Skip to content

Introduce InitialAllocation option for storage load actor, KIKIMR-20619 #806

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

serbel324
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 29, 2023

Note

This is an automated comment that will be appended during run.

🔴 linux-x86_64-relwithdebinfo: some tests FAILED for commit 817ecac.

Test history

TESTS PASSED ERRORS FAILED SKIPPED MUTED?
59126 49917 0 18 9170 21

🔴 linux-x86_64-release-asan: some tests FAILED for commit 817ecac.

Test history

TESTS PASSED ERRORS FAILED SKIPPED MUTED?
15289 15133 0 24 113 19


std::unique_ptr<TEvBlobStorage::TEvCollectGarbage> ManageKeepFlags(ui64 tabletId, ui32 gen, ui32 step,
ui32 channel, bool keep) {
auto blobsWritten = std::make_unique<TVector<TLogoBlobID>>(ConfirmedBlobs);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

выглядит так, что ты по несколько раз будешь посылать keep флаги на одни и де же блобы?

может и ок, но что если там будут 1к-10к-100к блобов?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Этот метод вызывается один раз после того, как допишется последний блоб

@serbel324 serbel324 force-pushed the bs/load-test/initial-allocation branch 3 times, most recently from 37238ba to 1b64f94 Compare January 10, 2024 13:35
@serbel324 serbel324 force-pushed the bs/load-test/initial-allocation branch from 1b64f94 to 817ecac Compare January 10, 2024 14:30
@serbel324 serbel324 merged commit 5c82488 into ydb-platform:main Jan 11, 2024
@niksaveliev niksaveliev mentioned this pull request Jan 11, 2024
This was referenced Jan 15, 2024
@niksaveliev niksaveliev mentioned this pull request Feb 5, 2024
@starlinskiy starlinskiy mentioned this pull request Feb 12, 2024
@vitstn vitstn mentioned this pull request Feb 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants