Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
20 lines (16 loc) · 1.34 KB

cloud-machine-types-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

20 lines (16 loc) · 1.34 KB

AWS

This is an analysis of the most cost-effective AWS machines to run YugabyteDB.

  • 3 nodes of 16 cores each with replication factor 3, fully cached workload can handle 100K reads and 20K writes. See this performance report for details.
  • 3 nodes of 8 cores each with replication factor 3, fully uncached workload with 1.4TB total can handle77K read ops/sec. See this post for more details.
  • The app needs between 1TB and 2TB of storage per node.
  • Analyzed many other machine types, concluded they are not as effective to run YugabyteDB
machine-type   vCPUs   memory    raw-cost    storage-cost      Total (1TB)    Total (2TB)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
c5.2xlarge      8      16GiB    $248/month   +$100/TB/month    $350/month     $450/month
c5.4xlarge      16     32GiB    $496/month   +$100/TB/month    $600/month     $700/month
i3.2xlarge      8      61GiB    $455/month   +$0 (1.9TB disk)  $455/month     $455/month (1.9TB local SSD)

Analytics