You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As I understood figure 5 in your paper, you further fine-tuned GPT-SelfInstruct on the SuperNatural Instructions data and surprisingly the results got worse compared to the "vanilla" GPT-SelfInstruct.
Is my understanding correct? If so, do you have any assumptions why a high-quality human annotated dataset as additional fine-tuning data worsened the overall performance?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As I understood figure 5 in your paper, you further fine-tuned GPT-SelfInstruct on the SuperNatural Instructions data and surprisingly the results got worse compared to the "vanilla" GPT-SelfInstruct.
Is my understanding correct? If so, do you have any assumptions why a high-quality human annotated dataset as additional fine-tuning data worsened the overall performance?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: