chore: more tests about delegate models for updateMany

[ymc9]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes update an integration test that verifies the nested updateMany operation. The test now creates a user internally with an added email field and adjusts the rated video creation by adding an explicit id along with modified duration and rating values. Additionally, the updateMany operations have been modified to use new filter criteria and to include an update without a filter, while ensuring that the video associated with a second user remains unaffected. In a related change, a unique, optional email field has been added to the User model in the utilities file.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
tests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-delegate/enhanced-client.test.ts	Modified the logic in the "update nested updateMany" test. The test now creates a user within the test (including an email field), explicitly assigns an id to ratedVideos, changes duration and rating values, updates the updateMany filter to use a new duration value (1), and adds an updateMany operation without a filter along with an assertion that the second user's video remains unchanged.
tests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-delegate/utils.ts	Added a new optional email field (String? @unique) to the User model within the POLYMORPHIC_SCHEMA, enabling each user to have a unique email if provided.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant T as Test Runner
    participant DB as Database

    T->>DB: Call setup() to acquire db instance
    T->>DB: Create first User with an email and explicit ratedVideos (with id, duration, and rating)
    T->>DB: Create second User with a different email and associated video data
    T->>DB: Execute updateMany operation filtering by duration=1
    DB-->>T: Return result of filtered updateMany
    T->>DB: Execute updateMany operation without a filter to adjust ratedVideos' duration
    DB-->>T: Return result of unfiltered updateMany
    T-->>T: Assert that the second user's video remains unchanged

Loading

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5224d56 and 8355998.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• tests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-delegate/enhanced-client.test.ts (1 hunks)
• tests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-delegate/utils.ts (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)

• GitHub Check: build-test (20.x)
• GitHub Check: OSSAR-Scan
• GitHub Check: build-test (20.x)
• GitHub Check: build-test (20.x)

🔇 Additional comments (6)

tests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-delegate/utils.ts (1)

4-4: LGTM! Email field addition looks good

Adding an optional unique email field to the User model is a clean enhancement that supports the updated tests.

tests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-delegate/enhanced-client.test.ts (5)

594-603: Test setup improvement looks good

The refactored setup now creates a user with email directly in the test, which utilizes the newly added email field. This approach gives more control over the test data creation.

---

605-613: Good addition of second test user

Creating a second user with a different email and video provides a proper way to verify that updates are properly isolated between users.

---

615-626: LGTM! Updated filter criteria

The test now performs updateMany with a specific filter criteria (duration: 1) which properly tests filtered updates on nested relations.

---

628-639: Good addition of updateMany without filter

This new test case validates that updateMany works without a filter condition, properly updating all related records. Using email to identify the user is a good use of the new field.

---

641-645: Important verification logic added

This assertion ensures that the second user's video remains unaffected by the updates, which is a critical test to verify proper isolation of the updateMany operations.

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.