Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is the SMO 20 really supported? #41

Open
storeman opened this issue Oct 13, 2022 · 12 comments
Open

Is the SMO 20 really supported? #41

storeman opened this issue Oct 13, 2022 · 12 comments

Comments

@storeman
Copy link

So I'm trying to find if I can locally connect to my SMO 20 / F2120. It is mentioned on some places:

  • the yozik04/nibe repo
  • Home Assistant integration, which seems to use your list

If I dig in to the documentation, I go to the NibeGW docs. Here the SMO 20 is not listed anywhere.

I would really love to use the SMO 20 with an ESP/Arduino, but I think it is impossible. I can't find anything about any modbus or RS485 in the installer manual from the SMO 20 / F2120.

@elupus
Copy link
Collaborator

elupus commented Oct 14, 2022

Can you enable the modbus accessory if you enter the setup menu on the pump? If you can it should be possible to use. Otherwise it's likely not.

@storeman
Copy link
Author

The heat pump has no settings for MODBUS in the technical documentation and no connectors for this. Also, the control unit SMO 20 doesn't have any connectors or menu options. Should I create a PR to remove this from the code?

@elupus
Copy link
Collaborator

elupus commented Oct 14, 2022

Can you also check the actual menus of the pump?

Ps. I suspect one could hook up to same communication line that the smo connects to the actual pump.

@storeman
Copy link
Author

What do you mean by the "actual menus of the pump"? In my previous two posts I mentioned that I've looked through the menu of the SMO 20.

I've digged through the menus a couple of times and things about MODBUS or serial connection is not mentioned anywhere. If you have a suggestion where I could look, I'm happy to do so.

@elupus
Copy link
Collaborator

elupus commented Oct 14, 2022

You have opened up the service menu by holding down the back button for a few seconds (at least that is the common method) and got to the list of enabled accessories?

@storeman
Copy link
Author

Yes, that's where the good stuf is at :).

@elupus
Copy link
Collaborator

elupus commented Oct 14, 2022

Right, then we should remove it.

@yozik04
Copy link
Owner

yozik04 commented Oct 14, 2022

I do not agree with you. Why would nibe include smo20 in Modbus Manager if modbus would not be supported?

@yozik04
Copy link
Owner

yozik04 commented Oct 14, 2022

image

@storeman
Copy link
Author

That is curious. I very much hope to connect to it using Modbus, I see the SMO20 in the application too, I just downloaded it. But I really don't have a clue what and how to connect to it physically.

If I check the MODBUS40 accessory, the SMO20 is not mentioned. Just connecting something between the SMO20 and the F2120 doesn't make much sense, then they both would support it and would be choosable on the modbus manager. Also, why would the SMO40 need an extra accessory to support it.

I already spend a couple of hours researching. I just want to prevent people getting theirs hopes up or spending hours searching for something which is not possible.

@elupus
Copy link
Collaborator

elupus commented Oct 14, 2022

The connection btween pump and smo is a rs485 bus. It can be daisy chained with multiple devices. So fully possible to listen to data there. But i we cant enable the accessory, it wont send data needed to request parameters.

I agree, strange its in modbus manager. But could be a future proofing. The parameter sets are pretty much identical between pumps.

@yozik04
Copy link
Owner

yozik04 commented Oct 14, 2022

You can send a message directly to Nibe and ask them. They are quite responsive.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants