using lumi package

how to get the expression profile matrix and what't the correct group
information

9-microarray-examples/illuminaHGv4/GSE30669_DEG.R

@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+rm(list=ls())
+library(lumi)
+studyID = 'GSE30669'
+setwd('G:/array/GSE30669')
+# ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/series/GSE30nnn/GSE30669/suppl/GSE30669_HEK_Sample_Probe_Profile.txt.gz
+fileName <- 'GSE30669_HEK_Sample_Probe_Profile.txt'  
+x.lumi <- lumiR.batch(fileName) ##, sampleInfoFile='sampleInfo.txt')
+## it make me so sad that I can't find the sampleInfo.txt
+pData(phenoData(x.lumi))  
+
+## Do all the default preprocessing in one step
+lumi.N.Q <- lumiExpresso(x.lumi) 
+### retrieve normalized data
+dataMatrix <- exprs(lumi.N.Q)
+##　To speed up the processing and reduce false positives, remove the unexpressed　and un-annotated genes
+presentCount <- detectionCall(x.lumi)
+selectDataMatrix <- dataMatrix[presentCount > 0,]
+probe2target=pData(featureData(x.lumi)) 
+## estimate the detect call (percentage of expressed genes) of each sample
+temp <- detectionCall(x.lumi, type='sample')
+print(temp)
+## estimate the present count of each gene (probe)
+temp <- detectionCall(x.lumi, type='probe')
+hist(temp)
+
+## QC, sampleRelation.png is especially important.
+QClumi <- function(example.lumi){
+  width <- 800;height <- 800;
+  summary(example.lumi, 'QC')
+  png('1_density.png',width = width, height = height)
+  plot(example.lumi, what='density')	## plot the density
+  dev.off()
+  png('2_cdf.png',width = width, height = height)
+  plotCDF(example.lumi) 
+  dev.off()
+  png('3_pairwise.png',width = width*2, height = height*2)
+  plot(example.lumi, what='pair')		## pairwise plots
+  #plot(example.lumi, what='pair', smoothScatter=T)
+  dev.off()
+  png('4_pairwiseMAplot.png',width = width*2, height = height*2)
+  plot(example.lumi, what='MAplot')	
+  #plot(example.lumi, what='MAplot', smoothScatter=T)	
+  dev.off()
+  png('5_density_plot_of_coefficient_of_varience.png',width = width, height = height)
+  plot(example.lumi, what='cv')
+  dev.off()
+  png('6_sampleRelation.png',width = width, height = height)
+  plot(example.lumi, what='sampleRelation')
+  dev.off()
+  png('7_MDS.png',width = width, height = height)
+  plot(example.lumi, what='sampleRelation', method='mds' )
+  dev.off()
+}
+QClumi(x.lumi)
+
+
+# library(GEOquery)
+# library(limma)
+# GSE30669 <- getGEO('GSE30669', destdir='.',getGPL = F)
+# exprSet=exprs(GSE30669[[1]])
+# GSE30669[[1]]
+# pdata=pData(GSE30669[[1]])
+# exprSet=exprs(GSE30669[[1]])
+
+
+###################################################
+### code chunk number 31: Identify differentially expressed genes
+###################################################
+## Specify the sample type
+# It's wrorng to just arrange them in order. 
+# sampleType <- factor(c(rep('PMN',3),rep('PDK1',3),rep('MYC',3),rep('E545K',3)))
+# limmaArg='PDK1-PMN,MYC-PMN,E545K-PMN'
+sampleType <- factor( c('G1','G4','G3','G2','G1','G4','G3','G2','G1','G2','G3','G4' )  )
+limmaArg='G2-G1,G3-G1,G4-G1,G4-G2,G3-G2,G4-G3'
+## we should check the sampleRelation.png to group them properly, but we could just give them a anonymous label.
+if (require(limma)) { 
+  design <- model.matrix(~0+  sampleType )
+  colnames(design) <-  levels(sampleType)
+  fit <- lmFit(selectDataMatrix, design) 
+
+  contrastsCommand=unlist(strsplit(limmaArg, split=","))
+  cont.matrix <- makeContrasts(contrasts=contrastsCommand, levels=design)
+  fit2=contrasts.fit(fit,cont.matrix)
+  fit2=eBayes(fit2)
+  options(digits = 4) 
+  for(i in 1:length(contrastsCommand)){
+    tempOutFile <- paste(studyID,".diffexp.", contrastsCommand[i],".csv", sep="")
+    tempOutput = topTable(fit2, coef=i, n=Inf)
+    tempOutput = na.omit(tempOutput)
+    #### change probeID to geneSymbol according to the probe2target  !!!
+    tempOutput$geneSymbol=probe2target[match(rownames(tempOutput),probe2target[,1]),2] 
+    write.csv(tempOutput,tempOutFile,quote=FALSE,row.names = F)
+  }
+} 
+
+## Significant analysis of microarray identified 1,750, 1,080, and 297 differentially expressed genes 
+## in these transformed cells when compared with nontransformed control cells, respectively 
+##  false discovery rate < 0.05; P < 0.01; 
+
+for(i in 1:length(contrastsCommand)){ 
+  tempOutput = topTable(fit2, coef=i, n=Inf) 
+  print(nrow(tempOutput[tempOutput$adj.P.Val<0.05,]))
+}
+
+