ci: check_compliance is broken if run it inside the zephyr\scripts\ci directory

[butok]

Describe the bug

check_compliance.py is broken if run it inside the zephyr\scripts\ci directory on Windows

To Reproduce

Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Go to the zephyr\scripts\ci directory
2. Run in command line: python check_compliance.py
3. The KeepSorted test module raises a Python exception.

Expected behavior

No Python exceptions.

Impact
It is not possible to run the compliance tests in the zephyr\scripts\ci directory on Windows.

Logs and console output

C:\_ddm\ZEPHYR\review\butok_gh_3\zephyr\scripts\ci>python check_compliance.py
Running Identity         tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...
Running GitDiffCheck     tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...
Running KconfigHWMv2     tests in C:\_ddm\ZEPHYR\review\butok_gh_3\zephyr ...
Running Kconfig          tests in C:\_ddm\ZEPHYR\review\butok_gh_3\zephyr ...
Running ClangFormat      tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...
Running Checkpatch       tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...
Running Gitlint          tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...
Running Pylint           tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...
Running ModulesMaintainers tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...
Running ImageSize        tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...
Running BinaryFiles      tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...
Running Nits             tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...
Running KconfigBasic     tests in C:\_ddm\ZEPHYR\review\butok_gh_3\zephyr ...
Running DevicetreeBindings tests in C:\_ddm\ZEPHYR\review\butok_gh_3\zephyr ...
Running BoardYml         tests in C:\_ddm\ZEPHYR\review\butok_gh_3\zephyr ...
Running KeepSorted       tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...
Python exception in `C:\_ddm\ZEPHYR\review\butok_gh_3\zephyr\scripts\ci\check_compliance.py`:


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\_ddm\ZEPHYR\review\butok_gh_3\zephyr\scripts\ci\check_compliance.py", line 1769, in main
    n_fails = _main(args)
              ^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "C:\_ddm\ZEPHYR\review\butok_gh_3\zephyr\scripts\ci\check_compliance.py", line 1704, in _main
    test.run()
  File "C:\_ddm\ZEPHYR\review\butok_gh_3\zephyr\scripts\ci\check_compliance.py", line 1548, in run
    with open(file, "r") as fp:
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'scripts/ci/coverage/coverage_analysis.py'

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\_ddm\ZEPHYR\review\butok_gh_3\zephyr\scripts\ci\check_compliance.py", line 1796, in <module>
    main(sys.argv[1:])
  File "C:\_ddm\ZEPHYR\review\butok_gh_3\zephyr\scripts\ci\check_compliance.py", line 1769, in main
    n_fails = _main(args)
              ^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "C:\_ddm\ZEPHYR\review\butok_gh_3\zephyr\scripts\ci\check_compliance.py", line 1704, in _main
    test.run()
  File "C:\_ddm\ZEPHYR\review\butok_gh_3\zephyr\scripts\ci\check_compliance.py", line 1548, in run
    with open(file, "r") as fp:
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'scripts/ci/coverage/coverage_analysis.py'

Environment (please complete the following information):

OS: Windows
SHA-1: 65051c8

Additional context
If to run it from the top directory, no errors:

C:\_ddm\ZEPHYR\review\butok_gh_3\zephyr>python ./scripts/ci/check_compliance.py
Running Nits             tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...
Running Gitlint          tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...
Running ClangFormat      tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...
Running MaintainersFormat tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...
Running KeepSorted       tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...
Running KconfigBasicNoModules tests in C:\_ddm\ZEPHYR\review\butok_gh_3\zephyr ...
Running KconfigBasic     tests in C:\_ddm\ZEPHYR\review\butok_gh_3\zephyr ...
Running Identity         tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...
Running ModulesMaintainers tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...
Running GitDiffCheck     tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...
Running DevicetreeBindings tests in C:\_ddm\ZEPHYR\review\butok_gh_3\zephyr ...
Running KconfigHWMv2     tests in C:\_ddm\ZEPHYR\review\butok_gh_3\zephyr ...
Running Checkpatch       tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...
Running Pylint           tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...
Running Kconfig          tests in C:\_ddm\ZEPHYR\review\butok_gh_3\zephyr ...
Running BoardYml         tests in C:\_ddm\ZEPHYR\review\butok_gh_3\zephyr ...
Running YAMLLint         tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...
Running ImageSize        tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...
Running BinaryFiles      tests in C:/_ddm/ZEPHYR/review/butok_gh_3/zephyr ...

Complete results in compliance.xml

[ttmut]

According to the documentation the correct way to use it is to run it from the top directory.

https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/contribute/guidelines.html#check-compliance-py

./scripts/ci/check_compliance.py -c upstream/main..

[butok]

According to the documentation the correct way to use it is to run it from the top directory.

https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/contribute/guidelines.html#check-compliance-py

./scripts/ci/check_compliance.py -c upstream/main..

Understand. However

• it does not claim that this is the only correct way.
• only the KeepSorted test module is problematic. All other modules handle this case correctly.

[henrikbrixandersen]

Understand. However

• it does not claim that this is the only correct way.
• only the KeepSorted test module is problematic. All other modules handle this case correctly.

So since this works as intended (when following the instructions), this is an enhancement, not a bug?

[butok]

Understand. However

• it does not claim that this is the only correct way.
• only the KeepSorted test module is problematic. All other modules handle this case correctly.

So since this works as intended (when following the instructions), this is an enhancement, not a bug?

OK. It can be marked as a place for improvement.