You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Finalized CCTX can exist in three states OutboundMined : Can be removed Reverted : can be removed Aborted : we support refunding a aborted TX , these should not be removed
Considering the above information, we should remove CCTXs finalized from our state.
Not sure about this one tbh. CCTXs are the pillar of ZetaChain, would make sense to me to keep indexed and keep a tamperproof and uncensorable way to fetch these through node even if it brings more overhead on state.
Cleaning ballots are different for example, as used more internally in the protocol.
If we just need the information regarding the cctx , we can add as much as we need to an event which is stored as part of the tx result. @gartnera We can use the events for indexing as as well.
Keeping long-lived data as part of events might be beneficial because some nodes can choose not to store it by just setting tx_index to null , or even setting it to psql for richer searching.
Keeping it in application storage mandates every node to store it.
With that said , the CCTX data does not seem to be an immediate concern , and can be added to the backlog for now
Finalized CCTX can exist in three states
OutboundMined
: Can be removedReverted
: can be removedAborted
: we support refunding a aborted TX , these should not be removedConsidering the above information, we should remove CCTXs finalized from our state.
We keep track of finalized inbounds separately, so this would not affect the security of the system, making sure already processed cctxs cannot be submitted again.
https://github.com/zeta-chain/zeta-node/blob/c3d19297b4d345e9d7ff746f510a0e3e25eb6355/x/crosschain/keeper/msg_server_vote_inbound_tx.go#L121-L124
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: