Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: refine translation #2165

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2025
Merged

fix: refine translation #2165

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2025

Conversation

shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: refine translation

@@ -602,7 +598,7 @@
<h5 class="p-8-12">
{{
item.type == WorkflowType.Application
? $t('chat.executionDetails.paramOutput')
? $t('common.param.outputParam')
: $t('chat.executionDetails.answer')
}}
</h5>
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code snippet appears to be modifying some text translations within an application using the vue-i18n framework. Here are the findings:

Irregularities and Potential Issues:

  1. Duplicate Translations: Many sections use the same translation keys (paramInput, paramOutput) but with slightly different contexts or conditions. This could lead to inconsistencies in terminology.

    • Examples:
      {{ $t('chat.executionDetails.paramInput') }}

    should match:

    {{ $t('common.param.inputParam') }}
  2. Conditional Translation Logic:

    • Some conditional logic checks if item.type is specific types (e.g., Application, DocumentExtractNode) before translating. Ensure that this logic aligns with expectations and does not duplicate existing translations.
  3. Dynamic Template Usage:

    • Dynamic usage of templates such as <template v-if="...">...</template> can make the code harder to read and debug. Consider restructuring these template blocks for better clarity and maintainability.

Optimization Suggestions:

  1. Consistent Use of Translation Keys:

    • Replace all translations where applicable to ensure consistency across your interface. For example, replace:
      {{ $t('chat.executionDetails.paramInput') }}

    with:

    {{ $t('common.param.inputParam') }}
  2. Refactor Conditional Blocks:

    • If you have repeated similar conditional checks, consider refactoring them into reusable functions to improve readability and maintainability.
  3. Simplify Templates Where Possible:

    • Avoid overly complex template structures where simpler alternatives would suffice. For instance:
      <div class="card-never border-r-4">
        <h5 class="p-8-12 flex align-center">
          <span class="mr-4">{{ $t('chat.executionDetails.paramOutput') }}</span>
            <el-tooltip
              effect="dark"

@@ -602,7 +598,7 @@



{{ $t('chat.executionDetails.paramInput') }}


      Simplify to:
      
```html
<div class="card-never border-r-4">
  <h5 class="p-8-12 flex align-center">{{ $t('common.param.inputParam') }}</h5>
</div>

<div class="card-never border-r-4">
  <h5 class="p-8-12 flex align-center">{{ $t('chat.executionDetails.paramOutput') }}</h5>
</div>

Summary

Improvements:

  • Consistent use of translation keys.
  • Refactoring complex conditional checks.
  • Simplifying template structures wherever practical.

Next Steps:

  • Review other parts of your app for unnecessary repetition and maintainability improvements based on these insights.

This analysis should help guide any further optimizations or adjustments needed in your codebase. Let me know if there's anything else I can assist with!

@@ -207,7 +214,7 @@ export default {
imageGenerateNode: {
label: 'Image Generation',
text: 'Generate images based on provided text content',
answer: 'AI Answer Content',
answer: 'AI Content',
model: {
label: 'Image Generation Model',
requiredMessage: 'Please select an image generation model'
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code appears to be correctly formatted and contains no syntax errors. However, there is one instance of "Answer" being used instead of "CONTENT," which might indicate confusion when referring to the answer generated by the AI models.

Suggestion:
Update all occurrences of "answer" with "content." This should maintain consistency in terminology while maintaining clarity.

v-else
v-model="item.value"
:placeholder="$t('views.functionLib.functionForm.form.param.inputPlaceholder')"
/>
</el-form-item>
</template>
</div>
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are no immediate issues with the provided C++ code snippet you've shared. If you have specific questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!

@wangdan-fit2cloud wangdan-fit2cloud merged commit 6c6821d into main Feb 8, 2025
4 checks passed
@wangdan-fit2cloud wangdan-fit2cloud deleted the pr@main@translation branch February 8, 2025 09:30
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Feb 8, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Feb 8, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants