...quick_question_list].reduce((accumulator, key) => ({
    ...accumulator,
    [key]: 'replace_this_with_suggested_value' // Replace with actual default value
  }), {});

  return toFinalText(template);
});

This approach creates an object final_text_temp initialized with placeholders (replace_this_with_suggested_value) for each key in quick_question_list. The RegExp then uses these keys to split the template and join them using empty strings when no match is found (''). After constructing this, it iterates over the keys again to perform replacements.

These suggestions aim to enhance readability and performance while maintaining correct functionality for most scenarios.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant