forked from xen-project/xen
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
CODING_STYLE
202 lines (151 loc) · 7.29 KB
/
CODING_STYLE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
XL CODING STYLE
========================
AN APOLOGY AND WARNING
----------------------
Much of the code in xl does not yet follow this coding style
document in every respect. However, new code is expected to conform.
Patches to improve the style of existing code are welcome. Please
separate these out from functional changes.
If it is not feasible to conform fully to the style while patching old
code, without doing substantial style reengineering first, we may
accept patches which contain nonconformant elements, provided that
they don't make the coding style problem worse overall.
In this case, the new code should conform to the prevailing style in
the area being touched.
ERROR HANDLING
--------------
Unless, there are good reasons to do otherwise, the following error
handling and cleanup paradigm should be used:
* All local variables referring to resources which might need
cleaning up are declared at the top of the function, and
initialised to a sentinel value indicating "nothing allocated".
For example,
libxl_evgen_disk_eject *evg = NULL;
int nullfd = -1;
* If the function is to return a libxl error value, `rc' is
used to contain the error code, but it is NOT initialised:
int rc;
* There is only one error cleanup path out of the function. It
starts with a label `out:'. That error cleanup path checks for
each allocated resource and frees it iff necessary. It then
returns rc. For example,
out:
if (evg) libxl__evdisable_disk_eject(gc, evg);
if (nullfd >= 0) close(nullfd);
return rc;
* Function calls which might fail (ie most function calls) are
handled by putting the return/status value into a variable, and
then checking it in a separate statement:
char *dompath = libxl__xs_get_dompath(gc, bl->domid);
if (!dompath) { rc = ERROR_FAIL; goto out; }
* If a resource is freed in the main body of the function (for
example, in a loop), the corresponding variable has to be reset to
the sentinel at the point where it's freed.
Whether to use the `out' path for successful returns as well as error
returns is a matter of taste and convenience for the specific
function.
If you reuse the `out' path for successful returns, there may be
resources which are to be returned to the caller rather than freed.
In that case you have to reset the local variable to `nothing here',
to avoid the resource being freed on the out path. That resetting
should be done immediately after the resource value is stored at the
applicable _r function parameter (or equivalent). Do not test `rc' in
the out section, to discover whether to free things.
The uses of the single-line formatting in the examples above are
permitted exceptions to the usual xl code formatting rules.
FORMATTING AND NAMING
---------------------
Blatantly copied from qemu and linux with few modifications.
1. Whitespace
Of course, the most important aspect in any coding style is whitespace.
Crusty old coders who have trouble spotting the glasses on their noses
can tell the difference between a tab and eight spaces from a distance
of approximately fifteen parsecs. Many a flamewar have been fought and
lost on this issue.
Xl indents are four spaces. Tabs are never used, except in
Makefiles where they have been irreversibly coded into the syntax.
Spaces of course are superior to tabs because:
- You have just one way to specify whitespace, not two. Ambiguity breeds
mistakes.
- The confusion surrounding 'use tabs to indent, spaces to justify' is gone.
- Tab indents push your code to the right, making your screen seriously
unbalanced.
- Tabs will be rendered incorrectly on editors who are misconfigured not
to use tab stops of eight positions.
- Tabs are rendered badly in patches, causing off-by-one errors in almost
every line.
- It is the xl coding style.
Do not leave whitespace dangling off the ends of lines.
2. Line width
Lines are limited to 75-80 characters.
Rationale:
- Some people like to tile their 24" screens with a 6x4 matrix of 80x24
xterms and use vi in all of them. The best way to punish them is to
let them keep doing it.
- Code and especially patches is much more readable if limited to a sane
line length. Eighty is traditional.
- It is the xl coding style.
3. Naming
C is a Spartan language, and so should your naming be. Unlike Modula-2
and Pascal programmers, C programmers do not use cute names like
ThisVariableIsATemporaryCounter. A C programmer would call that
variable "tmp", which is much easier to write, and not the least more
difficult to understand.
HOWEVER, while mixed-case names are frowned upon, descriptive names for
global variables are a must. To call a global function "foo" is a
shooting offense.
GLOBAL variables (to be used only if you _really_ need them) need to
have descriptive names, as do global functions. If you have a function
that counts the number of active users, you should call that
"count_active_users()" or similar, you should _not_ call it "cntusr()".
Encoding the type of a function into the name (so-called Hungarian
notation) is brain damaged - the compiler knows the types anyway and can
check those, and it only confuses the programmer.
LOCAL variable names should be short, and to the point. If you have
some random integer loop counter, it should probably be called "i".
Calling it "loop_counter" is non-productive, if there is no chance of it
being mis-understood. Similarly, "tmp" can be just about any type of
variable that is used to hold a temporary value.
Local variables used to store return values should have descriptive name
like "rc" or "ret". Following the same reasoning the label used as exit
path should be called "out".
Function arguments which are used to return values to the caller
should be suffixed `_r' or `_out'.
Variables, type names and function names are
lower_case_with_underscores.
Xl should avoid using libxl_ and libxl__ as prefix for its own function
names.
4. Statements
Don't put multiple statements on a single line.
Don't put multiple assignments on a single line either.
Error code paths with an if statement and a goto or a return on the same
line are allowed. Examples:
if (rc) goto out;
if (rc < 0) return;
Xl coding style is super simple. Avoid tricky expressions.
5. Block structure
Every indented statement is braced, but blocks that contain just one
statement may have the braces omitted. To avoid confusion, either all
the blocks in an if...else chain have braces, or none of them do.
The opening brace is on the line that contains the control flow
statement that introduces the new block; the closing brace is on the
same line as the else keyword, or on a line by itself if there is no
else keyword. Examples:
if (a == 5) {
printf("a was 5.\n");
} else if (a == 6) {
printf("a was 6.\n");
} else {
printf("a was something else entirely.\n");
}
if (a == 5)
printf("a was 5.\n");
An exception is the opening brace for a function; for reasons of tradition
and clarity it comes on a line by itself:
void a_function(void)
{
do_something();
}
Rationale: a consistent (except for functions...) bracing style reduces
ambiguity and avoids needless churn when lines are added or removed.
Furthermore, it is the xl coding style.