WebTransport and RTMFP #22
Replies: 2 comments 6 replies
-
yes, it would be technically possible to adapt most of RTMFP to WebTransport. of course its P2P functions won't work that way, and there'd be little utility to RTMFP's startup handshake if a WebTransport session/connection is already established. and here i'm assuming you mean "WebTransport (QUIC)". and to get RTMFP's benefits, you'd probably want to use QUIC datagrams, not streams. and then RTMFP's congestion control would be fighting with QUIC's congestion control. if one were going to use TCP and target web browsers, i'd suggest using RTWebSocket instead, which gives you RTMFP's flow semantics but over a plain old websocket that any browser can already talk. note that |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm following webtransport repo (HTTP3) since 4 years now and what I can now is congestion can be dsiabled, as well as p2p can be done with it. it's still in active development, things can still change. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi Michael,
do you think it's technically possible to write the RTMFP protocol on top of webtransport?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions