Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate any interface property duplication #1946

Open
zFernand0 opened this issue May 20, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Deprecate any interface property duplication #1946

zFernand0 opened this issue May 20, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority-low Legit issue but cosmetic or nice-to-have v4 Prospective changes for v4

Comments

@zFernand0
Copy link
Member

Disclaimer: I can see that the precedent was already set, and I would not change your implementation at this time.

However, since commandParameters.arguments are already included in the createParms variable, does commandParameters.arguments.disableDefaults need to be passed in separately? Again, don't change it. I was just interested in your thoughts.

Originally posted by @gejohnston in https://github.com/zowe/imperative/pull/401/files

@zFernand0 zFernand0 added enhancement New feature or request release-major Indicates a major breaking change will be introduced priority-low Legit issue but cosmetic or nice-to-have labels Nov 17, 2022
@zFernand0 zFernand0 added the v3 prospective changes for v3 label Mar 21, 2023
@zFernand0 zFernand0 added this to the Zowe V3 milestone Apr 25, 2023
@awharn awharn transferred this issue from zowe/imperative Nov 13, 2023
@JTonda JTonda added v4 Prospective changes for v4 and removed release-major Indicates a major breaking change will be introduced v3 prospective changes for v3 labels Feb 14, 2024
@adam-wolfe adam-wolfe removed this from the Zowe V3 milestone Feb 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority-low Legit issue but cosmetic or nice-to-have v4 Prospective changes for v4
Projects
Status: Low Priority
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants