Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[DocDB] Switch update consensus to lightweight protobufs #11893

Closed
rthallamko3 opened this issue Mar 25, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

[DocDB] Switch update consensus to lightweight protobufs #11893

rthallamko3 opened this issue Mar 25, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
@es1024
Labels
area/docdb YugabyteDB core features kind/enhancement This is an enhancement of an existing feature priority/medium Medium priority issue

Comments

@rthallamko3
Copy link
Contributor

rthallamko3 commented Mar 25, 2022 •
edited by yugabyte-ci
Loading

Jira Link: DB-943

Description

Switch update consensus to lightweight protobufs, this reduces a bunch of CPU around additional memory allocations/deallocations, memory copies etc.

To begin with the Write and UpdateTransaction scenarios of UpdateConsensus can be tackled first, as they account for 99% of the UpdateConsensus RPCs.

The fix in #11720 can be used as the template.
@rthallamko3 rthallamko3 added the area/docdb YugabyteDB core features label Mar 25, 2022
@yugabyte-ci yugabyte-ci added kind/bug This issue is a bug priority/medium Medium priority issue labels Jun 8, 2022
@yugabyte-ci yugabyte-ci added kind/enhancement This is an enhancement of an existing feature and removed kind/bug This issue is a bug labels Jul 28, 2022
@bmatican
Copy link
Contributor

Done as part of #13703

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@es1024 es1024

Labels
area/docdb YugabyteDB core features kind/enhancement This is an enhancement of an existing feature priority/medium Medium priority issue
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@bmatican @es1024 @rthallamko3 @yugabyte-ci